Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
49421

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#VO and Others v SATA International – Azores Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Not included – Passengers travelling for free or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public.#Case C-316/20.

cjeu_case ·
49422

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#VO and Others v SATA International – Azores Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Not included – Passengers travelling for free or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public.#Case C-316/20.

cjeu_case ·
49426

Case C-318/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Voidafone Italia SpA, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze v Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze, Wind Tre SpA, Procura generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Locri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities — Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
49427

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 26 novembre 2020.#Autostrada Torino Ivrea Valle D’Aosta – Ativa SpA contre Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Attribution de contrats de concession – Directive 2014/23/UE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, premier alinéa – Article 30 – Liberté des pouvoirs adjudicateurs de définir et d’organiser la procédure conduisant au choix du concessionnaire – Réglementation nationale interdisant le recours au financement de projets pour les contrats de concession d’autoroute.#Affaire C-835/19.

cjeu_case ·
49428

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#Autostrada Torino Ivrea Valle D’Aosta – Ativa S.p.A. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/23/EU – Article 2(1), first subparagraph – Article 30 – Freedom of contracting authorities to establish and organise the procedure leading to the choice of concessionaire – National legislation prohibiting the use of project financing for motorway concessions.#Case C-835/19.

cjeu_case ·
49429

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 26 novembre 2020.#Procédure engagée par « DSK Bank » EAD et « FrontEx International » EAD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Articles 3 et 6 à 8 – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 22 – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Examen d’office par le juge national – Procédure nationale d’injonction de payer.#Affaire C-807/19.

cjeu_case ·
49430

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#Proceedings brought by „DSK Bank“ EAD and „FrontEx International“ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Articles 3 and 6 to 8 – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 22 – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Examination by the national court of its own motion – National order for payment procedure.#Case C-807/19.

cjeu_case ·
49432

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 26 November 2020.#DK v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Determination of that penalty – Withholding of an amount from the pension – Criminal conviction and civil sanction before national courts – Compensation, in whole or in part, for non-material damage caused to the European Union – Lack of relevance of that compensation – Article 10 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-851/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
49434

Case C-835/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Autostrada Torino Ivrea Valle D’Aosta — Ativa S.p.A. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Award of concession contracts — Directive 2014/23/EU — Article 2(1), first subparagraph — Article 30 — Freedom of awarding authorities to define and organise the procedure leading to the selection of the concession holder — National legislation prohibiting the use of project financing for motorway concession contracts)

cjeu_case ·
49435

Case C-807/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — proceedings brought by DSK Bank EAD and FrontEx International EAD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Articles 3 and 6 to 8 — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 22 — Unfair terms in contracts concluded with consumers — Examination by the national court of its own motion — National order for payment procedure)

cjeu_case ·
49436

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 26 novembre 2020.#Skatteverket contre Sögård Fastigheter AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Législation nationale prévoyant la régularisation des déductions de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) par un assujetti autre que celui ayant initialement opéré la déduction – Vente par une société à des particuliers d’un immeuble donné en location par ladite société ainsi que par la précédente société propriétaire – Fin de l’assujettissement à la TVA lors de la vente de l’immeuble à des particuliers.#Affaire C-787/18.

cjeu_case ·
49437

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2020.#Skatteverket v Sögård Fastigheter AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – National legislation providing for the adjustment of value added tax (VAT) deductions by a taxable person other than the person who initially applied the deduction – Sale by a company to individuals of a building let by that company and by the company which previously owned the building – End of liability to VAT upon the sale of the building to individuals.#Case C-787/18.

cjeu_case ·
49438

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 26 November 2020.#thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo v European Commission.#Appeal – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 211(6) – Authorisation for inward processing of certain grain-oriented electrical steel products – Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers – Examination of the economic conditions – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 – Article 259 – European Commission’s conclusion on the economic conditions – Article 263 TFEU – Act not open to challenge.#Case C-572/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
49439

Case C-787/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v Sögård Fastigheter AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — National legislation providing for the adjustment of deductions of value added tax (VAT) by a taxable person other than the person who initially applied the deduction — Sale by a company to individuals of a building let by that company and by the previous owning company — End of VAT liability when the property is sold to individuals)

cjeu_case ·