Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
50741

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Novel foods and novel food ingredients – Regulation (EC) No 258/97 – Article 1(2)(e) – Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ – Placing on the market – Whole insects intended for human consumption.#Case C-526/19.

cjeu_case ·
50742

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#Vos Aannemingen BVBA contre Belgische Staat.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Sixième directive 77/388/CEE – Article 17, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Droit à déduction de la taxe payée en amont – Services ayant également bénéficié à des tiers – Existence d’un lien direct et immédiat avec l’activité économique de l’assujetti – Existence d’un lien direct et immédiat avec une ou plusieurs opérations effectuées en aval.#Affaire C-405/19.

cjeu_case ·
50743

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Vos Aannemingen BVBA v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 17(2)(a) – Right to deduct input tax – Services also having benefited third parties – Existence of a direct and immediate link with the taxable person’s economic activity – Existence of a direct and immediate link with one or more output transactions.#Case C-405/19.

cjeu_case ·
50746

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-349/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50747

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-349/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50748

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-348/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50749

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-348/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50750

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 1er octobre 2020.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën contre X.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 98 – Faculté pour les États membres d’appliquer un taux réduit de TVA à certaines livraisons de biens et prestations de services – Annexe III, point 1 – Notions de “denrées alimentaires destinées à la consommation humaine” et de “produits normalement utilisés pour compléter ou remplacer des denrées alimentaires” – Produits aphrodisiaques.#Affaire C-331/19.

cjeu_case ·
50751

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Annex III, point 1 – Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ – Aphrodisiac products.#Case C-331/19.

cjeu_case ·
50752

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-261/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50753

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-261/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50754

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant's name – Action for annulment.#Case C-260/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50755

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant's name – Action for annulment.#Case C-260/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50756

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant's name – Action for annulment.#Case C-159/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50757

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant's name – Action for annulment.#Case C-159/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50758

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Razan Othman v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-158/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50759

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Razan Othman v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-158/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
50760

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-157/19 P.

cjeu_case ·