Документы: Европейский Союз

61581

Case T-324/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — VI.TO. v EUIPO — Bottega (Shape of a golden bottle) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a golden bottle — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(e)(i) to (iii) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(i) to (iii) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61582

Case T-269/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Inditex v EUIPO — Ffauf Italia (ZARA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ZARA — Earlier national word and figurative marks LE DELIZIE ZARA and ZARA — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61583

Case T-185/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Lucchini v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Partial annulment of the Commission decision — Rejection of a request for reimbursement of a fine paid pursuant to a decision annulled in part — Rejection of a request to be allowed to participate in the administrative procedure that was reopened following the partial annulment of the decision — Rights of the defence — Non-existent act — Non-contractual liability — Limitation)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61584

Case T-99/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Stamatopoulos v ENISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Appointment to a post of head of unit — Rejection of application — Duty to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Transparency — Liability)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61585

Case T-57/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (WEIN FÜR PROFIS) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark WEIN FÜR PROFIS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Misleading character — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61586

Case T-56/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (WEIN FÜR PROFIS) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark WEIN FÜR PROFIS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Misleading character — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61587

Case T-55/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Team Beverage v EUIPO (LIEBLINGSWEIN) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark LIEBLINGSWEIN — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Misleading character — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61588

Case T-37/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v EUIPO — Heinrich Bauer Verlag (Brave Paper) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Brave Paper — Earlier national word mark BRAVO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Conceptual similarity)

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61589

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#EV v Inspectoratul General al Poliţiei Române – Brigada Autostrăzi şi misiuni speciale – Biroul de Poliţie Autostrada A1 Râmnicu Vâlcea – Deva (IGPR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Orăştie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 48 — Presumption of innocence and defence rights — Road traffic offences — Burden of proof — Failure to implement EU law — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-723/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61590

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Application for revision — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Conditions — Appeal — Failure to raise a new fact — Inadmissibility.#Case C-118/18 P-REV.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61591

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 8 mai 2019.#RE contre Praxair MRC SAS.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 96/34/CE – Accord‑cadre sur le congé parental – Clause 2, point 6 – Travailleur engagé à durée indéterminée et à temps plein en situation de congé parental à temps partiel – Licenciement – Indemnité de licenciement et allocation de congé de reclassement – Modalités de calcul – Article 157 TFUE – Égalité des rémunérations entre travailleurs féminins et travailleurs masculins – Congé parental à temps partiel pris essentiellement par les travailleurs féminins – Discrimination indirecte – Facteurs objectivement justifiés et étrangers à toute discrimination fondée sur le sexe – Absence.#Affaire C-486/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61592

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#RE v Praxair MRC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None.#Case C-486/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61593

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 mai 2019.#Verdi Ambiente e Società (VAS) - Aps Onlus et Movimento Legge Rifiuti Zero per l'Economia Circolare Aps contre Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2008/98/CE – Valorisation ou élimination des déchets – Mise en place d’un système intégré de gestion des déchets garantissant l’autosuffisance nationale – Création d’installations d’incinération ou augmentation de la capacité d’installations existantes – Qualification des installations d’incinération d’“infrastructures et implantations stratégiques d’intérêt national prééminent” – Respect du principe de la “hiérarchie des déchets” – Directive 2001/42/CE – Nécessité de procéder à une “évaluation environnementale”.#Affaire C-305/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61594

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#Verdi Ambiente e Società - Aps Onlus (VAS) and “Movimento Legge Rifiuti Zero per l'Economia Circolare” Aps v Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2008/98/EC — Disposal or recovery of waste — Establishment of an integrated waste management system guaranteeing national self-sufficiency — Construction of incineration facilities or increase in capacity of existing facilities — Classification of incineration facilities as ‘strategic infrastructure and installations of major national importance’ — Compliance with the ‘waste hierarchy’ principle — Directive 2001/42/EC — Need to carry out an ‘environmental assessment’.#Case C-305/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61595

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 8 mai 2019.#Stadt Euskirchen contre Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports – Services publics de transport de voyageurs par chemin de fer et par route – Règlement (CE) no 1370/2007 – Article 5, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Attribution directe – Contrats de services publics de transport de voyageurs par autobus et par tramway – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/UE – Article 28.#Affaire C-253/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61596

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram – Conditions – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12 – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 28.#Case C-253/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61597

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 8 mai 2019.#Entreprise commune européenne pour ITER et le développement de l’énergie de fusion contre Yosu Galocha.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Concours – Arrêt d’annulation – Étendue de l’annulation – Mise en balance des intérêts en présence – Annulation des listes de réserve – Annulation des décisions d’engager des lauréats figurant sur ces listes.#Affaire C-243/18 P.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61598

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy v Yosu Galocha.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Competition – Judgment annulling a decision – Extent of the annulment – Weighing up of interests involved – Annulment of reserve lists – Annulment of the decisions to appoint successful candidates from those lists.#Case C-243/18 P.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61599

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 mai 2019.#PI contre Landespolizeidirektion Tirol.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 49 TFUE – Article 15, paragraphe 2, et article 16 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Liberté d’établissement et de prestation de services – Restriction – Décision de fermeture immédiate d’un établissement commercial – Absence de motivation – Raisons impérieuses d’intérêt général – Prévention de la commission d’infractions pénales à l’égard des personnes qui se livrent à la prostitution – Protection de la santé publique – Caractère proportionné de la restriction de la liberté d’établissement – Articles 47 et 48 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Effectivité du contrôle juridictionnel – Droits de la défense – Principe général du droit à une bonne administration.#Affaire C-230/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.

61600

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 49 TFEU — Article 15(2) and Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services — Restriction — Decision to immediately close a commercial enterprise — No statement of reasons — Overriding reasons in the public interest –Prevention of criminal offences against persons engaged in prostitution — Protection of public health — Proportionality of the restriction on the freedom of establishment — Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Effectiveness of judicial review — Rights of defence — General principle of the right to good administration.#Case C-230/18.

cjeu_case · 8 мая 2019 г.