Документы: Европейский Союз

52441

Case T-21/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Pablosky v EUIPO — docPrice (mediFLEX easySTEP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark mediFLEX easySTEP — Earlier EU figurative mark Stepeasy — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52442

Case T-20/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Pablosky v EUIPO — docPrice (mediFLEX easystep) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark mediFLEX easystep — Earlier EU figurative mark Stepeasy — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52443

Case C-905/19: Order of the President of the Court of 8 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt — Germany) — EP v Kreis Groß-Gerau

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52444

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool – Earlier design – Proof of disclosure – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-748/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52445

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Glimarpol sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool – Earlier design – Proof of disclosure – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-748/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52446

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Securitec v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Selection criteria – Illegality of a clause in the tender specifications – Equal treatment.#Case T-661/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52447

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Securitec v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Maintenance of security installations in buildings occupied and/or managed by the Commission in Belgium and Luxembourg – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Selection criteria – Illegality of a clause in the tender specifications – Equal treatment.#Case T-661/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52448

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#CA Consumer Finance v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution – First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Continued breach of capital requirements – Negligent breach – Rights of defence – Amount of the penalty – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-578/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52449

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#CA Consumer Finance v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution – First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Continued breach of capital requirements – Negligent breach – Rights of defence – Amount of the penalty – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-578/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52450

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution – First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Continued breach of capital requirements – Negligent breach – Rights of defence – Amount of the penalty – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-577/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52451

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution – First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Continued breach of capital requirements – Negligent breach – Rights of defence – Amount of the penalty – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-577/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52452

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#Crédit agricole SA v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution – First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Continued breach of capital requirements – Negligent breach – Retroactive application of less severe enforcement legislation – Absence – Rights of defence – Amount of the penalty – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-576/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52453

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#Crédit agricole SA v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution – First subparagraph of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Continued breach of capital requirements – Negligent breach – Retroactive application of less severe enforcement legislation – Absence – Rights of defence – Amount of the penalty – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-576/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52454

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Neda Industrial Group v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of assessment – Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment.#Case T-490/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52455

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2020.#Neda Industrial Group v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of assessment – Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment.#Case T-490/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52456

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#BRF SA and SHB Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos SA v European Commission.#Public health — Specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption — Amendment of the lists of third country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments from Brazil — Article 12(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 — Comitology — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Powers of the Commission — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T-429/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52457

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#BRF SA and SHB Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos SA v European Commission.#Public health — Specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption — Amendment of the lists of third country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments from Brazil — Article 12(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 — Comitology — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Powers of the Commission — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T-429/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52458

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#VQ v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution for infringement of Article 77(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Rules for publication on the ECB’s website — Article 18(6) of Regulation No 1024/2013 and Article 132(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014.#Case T-203/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52459

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#VQ v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution for infringement of Article 77(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Rules for publication on the ECB’s website — Article 18(6) of Regulation No 1024/2013 and Article 132(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014.#Case T-203/18.

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.

52460

Case T-748/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Glimarpol v EUIPO — Metar (Pneumatic power tool) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a pneumatic power tool — Earlier design — Proof of disclosure — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · 8 июля 2020 г.