Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
47621

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 February 2021.#Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-600/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
47622

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 February 2021.#Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-600/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
47623

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Raiffeisen Bank lnternational AG (Spółka Akcyjna) v UI and MB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Prohibition of abuse of a dominant position – Unfair trading conditions – Mortgage loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency and concluded between a bank and the members of an undertaking – Act void – Time-barred legal proceedings – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-329/20.

cjeu_case ·
47624

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Raiffeisen Bank lnternational AG (Spółka Akcyjna) v UI and MB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Prohibition of abuse of a dominant position – Unfair trading conditions – Mortgage loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency and concluded between a bank and the members of an undertaking – Act void – Time-barred legal proceedings – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-329/20.

cjeu_case ·
47625

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 février 2021.#Procédure pénale contre K. M.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune de la pêche – Règlement (CE) no 1224/2009 – Régime de contrôle afin d’assurer le respect des règles de la politique commune de la pêche – Utilisation à bord d’un navire de pêche d’un appareil permettant la classification automatique par taille de poissons – Article 89 – Mesures visant à assurer le respect des règles – Article 90 – Sanctions pénales – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
47626

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Criminal proceedings against K. M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy – Use on board a fishing vessel of equipment which is capable of automatically grading fish by size – Article 89 – Measures to ensure compliance – Article 90 – Criminal sanctions – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
47627

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 February 2021.#PI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Westminster Magistrates’ Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of a criminal prosecution on the basis of a detention order issued by the same authority – No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person – Consequences – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-648/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
47628

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 February 2021.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – First subparagraph of Article 22(6), read in conjunction with Article 29 – Communication of the grounds to the person concerned before taking a decision which would adversely affect that person – Article 103(1) and Article 103(3)(b) – Limitation of the customs debt – Period for notification of the customs debt – Suspension of the period – Article 124(1)(a) – Extinguishment of the customs debt where it is time-barred – Temporal application of the provision governing the grounds for suspension – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-39/20.

cjeu_case ·
47629

Case C-77/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K. M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy — Use on board a fishing vessel of equipment which is capable of automatically grading fish by size — Article 89 — Measures to ensure compliance — Article 90 — Criminal sanctions — Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
47631

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV and General Services Antwerp NV v Belgische Staat and Middlegate Europe NV v Ministerraad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Carrying out of port activities – Dockers – Access to the profession and recruitment – Arrangements for the recognition of dockers – Dockers not part of the quota of workers provided for in national legislation – Limitation of the duration of the work contract – Mobility of dockers between different port areas – Workers carrying out logistical work – Safety certificate – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Safety in port areas – Protection of workers – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-407/19 and C-471/19.

cjeu_case ·
47632

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV and General Services Antwerp NV v Belgische Staat and Middlegate Europe NV v Ministerraad.#References for a preliminary ruling from Raad van State and Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Carrying out of port activities – Dockers – Access to the profession and recruitment – Arrangements for the recognition of dockers – Dockers not part of the quota of workers provided for in national legislation – Limitation of the duration of the work contract – Mobility of dockers between different port areas – Workers carrying out logistical work – Safety certificate – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Safety in port areas – Protection of workers – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-407/19 and C-471/19.

cjeu_case ·
47633

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 February 2021.#LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40(2) – Subsequent application – New elements or findings – Concept – Documents the authenticity of which cannot be established or the source of which cannot be objectively verified – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4(1) and (2) – Assessment of the evidence – Obligation of the Member State concerned to cooperate.#Case C-921/19.

cjeu_case ·
47634

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 February 2021.#Bankia SA v Unión Mutua Asistencial de Seguros (UMAS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/71/EC – Prospectus when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading – Article 3(2) – Article 6 – Offer addressed to both retail investors and qualified investors – Content of information given in the prospectus – Action for damages – Retail investors and qualified investors – Awareness of the issuer’s economic situation.#Case C-910/19.

cjeu_case ·
47635

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 11 February 2021.#CF and DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Article 15(c) – Concept of ‘serious and individual threat’ to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict – National legislation requiring a minimum number of civilian casualties (killed and injured) in the relevant region.#Case C-901/19.

cjeu_case ·
47637

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 11 February 2021.#A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for persons – Citizenship of the Union – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 3(1)(a) – Sickness benefits – Concept – Article 4 and Article 11(3)(e) – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7(1)(b) – Right of residence for more than three months – Condition of having comprehensive sickness insurance cover – Article 24 – Equal treatment – Economically inactive national of a Member State residing legally in the territory of another Member State – Refusal by the host Member State to affiliate that person to its public sickness insurance system.#Case C-535/19.

cjeu_case ·
47638

Case C-755/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — T.H.C. v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Action brought against the rejection of a subsequent application for international protection as inadmissible — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Detention)

cjeu_case ·
47640

Joined Cases C-407/19 and C-471/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State, Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV, General Services Antwerp NV (C-407/19), Middlegate Europe NV (C-471/19) v Belgische Staat (C-407/19), Ministerraad (C-471/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 45 TFEU — Freedom of movement for workers — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Carrying out of port activities — Dockers — Access to the profession and recruitment — Arrangements for the recognition of dockers — Dockers not part of the quota of workers provided for in national legislation — Limitation of the duration of the work contract — Mobility of dockers between different port areas — Workers carrying out logistical work — Safety certificate — Overriding reasons in the public interest — Safety in port areas — Protection of workers — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·