Документы: Европейский Союз

46141

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Robert Klingel OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-345/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46142

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Robert Klingel OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-345/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46143

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021 (Extracts).#Bibita Group v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle – Prior international design – Ground for invalidity – Conflict with a prior design – Individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-326/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46144

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021 (Extracts).#Bibita Group v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle – Prior international design – Ground for invalidity – Conflict with a prior design – Individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-326/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46145

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Hell Energy Magyarország Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark HELL – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-323/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46146

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Hell Energy Magyarország Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark HELL – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-323/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46147

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark APO – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-282/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46148

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark APO – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-282/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46149

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Chanel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves – Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-44/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46150

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Chanel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves – Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-44/20.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46151

Case T-382/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Lee v EUIPO (Table knives, forks and spoons) (Community design — Application for a Community design representing table knives, forks and spoons — Lack of priority claim — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 67(1) and (2) Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Duty of due care)

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46152

Case T-345/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46153

Case T-326/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Bibita Group v EUIPO — Benkomers (Beverage bottles) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle — Prior international design — Ground for invalidity — Conflict with a prior design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46154

Case T-323/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hell Energy Magyarország v EUIPO (HELL) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark HELL — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46155

Case T-282/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (APO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark APO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46156

Case T-44/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Chanel v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (Representation of a circle containing two interlaced curves) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves — Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46157

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 April 2021.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONOPOLY – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/19.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46158

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 April 2021.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MONOPOLY – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-663/19.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46159

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-555/19.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.

46160

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-555/19.

cjeu_case · 21 апреля 2021 г.