Документы: Европейский Союз

58701

Case T-458/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Multifit v EUIPO (real nature) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark real nature — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58702

Case T-367/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Marijn van Oosten Holding (UKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58703

Case T-288/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58704

Case T-287/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (Nature’s Variety Instinct) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Nature’s Variety Instinct — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58705

Case T-65/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Venezuela v Council (Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela — Action brought by a third State — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58706

Case T-47/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — UZ v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary sanction — Downgrading by one grade and resetting of promotion points to zero — Rejection of the applicant’s request for assistance — Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out — Requirement of impartiality — Right to be heard — Procedural irregularity — Consequences of the procedural irregularity)

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58707

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Evaluation of substances – Benpat – Persistence – ECHA decision requesting further information – Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Action brought before the Board of Appeal – Task of the Board of Appeal – Adversarial procedure – Nature of review – Intensity of review – Powers of the Board of Appeal – Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Conferral of powers on EU agencies – Principle of conferral – Principle of subsidiarity – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-755/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58708

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Evaluation of substances – Benpat – Persistence – ECHA decision requesting further information – Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Action brought before the Board of Appeal – Task of the Board of Appeal – Adversarial procedure – Nature of review – Intensity of review – Powers of the Board of Appeal – Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Conferral of powers on EU agencies – Principle of conferral – Principle of subsidiarity – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-755/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58709

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Havenbedrijf Antwerpen NV and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven NV v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Concept of economic activity – Services of general economic interest – Non-economic activities – Separable nature – Selective nature – Request for a transitional period.#Case T-696/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58710

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Havenbedrijf Antwerpen NV and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven NV v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Concept of economic activity – Services of general economic interest – Non-economic activities – Separable nature – Selective nature – Request for a transitional period.#Case T-696/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58711

Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre élargie) du 20 septembre 2019.#Le Port de Bruxelles et Région de Bruxelles-Capitale contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Régime d’exonération de l’impôt des sociétés mis à exécution par la Belgique en faveur de ses ports – Décision déclarant le régime d’aides incompatible avec le marché intérieur – Notion d’activité économique – Services d’intérêt économique général – Activités non économiques – Caractère dissociable – Caractère sélectif – Article 93 TFUE et article 106, paragraphe 2, TFUE.#Affaire T-674/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58712

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Le Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v European Commission.#State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU.#Case T-674/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58713

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Port autonome du Centre et de l'Ouest SCRL and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU.#Case T-673/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58714

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Port autonome du Centre et de l'Ouest SCRL and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU.#Case T-673/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58715

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 (Extracts).#Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury.#Case T-650/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58716

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 (Extracts).#Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury.#Case T-650/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58717

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#PlasticsEurope v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality.#Case T-636/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58718

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#PlasticsEurope v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality.#Case T-636/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58719

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#ICL-IP Terneuzen, BV and ICL Europe Coöperatief UA v European Commission.#REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromopropane (nPB) in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Quantity — Registration dossier — Data — Grouping of substances — Principle of sound administration — Right to do business and to trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment.#Case T-610/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.

58720

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#ICL-IP Terneuzen, BV and ICL Europe Coöperatief UA v European Commission.#REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromopropane (nPB) in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Quantity — Registration dossier — Data — Grouping of substances — Principle of sound administration — Right to do business and to trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment.#Case T-610/17.

cjeu_case · 20 сентября 2019 г.