Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
54625

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#Boé Aquitaine SELARL v Mercialys SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-838/19.

cjeu_case ·
54626

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#Boé Aquitaine SELARL v Mercialys SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Bordeaux.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-838/19.

cjeu_case ·
54627

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) – Annulment of a decision not to renew a fixed-term contract – Application for revision – Inadmissibility – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-682/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
54628

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) – Annulment of a decision not to renew a fixed-term contract – Application for revision – Inadmissibility – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-682/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
54629

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 19 mars 2020.#Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña SA contre Ayuntamiento de A Coruña.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (CE) no 1370/2007 – Services publics de transport de voyageurs par chemin de fer et par route – Article 8 – Régime transitoire – Article 8, paragraphe 3 – Expiration des contrats de service public – Calcul de la durée maximale des contrats fixée à 30 ans – Détermination de la date à partir de laquelle la durée maximale de 30 ans commence à courir.#Affaire C-45/19.

cjeu_case ·
54630

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña, SA v Ayuntamiento de A Coruña.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo A Coruña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 8 — Transitional arrangements — Article 8(3) — Expiry of public service contracts — Calculation of the maximum contractual term set at 30 years — Determination of the date from which the maximum term of 30 years starts to run.#Case C-45/19.

cjeu_case ·
54631

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 19 March 2020.#B. M. M. and Others v État belge.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 4(1) — Concept of a ‘minor child’ — Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Best interests of the child — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to an effective remedy — Children of the sponsor who have reached majority during the decision-making procedure or court proceedings against the decision refusing the family reunification application.#Joined Cases C-133/19, C-136/19 and C-137/19.

cjeu_case ·
54632

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 March 2020.#NG and OH v SC Banca Transilvania SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Scope — Article 1(2) — Definition of ‘mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions’ — Supplementary provisions — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term relating to the foreign exchange risk.#Case C-81/19.

cjeu_case ·
54633

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 19 March 2020.#Criminal proceedings against XN and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Waste – Shipments – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure – Article 1(3) – Shipments subject to approval requirements – Directive 2008/98/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘by-products’ – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Article 3, point 1 – Concept of ‘animal by-products’ – Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material.#Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19.

cjeu_case ·
54635

Case C-45/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de A Coruña — Spain) — Compañía de Tranvías de La Coruña SA v Ayuntamiento de A Coruña (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 8 — Transitional arrangements — Article 8(3) — Expiry of public service contracts — Calculation of the maximum contractual term set at 30 years — Determination of the date from which the maximum term of 30 years starts to run)

cjeu_case ·
54636

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#ClientEarth v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(1)(a), third indent, and (6) — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of the public interest as regards international relations — Documents drawn up by the European Commission’s legal service concerning Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Investment Court System in EU trade agreements — Partial refusal of access.#Case C-612/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
54637

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#ClientEarth v European Commission.#Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 4(1)(a), third indent, and (6) — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of the public interest as regards international relations — Documents drawn up by the European Commission’s legal service concerning Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Investment Court System in EU trade agreements — Partial refusal of access.#Case C-612/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
54638

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 19 mars 2020.#LH contre Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Directive 2013/32/UE – Demande de protection internationale – Article 33, paragraphe 2 – Motifs d’irrecevabilité – Réglementation nationale prévoyant l’irrecevabilité de la demande si le demandeur est arrivé dans l’État membre concerné par un pays où il n’est pas exposé à la persécution ou au risque d’atteintes graves, ou si ce pays accorde une protection suffisante – Article 46 – Droit à un recours effectif – Contrôle juridictionnel des décisions administratives concernant l’irrecevabilité des demandes de protection internationale – Délai de huit jours pour statuer – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-564/18.

cjeu_case ·
54639

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2020.#LH v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Application for international protection – Article 33(2) – Grounds of inadmissibility – National legislation under which an application is inadmissible if the applicant has arrived in the Member State concerned via a country in which he or she is not exposed to persecution or the risk of serious harm, or if that country provides sufficient protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Judicial review of administrative decisions concerning the inadmissibility of applications for international protection – Time limit of eight days within which to give a decision – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-564/18.

cjeu_case ·
54640

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 19 mars 2020.#PG contre Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune en matière d’asile et de protection subsidiaire – Procédures communes pour l’octroi de la protection internationale – Directive 2013/32/UE – Article 46, paragraphe 3 – Examen complet et ex nunc – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit à un recours effectif – Pouvoirs et devoirs de la juridiction de première instance – Absence de pouvoir de réformation des décisions des autorités compétentes en matière de protection internationale – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une obligation de statuer dans un délai de 60 jours.#Affaire C-406/18.

cjeu_case ·