Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
45184

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 June 2021.#H.R. Participations SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-109/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
45185

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 June 2021.#H.R. Participations SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-109/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
45186

Case C-344/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de commerce de Paris (France) lodged on 2 June 2021 — AA, AA, née BB, Groupe AA SNC, SI, AM, RH, RT, OE, MD, CJ, MI, Brouard-Daude SCP, acting through Xavier Brouard in his capacity as insolvency administrator of Groupe AA SNC v Allianz Bank SA, Allianz France SA, successor in law to Métropole SA, Abitbol & Rousselet SCP, acting through Frédéric Abitbol in his capacity as insolvency administrator of Groupe AA SNC, BDR & Associés, acting through Xavier Brouard in his capacity as insolvency administrator of Groupe AA SNC, SELAFA MJA, acting through Jérôme Pierrel, insolvency co-administrator of AA, SELARL Axym, acting through Didier Courtoux, insolvency co-administrator of AA, Bibus SA, formerly Matinvest, Allianz I.A.R.D. SA, successor in law to Métropole SA

cjeu_case ·
45190

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Birkenstock Sales GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-365/20.

cjeu_case ·
45191

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Birkenstock Sales GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-365/20.

cjeu_case ·
45196

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#adp Gauselmann GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GAMELAND – Earlier EU word mark Gameloft – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restriction of the services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-17/20.

cjeu_case ·
45197

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#adp Gauselmann GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GAMELAND – Earlier EU word mark Gameloft – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restriction of the services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-17/20.

cjeu_case ·
45198

Case T-365/20: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2021 — Birkenstock Sales v EUIPO (Wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for an EU trade mark consisting in wavy crisscrossing lines on the sole of a shoe — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·