Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
47828

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.

cjeu_case ·
47829

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.

cjeu_case ·
47830

Case T-258/20: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·
47831

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Second indent of Article 239(1) – Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties – Special situation – Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation – Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect – Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory – Failure to present goods to customs.#Case C-92/20.

cjeu_case ·
47832

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Second indent of Article 239(1) – Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties – Special situation – Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation – Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect – Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory – Failure to present goods to customs.#Case C-92/20.

cjeu_case ·
47833

Case C-92/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union — Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Second indent of Article 239(1) — Reimbursement of lawfully collected customs duties — Special situation — Issuance of an authorisation for release for free circulation — Invalidation of the authorisation and issue of an authorisation for inward processing with retroactive effect — Re-exporting goods outside of the EU territory — Failure to present goods to customs)

cjeu_case ·
47834

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-124/19.

cjeu_case ·
47835

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-124/19.

cjeu_case ·
47836

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-123/19.

cjeu_case ·
47837

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-123/19.

cjeu_case ·
47838

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-122/19.

cjeu_case ·
47839

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-122/19.

cjeu_case ·
47840

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-121/19.

cjeu_case ·