Документы: Европейский Союз

53061

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#China Construction Bank Corp. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Opposition – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Risque de confusion – Appréciation de la similitude des signes en conflit – Appréciation du caractère distinctif de la marque antérieure.#Affaire C-115/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53062

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#China Construction Bank Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Opposition — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Assessment of the similarity of the signs at issue — Assessment of the distinctive character of the earlier mark.#Case C-115/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53063

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#Commission européenne contre Danilo Di Bernardo.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Concours général – Non-admission aux épreuves – Possibilité pour l’administration de compléter la motivation de la décision de non-admission devant le juge – Conditions – Cas exceptionnels – Notion d’“absence de motivation”.#Affaire C-114/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53064

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#European Commission v Danilo Di Bernardo.#Appeal — Civil service — Open competition — Non-admission to tests — Possible for the administration to supplement before the Court the statement of reasons for the decision not to admit — Conditions — Exceptional cases — Concept of ‘absence of a statement of reasons’.#Case C-114/19 P.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53065

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53066

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Asociaţia “Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor” v TM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV – Canis lupus (wolf) – Article 16(1) – Natural range – Capture and transport of a specimen of a wild animal of the canis lupus species – Public safety.#Case C-88/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53067

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#LE v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Article 7(1) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Unruly passengers — Possibility of relying on the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance in respect of a flight not affected by that circumstance– Concept of ‘reasonable measures’.#Case C-74/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53068

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#LE v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa - Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa – Juiz 18.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Article 7(1) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Unruly passengers — Possibility of relying on the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance in respect of a flight not affected by that circumstance– Concept of ‘reasonable measures’.#Case C-74/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53069

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#Vodafone Portugal – Comunicações Pessoais SA contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Champ d’application – Opérations imposables – Prestation de services effectuée à titre onéreux – Indemnité versée en cas de non-respect par les clients de la période minimale d’engagement contractuel – Qualification.#Affaire C-43/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53070

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#Vodafone Portugal – Comunicações Pessoais, SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(c) — Scope — Taxable transactions — Services supplied for consideration — Monies paid where customers fail to comply with the contractual tie-in period — Characterisation.#Case C-43/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53071

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 juin 2020.#État belge contre Pantochim SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Assistance mutuelle en matière de recouvrement de créances – Directive 76/308/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 2, et article 10 – Directive 2008/55/CE – – Article 6, second alinéa, et article 10 – Créance fiscale de l’État membre requérant recouvrée par l’État membre requis – Qualité de cette créance – Notion de “privilège” – Compensation légale entre ladite créance et une dette fiscale de l’État membre requis.#Affaire C-19/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53072

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020.#État belge v Pantochim SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Mutual assistance for the recovery of claims — Directive 76/308/EEC — Article 6(2) and Article 10 — Directive 2008/55/EC — Second paragraph of Article 6 and Article 10 — Tax claim of requesting Member State recovered by requested Member State — Status of that claim — Concept of ‘privilege’ — Statutory set-off of that claim against tax debt of requested Member State.#Case C-19/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53073

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 11 June 2020.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v VR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/109/EC – Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents – Article 11 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the determination of rights to a family benefit, the family members of a long-term resident who do not reside in the territory of that Member State.#Case C-303/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53074

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 11 June 2020.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v WS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third country workers who hold single permits – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the purposes of determining entitlement to a family benefit, the family members of the holder of a single permit who do not reside in the territory of that Member State.#Case C-302/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53075

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 11 June 2020.#UQ v Marclean Technologies, SLU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) – Concept of ‘collective redundancies’ – Methods of calculating the number of redundancies – Reference period to take into account.#Case C-300/19.

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53076

Case C-472/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Vert Marine SAS v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Concession contract award procedure — Directive 2014/23/EU — Article 38(9) — System of compliance measures to demonstrate the reliability of an economic operator affected by a ground for exclusion — National legislation prohibiting economic operators which are the subject of a ground for compulsory exclusion from participating, for a period of 5 years, in a concession contract award procedure — Impossible for such operators to demonstrate that compliance measures have been taken)

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53077

Case C-448/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — WT v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Directive 2003/109/EC — Article 12 — Adoption of a decision to expel a long-term resident — Elements to be taken into consideration — National case-law — Failure to take those elements into consideration — Compatibility — Directive 2001/40/EC — Mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals — Relevance)

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53078

Case C-378/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ústavný súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovak Republic) — proceedings brought by Prezident Slovenskej republiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 35(4) and (5) — Independence of regulatory authorities — National legislation transferring the power to appoint the president of the national regulatory authority from the Head of State to the government — national ministries participating in price-setting procedures)

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53079

Case C-242/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — CHEP Equipment Pooling NV v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti — Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti — Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 17(2)(g) — Transfer of movable property within the European Union with a view to the supply of services — Articles 170 and 171 — Right to VAT refund of taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund — Directive 2008/9/EC — Concept of ‘taxable person not established in the Member State of refund’ — Taxable person not identified for VAT purposes in the Member State of refund)

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.

53080

Case C-219/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Parsec Fondazione Parco delle Scienze e della Cultura v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Procurement procedure for the award of a service contract — Architectural and engineering services — Article 19(1) and Article 80(2) — National legislation limiting participation solely to economic operators in certain legal forms)

cjeu_case · 11 июня 2020 г.