Документы: Европейский Союз

51041

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Annemieke Bax v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Career transition support – Eligibility – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Duty of care – Discrimination on grounds of sex – Proportionality – Liability.#Case T-433/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51042

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Bauer Radio Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MUSIKISS – Earlier United Kingdom word and figurative marks KISS – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom – Transition period – Decision of the Board of Appeal to remit the case to the Opposition Division – Admissibility – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-421/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51043

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Bauer Radio Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MUSIKISS – Earlier United Kingdom word and figurative marks KISS – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom – Transition period – Decision of the Board of Appeal to remit the case to the Opposition Division – Admissibility – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-421/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51044

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education – Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning – Eligible costs – Debit notes – Repayment of part of the sums advanced – Contractual liability.#Case T-408/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51045

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education – Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning – Eligible costs – Debit notes – Repayment of part of the sums advanced – Contractual liability.#Case T-408/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51046

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#VE v European Securities and Markets Authority.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract for an indefinite period – Appraisal report – 2016 appraisal exercise – Plea of illegality relating to the appraisal manual – Manifest error of assessment – Assessment of activities undertaken as staff representative – Procedural irregularity – Termination of the employment contract – Insufficient performance during a period of two years.#Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51047

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#VE v European Securities and Markets Authority.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract for an indefinite period – Appraisal report – 2016 appraisal exercise – Plea of illegality relating to the appraisal manual – Manifest error of assessment – Assessment of activities undertaken as staff representative – Procedural irregularity – Termination of the employment contract – Insufficient performance during a period of two years.#Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51048

Case T-596/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — ZL v EUIPO (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests — Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51049

Case T-433/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 –Bax v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Career transition support — Eligibility — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Duty of care — Discrimination on grounds of sex — Proportionality — Liability)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51050

Case T-421/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Bauer Radio v EUIPO — Weinstein (MUSIKISS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MUSIKISS — Earlier United Kingdom word and figurative marks KISS — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom — Transition period — Decision of the Board of Appeal to remit the case to the Opposition Division — Admissibility — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51051

Case T-408/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v EACEA (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement entered into under Erasmus Mundus action programme No 3 for the promotion of higher education — Grant agreement entered into under the programme for lifelong learning — Eligible costs — Debit notes — Repayment of part of the sums advanced — Contractual liability)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51052

Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — VE v ESMA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Appraisal report — 2016 appraisal exercise — Plea of illegality relating to the appraisals guide — Manifest error of assessment — Assessment of activities undertaken as staff representative — Procedural irregularity — Termination of the work contract — Insufficient performance during a period of two years)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51053

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 septembre 2020.#WO contre Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Assurance maladie – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Article 20 – Soins programmés – Autorisation préalable – Octroi obligatoire – Conditions – Empêchement de la personne assurée de solliciter une autorisation préalable – Règlement (CE) no 987/2009 – Article 26 – Prise en charge des coûts des soins programmés engagés par la personne assurée – Modalités de remboursement – Directive 2011/24/UE – Soins de santé transfrontaliers – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Soins de santé susceptibles d’être soumis à autorisation préalable – Principe de proportionnalité – Article 9, paragraphe 3 – Traitement des demandes de soins de santé transfrontaliers – Éléments à prendre en compte – Délai raisonnable – Libre prestation des services – Article 56 TFUE.#Affaire C-777/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51054

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#WO v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Sickness insurance – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 20 – Scheduled treatment – Prior authorisation – Mandatory grant – Conditions – Insured person prevented from applying for prior authorisation – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 26 – Assumption of costs of scheduled treatment incurred by the insured person – Procedure for reimbursement – Directive 2011/24/EU – Cross-border healthcare – Article 8(1) – Healthcare that may be subject to prior authorisation – Principle of proportionality – Article 9(3) – Processing of applications for cross-border healthcare – Factors to be taken into account – Reasonable time – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU.#Case C-777/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51055

Case C-777/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — WO v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Sickness insurance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 20 — Scheduled treatment — Prior authorisation — Mandatory grant — Conditions — Insured person prevented from applying for prior authorisation — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Article 26 — Assumption of costs of scheduled treatment incurred by the insured person — Procedure for reimbursement — Directive 2011/24/EU — Cross-border healthcare — Article 8(1) — Healthcare that may be subject to prior authorisation — Principle of proportionality — Article 9(3) — Processing of applications for cross-border healthcare — Factors to be taken into account — Reasonable time — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51056

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Obligation to state reasons – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-420/17.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51057

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Obligation to state reasons – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-420/17.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51058

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, formerly Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Obligation to state reasons – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-414/17.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51059

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, formerly Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Obligation to state reasons – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-414/17.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51060

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-411/17.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.