Документы: Европейский Союз

47841

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-121/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47842

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-120/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47843

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-120/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47844

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-119/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47845

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-119/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47846

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-118/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47847

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-118/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47848

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-116/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47849

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-116/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47850

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-113/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47851

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-113/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47852

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-111/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47853

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Right to property – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-111/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47854

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-110/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47855

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-110/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47856

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47857

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47858

Case T-124/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47859

Case T-123/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.

47860

Case T-122/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Ramazani Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.