Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 документа
57781

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Austrian Power Grid AG and Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-333/17.

cjeu_case ·
57782

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Austrian Power Grid AG and Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-333/17.

cjeu_case ·
57783

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-332/17.

cjeu_case ·
57784

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-332/17.

cjeu_case ·
57786

Case T-778/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — Autostrada Wielkopolska v Commission (State aid — Toll-motorway concession — Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles — Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue — Shadow toll — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Improvement of the concessionaire’s expected financial situation — Criterion of the private operator in a market economy — Article 107(3)(a) TFEU — Regional State aid)

cjeu_case ·
57787

Case T-601/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — Rubik’s Brand v EUIPO — Simba Toys (Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
57790

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#SC Topaz Development SRL v Constantin Juncu and Raisa Juncu, née Cernica.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Promissory contract for sale and purchase drafted by the property developer and certified by a notary — Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) — Proof of the negotiated nature of the terms — Presumption — Consumer’s signature of the contract — Article 3(3) — Paragraph 1(d) to (f) and (i) of the Annex — Express forfeiture clause — Penalty clause — Unfairness — Articles 6 and 7 — Possibility for the national court to vary the term found to be unfair.#Case C-211/17.

cjeu_case ·
57791

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#SC Topaz Development SRL v Constantin Juncu and Raisa Juncu, née Cernica.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Promissory contract for sale and purchase drafted by the property developer and certified by a notary — Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) — Proof of the negotiated nature of the terms — Presumption — Consumer’s signature of the contract — Article 3(3) — Paragraph 1(d) to (f) and (i) of the Annex — Express forfeiture clause — Penalty clause — Unfairness — Articles 6 and 7 — Possibility for the national court to vary the term found to be unfair.#Case C-211/17.

cjeu_case ·
57793

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2014/41/EU — European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters — Article 5(1) — Form set out in Annex A — Section J — Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State.#Case C-324/17.

cjeu_case ·
57794

Case C-211/17: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău, Romania) — SC Topaz Development SRL v Constantin Juncu, Raisa Juncu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Promissory contract for sale and purchase drafted by the property developer and certified by a notary — Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) — Proof of the negotiated nature of the terms — Presumption — Consumer’s signature of the contract — Article 3(3) — Paragraph 1(d) to (f) and (i) of the Annex — Express forfeiture clause — Penalty clause — Unfairness — Articles 6 and 7 — Possibility for the national court to vary the term found to be unfair)

cjeu_case ·
57795

Case C-324/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2014/41/EU — European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters — Article 5(1) — Form set out in Annex A — Section J — Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State)

cjeu_case ·
57796

Council Decision (EU) 2021/570 of 24 October 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip on the general principles for its participation in Union programmes

decision ·