Документы: Европейский Союз

51021

Case T-549/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan medicinal products — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan — Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products — Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ — Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 — Error of law)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51022

Case T-522/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (BBQ BARBECUE SEASON) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark BBQ BARBECUE SEASON — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51023

Case T-472/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — BASF v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters — Variation of the terms of the authorisation — First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51024

Case T-402/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe — Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51025

Case T-401/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and anthracite — Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51026

Case T-370/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Spain v Commission (External relations — Technical cooperation — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 — Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body — Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo — Concept of third country — Error of law)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51027

Case T-338/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — UE v Commission (Civil service — Temporary members of staff — Health problems alleged to have been caused by working conditions — Request for recognition of an occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Right to be heard — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51028

Case T-314/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Development and testing of sensor systems for quality and performance control in baking processes — Bread-Guard Project — Overlap of the project with another project financed under the same programme — Changes to the description of the tasks to be undertaken — Loss of the intellectual property rights required for the execution of the project — Overestimation of the number of people needed each month for the project — Beneficiaries’ duty to provide information — Serious misconduct — Termination by the Commission of the grant agreement)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51029

Case T-292/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51030

Case T-291/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51031

Case T-289/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Arbuzov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51032

Case T-174/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Vincenti v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 — Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade — Right to be heard)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51033

Case T-36/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — PE Digital v EUIPO — Spark Networks Services (ElitePartner) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU trade mark ElitePartner — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51034

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 23 September 2020.###

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51035

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 23 September 2020.#Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from theTribunalul Olt and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Treaty of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union – Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Articles 37 and 38 – Appropriate measures – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Decision 2006/928/EC – Legal nature and effects of the cooperation and verification mechanism and of the reports established by the Commission on the basis of that mechanism – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Laws and government emergency ordinances adopted in Romania in the course of 2018 and 2019 concerning the organisation of the judicial system and the liability of judges – Interim appointment to management positions of the Judicial Inspectorate – Establishment of a section within the Public Prosecutor’s Office for the investigation of offences committed within the judicial system – Financial liability of the State and personal liability of judges in the event of judicial error.#Joined Cases C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19 and C-397/19.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51036

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#ZL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings.#Case T-596/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51037

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#ZL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings.#Case T-596/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51038

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Damage to reputation – Determination of listing criteria.#Case T-510/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51039

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Damage to reputation – Determination of listing criteria.#Case T-510/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.

51040

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Annemieke Bax v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Career transition support – Eligibility – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Duty of care – Discrimination on grounds of sex – Proportionality – Liability.#Case T-433/18.

cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.