Документы: Европейский Союз

53701

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Clatronic International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark PROFI CARE — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-5/19.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53702

Case T-308/19: Order of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Lucaccioni v Commission (Action for annulment and for compensation — Civil service — Non actionable measure — Preparatory measure — No claim — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part inadmissible)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53703

Case T-532/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — EC Brand Comércio, Importação e Exportação de Vestuário em Geral v EUIPO (pantys) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark pantys — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53704

Case T-503/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO (XOXO) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark XOXO — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53705

Case T-381/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — adp Gauselmann v EUIPO — Gameloft (City Mania) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark City Mania — Earlier EU word mark City Lights — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53706

Case T-288/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Divaro v EUIPO — Grendene (IPANEMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark IPANEMA — Earlier EU figurative mark Ipanema — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53707

Case T-284/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Wonder Line v EUIPO — De Longhi Benelux (KENWELL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark KENWELL — Earlier EU word mark KENWOOD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53708

Case T-172/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Cognac Ferrand v EUIPO (Shape of braiding on a bottle) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of braiding on a bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53709

Case T-156/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Koenig & Bauer v EUIPO (we’re on it) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark we’re on it — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53710

Case T-86/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — SolNova v EUIPO — Canina Pharma (BIO-INSECT Shocker) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BIO-INSECT Shocker — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53711

Case T-76/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Pontinova v EUIPO — Ponti & Partners (pontinova) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark pontinova — Earlier national word mark PONTI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relevant public — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53712

Case T-63/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Rot Front v EUIPO — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (РОШЕН) (EU trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark РОШЕН — Earlier international figurative mark РОМАШКИ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53713

Case T-49/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — View. v EUIPO (CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS — Trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53714

Case T-5/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Clatronic International v EUIPO (PROFI CARE) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark PROFI CARE — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53715

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek’s — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-535/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53716

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek’s — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-535/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53717

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-534/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53718

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-534/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53719

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-446/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.

53720

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2020.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Peek & Cloppenburg — Earlier national commercial designation Peek & Cloppenburg — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Coexistence of the national commercial designation and the mark applied for — Demarcation agreement — Application of national law by EUIPO — Suspension of the administrative proceedings — Article 70 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-446/18.

cjeu_case · 13 мая 2020 г.