Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
47061

Case C-949/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — M.A. v Konsul Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w N. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Visa policy — Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Article 21(2a) — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Refusal of a long-stay visa by the consul — Obligation on a Member State to guarantee a remedy before a tribunal against a decision refusing such a visa)

cjeu_case ·
47062

Case C-941/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — Czech Republic) — Samohýl group a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings 3004 and 3808 — Interpretation — Regulation (EC) No 455/2007 — Spot-on solution for cats against infestations of fleas and ticks — Therapeutic or prophylactic effects)

cjeu_case ·
47063

Case C-739/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — VK v An Bord Pleanála (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Lawyers’ freedom to provide services — Directive 77/249/EEC — Article 5 — Obligation for a visiting lawyer representing a client in domestic legal proceedings to work in conjunction with a lawyer who practises before the judicial authority in question — Limits)

cjeu_case ·
47064

Case C-708/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Aluminium foil originating in China — Slightly modified aluminium foil — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 — Admissibility — No action for annulment brought by the applicant in the main proceedings — Locus standi in an action for annulment)

cjeu_case ·
47065

Case C-572/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 — European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation — Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico — ITS Europe) v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Validation Panel of the European Commission on classification as a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) — Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — Annex — Sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 — Request for review — Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Article 22 — No administrative proceedings — Link between request for review and administrative proceedings — Refusal of SME status despite formal observance of the Recommendation 2003/361 criteria — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Handicaps usually faced by SMEs — None)

cjeu_case ·
47066

Case C-365/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin — Germany) — FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Direct payments — Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Article 24 — Young farmer having received an initial allocation of payment entitlements — Article 30(6) — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 — Article 28(2) — Further allocation of payment entitlements from the national reserve)

cjeu_case ·
47067

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) – ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Gvern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts – Debit notes – Eligible costs – Justification of the costs – Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects.#Case T-539/18.

cjeu_case ·
47068

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) – ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Gvern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts – Debit notes – Eligible costs – Justification of the costs – Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects.#Case T-539/18.

cjeu_case ·
47069

Case T-539/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v Commission (Arbitration clause — Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Govern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts — Debit notes — Eligible costs — Justification of the costs — Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects)

cjeu_case ·
47070

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 March 2021.#ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission.#Action for failure to act and for annulment – Electronic communications networks and services – Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum – Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) – Decision 2007/98/EC – Harmonised operator selection procedure – Authorisations granted to the selected operators – Decision No 626/2008/EC – Request for action to be taken – No formal notice – Adoption of a position by the Commission – Inadmissibility – Refusal to take action – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Powers of the Commission.#Case T-245/17.

cjeu_case ·
47071

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 March 2021.#ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission.#Action for failure to act and for annulment – Electronic communications networks and services – Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum – Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) – Decision 2007/98/EC – Harmonised operator selection procedure – Authorisations granted to the selected operators – Decision No 626/2008/EC – Request for action to be taken – No formal notice – Adoption of a position by the Commission – Inadmissibility – Refusal to take action – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Powers of the Commission.#Case T-245/17.

cjeu_case ·
47072

Case T-245/17: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — ViaSat v Commission (Action for failure to act and for annulment — Electronic communications networks and services — Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum — Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) — Decision 2007/98/EC — Harmonised operator selection procedure — Authorisations granted to the selected operators — Decision No 626/2008/EC — Request for action to be taken — No formal notice — Adoption of a position by the Commission — Inadmissibility — Refusal to take action — Measure not actionable — Inadmissibility — Powers of the Commission)

cjeu_case ·