Документы: Европейский Союз

60381

Case T-385/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aldi v EUIPO — Crone (CRONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CRONE — Earlier EU figurative marks crane and earlier word mark CRANE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60382

Case T-334/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Bodegas Altún v EUIPO — Codorníu (ANA DE ALTUN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ANA DE ALTUN — Earlier national figurative mark ANNA — Relative ground for refusal — Reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60383

Case T-268/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Sandrone v EUIPO — J. Garcia Carrion (Luciano Sandrone) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Luciano Sandrone — Earlier EU word mark DON LUCIANO — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Application for an EU word mark consisting of a first name and of a surname — Earlier mark consisting of an honorific title and a first name — Neutrality of the conceptual comparison — No likelihood of confusion)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60384

Case T-135/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Szegedi v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Travel expenses — Parliamentary assistance expenses — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Rights of defence — Disclosure of evidence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60385

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 27 juin 2019.#RD contre SC.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (CE) no 805/2004 – Titre exécutoire européen pour les créances incontestées – Certification d’une décision judiciaire en tant que titre exécutoire européen – Normes minimales applicables aux procédures relatives aux créances incontestées – Défendeur sans adresse connue n’ayant pas comparu à l’audience.#Affaire C-518/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60386

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#RD v SC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing.#Case C-518/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60387

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 27 juin 2019.#Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele – Società semplice contre Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Prélèvement supplémentaire dans le secteur du lait et des produits laitiers – Règlement (CEE) no 3950/92 – Article 2, paragraphe 1, second alinéa – Établissement de la contribution des producteurs au paiement du prélèvement supplémentaire dû – Réallocation des quantités de référence inutilisées – Mesure nationale réallouant les quantités inutilisées sur la base de critères objectifs de priorité.#Affaire C-348/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60388

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele - Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers’ contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria.#Case C-348/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60389

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 27 June 2019.#A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Non-discrimination on the ground of age — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) — Article 9(1) — Right to a remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Creation of a new chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) with jurisdiction inter alia for cases of retiring the judges of that court — Chamber formed by judges newly appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on a proposal of the National Council of the Judiciary — Independence of that council — Power to disapply national legislation not in conformity with EU law — Primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60390

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 27 June 2019.#Vaselife International BV and Chrysal International BV v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Parallel trade — Modification of the period of validity of the parallel trade permit — Identity of the plant protection product and the reference product — Conditions.#Case C-445/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60391

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 27 June 2019.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Land Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Directive 2009/12/EC — Articles 3 and 6 — Article 11(1) and (7) — Airport charges — Protection of airport users’ rights — Whether it is possible for the airport managing body to agree charges lower than those approved by the independent supervisory authority — Remedies available to an airport user — Collateral challenge before a civil court giving judgment on the basis of equitable criteria.#Case C-379/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60392

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 27 June 2019.#Minoo Schuch-Ghannadan v Medizinische Universität Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework Agreement on part-time work – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Less favourable treatment of part-time workers compared to full-time workers as regards their conditions of employment – Prohibition – National legislation fixing a maximum duration of fixed-term employment that is longer for part-time workers than for full-time workers – Principle of pro rata temporis – Directive 2006/54/EC – Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation – Article 2(1)(b) – Concept of ‘indirect discrimination’ on grounds of sex – Article 14(1)(c) – Employment and working conditions – Article 19 – Burden of proof.#Case C-274/18.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60393

Case C-518/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích — Czech Republic) — RD v SC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims — Certification of a judicial decision as a European Enforcement Order — Minimum standards applicable to uncontested claims procedures — Defendant without a known address who did not appear at the hearing)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60394

Case C-348/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Azienda Agricola Barausse Antonio e Gabriele — Società semplice v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) (Preliminary reference — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(1) — Establishment of the producers' contribution to the payment of the additional levy due — Reallocation of unused reference quantities — National measure reallocating unused quantities on the basis of objective priority criteria)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60395

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#Hungary v European Commission.#State aid — Hungarian tax on the turnover from the broadcasting or publication of advertisements — Progressivity of tax rates — Deduction from the basis of assessment of the tax of 50% of the losses carried forward for companies not generating a profit in 2013 — Decision characterising the measures as aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Condition relating to selectivity.#Case T-20/17.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60396

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#Hungary v European Commission.#State aid — Hungarian tax on the turnover from the broadcasting or publication of advertisements — Progressivity of tax rates — Deduction from the basis of assessment of the tax of 50% of the losses carried forward for companies not generating a profit in 2013 — Decision characterising the measures as aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Condition relating to selectivity.#Case T-20/17.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60397

Case T-20/17: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Hungary v Commission (State aid — Hungarian tax on the turnover from the broadcasting or publication of advertisements — Progressivity of tax rates — Deduction from the basis of assessment of the tax of 50 % of the losses carried forward for companies not generating a profit in 2013 — Decision characterising the measures as aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Condition relating to selectivity)

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60398

Rectification order of 27 June 2019.#Falck Rettungsdienste GmbH and Falck A/S v Stadt Solingen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Case C-465/17 REC.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60399

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 27 juin 2019.#Belgisch Syndicaat van Chiropraxie e.a. contre Ministerraad.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 132, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Exonérations – Professions médicales et paramédicales – Chiropraxie et ostéopathie – Article 98 – Annexe III, points 3 et 4 – Médicaments et dispositifs médicaux – Taux réduit – Fourniture dans le cadre d’interventions ou de traitements à vocation thérapeutique – Taux normal – Fourniture dans le cadre d’interventions ou de traitements à vocation esthétique – Principe de neutralité fiscale – Maintien des effets d’une réglementation nationale incompatible avec le droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-597/17.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.

60400

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#Belgisch Syndicaat van Chiropraxie and Others v Ministerraad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(c) – Exemptions – Medical and paramedical professions – Chiropractic and osteopathy – Article 98 – Annex III, points (3) and (4) – Medicinal products and medical devices – Reduced rate – Supply as part of therapeutic interventions or treatments – Standard rate – Supply as part of aesthetic interventions or treatments – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Maintenance of the effects of national legislation incompatible with EU law.#Case C-597/17.

cjeu_case · 27 июня 2019 г.