Документы: Европейский Союз

53721

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-445/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53722

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-445/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53723

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity and revocation proceedings — EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the EU trade mark — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-444/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53724

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity and revocation proceedings — EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the EU trade mark — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-444/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53725

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020 (Extracts).#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg – Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for – Demarcation agreement – Application of national law by EUIPO – Suspension of the administrative proceedings – Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-443/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53726

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020 (Extracts).#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg – Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for – Demarcation agreement – Application of national law by EUIPO – Suspension of the administrative proceedings – Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-443/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53727

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Agmin Italy SpA v European Commission.#Financial Regulation — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general EU budget and by the European Development Fund for a two-year period — Principle of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality.#Case T-290/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53728

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Agmin Italy SpA v European Commission.#Financial Regulation — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general EU budget and by the European Development Fund for a two-year period — Principle of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality.#Case T-290/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53729

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Talanton AE - Symvouleftiki-Ekpaideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ypiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Perform Contract — Eligible costs — Repayment in part of the sums paid — Abuse of contractual rights — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations — Burden of proof — Counterclaim.#Case T-195/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53730

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Talanton AE - Symvouleftiki-Ekpaideftiki Etaireia Dianomon, Parochis Ypiresion Marketing kai Dioikisis Epicheiriseon v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Perform Contract — Eligible costs — Repayment in part of the sums paid — Abuse of contractual rights — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations — Burden of proof — Counterclaim.#Case T-195/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53731

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2020.#easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v European Commission.#State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Imputability to the State — Beneficiaries — Advantage for co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-8/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53732

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2020.#easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v European Commission.#State aid — Aviation sector — Aid granted by Italy in favour of Sardinian airports — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Imputability to the State — Beneficiaries — Advantage for co-contracting airlines — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-8/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53733

Case T-535/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek’s) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek’s — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53734

Case T-534/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53735

Case T-446/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53736

Case T-445/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53737

Case T-444/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Invalidity and revocation proceedings — EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the EU trade mark — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53738

Case T-443/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Vogue Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53739

Case T-290/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Agmin Italy v Commission (Financial Regulation — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general EU budget and by the European Development Fund for a two-year period — Principle of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53740

Case T-195/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Talanton v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Perform Contract — Eligible costs — Repayment in part of the sums paid — Abuse of contractual rights — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations — Burden of proof — Counterclaim)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.