Документы: Европейский Союз

59021

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Vitromed GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word elements Vitromed Germany — Rejection of the application.#Case C-124/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59022

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda and Others v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Grounds of appeal not satisfying the requirements of Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible — Action brought by an actual or legal person against a Member State — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded — Appeal brought against a newsletter from the Registry of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-98/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59023

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda and Others v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Grounds of appeal not satisfying the requirements of Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible — Action brought by an actual or legal person against a Member State — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded — Appeal brought against a newsletter from the Registry of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-98/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59024

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Camomilla Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings – Word mark CAMOMILLA — Rejection in part of the application for a declaration of invalidity.#Case C-68/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59025

Case C-677/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Vâlcea (Romania) lodged on 11 September 2019 — S.C. Valoris S.R.L. v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Craiova — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Vâlcea and Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59026

Case C-676/19 P: Appeal brought on 11 September 2019 by Bruno Gollnisch against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 11 July 2019 in Case T-95/18, Gollnisch v Parliament

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59027

Case C-673/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 September 2019 — M, A, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, other parties: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, T

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59028

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#ruwido austria GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark transparent pairing — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-649/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59029

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#YL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 with effect from 1 January 2017 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Disciplinary measure.#Case T-545/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59030

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#YL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 with effect from 1 January 2017 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Disciplinary measure.#Case T-545/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59031

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-286/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59032

Case T-649/18: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — ruwido austria v EUIPO (transparent pairing) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark transparent pairing — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59033

Case T-545/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — YL v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2017 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 with effect from 1 January 2017 — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Misuse of powers — Disciplinary measure)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59034

Case T-286/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Azarov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59035

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#HX v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded.#Case C-540/18 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59036

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#HX v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded.#Case C-540/18 P.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59037

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#DW contre Nobel Plastiques Ibérica SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2000/78/CE – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Article 2, paragraphe 2, sous b), ii), et article 5 – Interdiction de toute discrimination fondée sur un handicap – Travailleur particulièrement sensible aux risques professionnels, au sens du droit national – Existence d’un “handicap” – Licenciement pour raisons objectives fondé sur les critères de la productivité, de la polyvalence dans les postes de travail de l’entreprise ainsi que de l’absentéisme – Désavantage particulier pour les personnes handicapées – Discrimination indirecte – Aménagements raisonnables – Personne qui n’est pas compétente, ni capable, ni disponible pour remplir les fonctions essentielles du poste concerné.#Affaire C-397/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59038

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#DW v Nobel Plastiques Ibérica SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n° 3 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Article 2(2)(b)(ii) and Article 5 — Prohibition of any discrimination based on a disability — Worker particularly susceptible to occupational risks within the meaning of national law — Existence of a ‘disability’ — Dismissal for objective reasons based on criteria of productivity, multi-skilling in the undertaking’s posts and absenteeism — Particular disadvantage for disabled persons — Indirect discrimination — Reasonable accommodation — Individual who is not competent, capable and available to perform the essential functions of the post concerned.#Case C-397/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59039

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 septembre 2019.#Lexitor Sp. z o.o. contre Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo - Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 16, paragraphe 1 – Remboursement anticipé – Droit du consommateur à une réduction du coût total du crédit correspondant aux intérêts et aux frais dus pour la durée résiduelle du contrat.#Affaire C-383/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.

59040

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Lexitor Sp. z o.o v Spółdzielcza Kasa Oszczędnościowo - Kredytowa im. Franciszka Stefczyka and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Wschód w Lublinie z siedzibą w Świdniku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 16(1) — Early repayment — Right of the consumer to a reduction in the total cost of the credit, consisting of the interest and the costs for the remaining duration of the contract.#Case C-383/18.

cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.