Документы: Европейский Союз

48721

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 – Harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products – Harmonised standards and technical regulations – Harmonised standards EN 14342:2013, EN 14904:2006, EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 – Action for annulment.#Joined Cases C-475/19 P and C-688/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48722

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 – Harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products – Harmonised standards and technical regulations – Harmonised standards EN 14342:2013, EN 14904:2006, EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 – Action for annulment.#Joined Cases C-475/19 P and C-688/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48723

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#WEG Tevesstraße contre Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Exonération en faveur de l’affermage et de la location de biens immeubles – Réglementation nationale exonérant de la TVA la livraison de chaleur par un groupement de propriétaires de logements aux propriétaires faisant partie de ce groupement.#Affaire C-449/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48724

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#WEG Tevesstraße v Finanzamt Villingen-Schwenningen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemption for leasing and letting immovable property – National legislation exempting from VAT the supply of heat by an association of residential property owners to property owners belonging to that association.#Case C-449/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48725

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. et Inpost S.A. contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Article 106, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Services d’intérêt économique général (SIEG) – Encadrement de l’Union européenne – Application aux aides d’État sous forme de compensations de service public – Secteur postal – Directive 97/67/CE – Article 7 – Compensation du coût net résultant des obligations de service universel – Décision déclarant l’aide compatible avec le marché intérieur.#Affaires jointes C-431/19 P et C-432/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48726

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 106(2) TFEU – Services of general economic interest (SGEIs) – EU framework – Application to State aid in the form of public service compensation – Postal sector – Directive 97/67/EC – Article 7 – Compensation for the net cost arising from universal service obligations – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market.#Joined Cases C-431/19 P and C-432/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48727

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#République française contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonds européen agricole de garantie (FEAGA) et Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2017/2014 – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République française – Correction forfaitaire au taux de 100 % – Proportionnalité – Lignes directrices de la Commission européenne relatives au calcul des corrections financières dans le cadre des procédures d’apurement de conformité et d’apurement des comptes.#Affaire C-404/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48728

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#French Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2014 – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the French Republic – 100% flat-rate correction – Proportionality – European Commission Guidelines on the calculation of the financial corrections in the framework of the conformity and financial clearance of accounts procedures.#Case C-404/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48729

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Extradition of a Union citizen to a third State – Person acquiring Union citizenship after transferring the centre of his or her interests to the Member State from which extradition is requested – Scope of EU law – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction on freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality – Information to the Member State of which the requested person is a national – Obligation on the Member State from which extradition is requested and the Member State of origin to ask the third State requesting extradition to send the criminal investigation file – No obligation.#Case C-398/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48730

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Extradition of a Union citizen to a third State – Person acquiring Union citizenship after transferring the centre of his or her interests to the Member State from which extradition is requested – Scope of EU law – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction on freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality – Information to the Member State of which the requested person is a national – Obligation on the Member State from which extradition is requested and the Member State of origin to ask the third State requesting extradition to send the criminal investigation file – No obligation.#Case C-398/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48731

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#Bundeszentralamt für Steuern contre Y-GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Remboursement de la TVA – Directive 2008/9/CE – Article 8, paragraphe 2, sous d) – Article 15 – Indication du numéro de la facture – Demande de remboursement.#Affaire C-346/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48732

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Bundeszentralamt für Steuern v Y-GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Refund of VAT – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 8(2)(d) – Article 15 – Indication of number of the invoice – Refund application.#Case C-346/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48733

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Fabio De Masi and Yanis Varoufakis v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Access to European Central Bank (ECB) documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – Article 4(3) – Exceptions – Document received by the ECB – Opinion from an external service provider – Internal use as part of deliberations and preliminary consultations – Refusal to grant access.#Case C-342/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48734

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Fabio De Masi and Yanis Varoufakis v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Access to European Central Bank (ECB) documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – Article 4(3) – Exceptions – Document received by the ECB – Opinion from an external service provider – Internal use as part of deliberations and preliminary consultations – Refusal to grant access.#Case C-342/19 P.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48735

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België e.a. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of animals at the time of killing – Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 – Article 4(1) – Obligation to stun animals before they are killed – Article 4(4) – Derogation in the context of ritual slaughter – Article 26(2) – Power of Member States to adopt national rules aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of animals in the case of ritual slaughter – Interpretation – National legislation requiring, in the case of ritual slaughter, stunning which is reversible and cannot cause death – Article 13 TFEU – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 10 – Freedom of religion – Freedom to manifest religion – Limitation – Proportionality – Lack of consensus among the Member States of the European Union – Discretion afforded to Member States – Principle of subsidiarity – Validity – Differing treatment of ritual slaughter and the killing of animals during hunting or recreational fishing activities and cultural or sporting events – No discrimination – Articles 20, 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case C-336/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48736

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België e.a. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of animals at the time of killing – Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 – Article 4(1) – Obligation to stun animals before they are killed – Article 4(4) – Derogation in the context of ritual slaughter – Article 26(2) – Power of Member States to adopt national rules aimed at ensuring more extensive protection of animals in the case of ritual slaughter – Interpretation – National legislation requiring, in the case of ritual slaughter, stunning which is reversible and cannot cause death – Article 13 TFEU – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 10 – Freedom of religion – Freedom to manifest religion – Limitation – Proportionality – Lack of consensus among the Member States of the European Union – Discretion afforded to Member States – Principle of subsidiarity – Validity – Differing treatment of ritual slaughter and the killing of animals during hunting or recreational fishing activities and cultural or sporting events – No discrimination – Articles 20, 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case C-336/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48737

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Slovenia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 343 TFEU – Privileges and immunities of the European Union – Statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 39 – Privileges and immunities of the ECB – Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Articles 2, 18 and 22 – Principle of the inviolability of the archives of the ECB – Seizure of documents at the premises of the Central Bank of Slovenia – Documents connected to the performance of the tasks of the ESCB and of the Eurosystem – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-316/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48738

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Slovenia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 343 TFEU – Privileges and immunities of the European Union – Statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 39 – Privileges and immunities of the ECB – Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Articles 2, 18 and 22 – Principle of the inviolability of the archives of the ECB – Seizure of documents at the premises of the Central Bank of Slovenia – Documents connected to the performance of the tasks of the ESCB and of the Eurosystem – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-316/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48739

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 17 décembre 2020.#Adina Onofrei contre Conseil de l’ordre des avocats au barreau de Paris e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des personnes – Liberté d’établissement – Accès à la profession d’avocat – Dispense de formation et de diplôme – Octroi de la dispense – Conditions – Réglementation nationale prévoyant la dispense en faveur des fonctionnaires et anciens fonctionnaires de catégorie A ou assimilés ayant une pratique professionnelle du droit national, sur le territoire national, dans la fonction publique nationale de l’État membre concerné ou dans une organisation internationale.#Affaire C-218/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.

48740

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Adina Onofrei v Conseil de l’ordre des avocats au barreau de Paris and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Freedom of establishment – Access to the profession of lawyer – Exemption from training and diploma requirements – Grant of the exemption – Conditions – National legislation providing for an exemption for category A civil servants and former category A civil servants or for persons treated as such with experience in the professional practice of national law, on national territory, in the national civil service of the Member State concerned or in an international organisation.#Case C-218/19.

cjeu_case · 17 декабря 2020 г.