Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316 981 документ
44561

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Interim relief – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone – Application of that aid scheme in breach of Commission Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-95/21 R.

cjeu_case ·
44562

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Interim relief – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone – Application of that aid scheme in breach of Commission Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-95/21 R.

cjeu_case ·
44566

Case T-95/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021 — Portugal v Commission (Interim relief — State aid — State aid scheme implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone — Application of that aid scheme in breach of Commission Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

cjeu_case ·
44567

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 22 June 2021.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-114/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
44568

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 22 June 2021.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-114/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
44570

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#VA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal prosecution on the basis of a measure involving deprivation of liberty issued by the same authority – No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person – Consequences – Effective judicial protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47.#Case C-206/20.

cjeu_case ·
44571

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#VA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal prosecution on the basis of a measure involving deprivation of liberty issued by the same authority – No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person – Consequences – Effective judicial protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47.#Case C-206/20.

cjeu_case ·
44572

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Fundamental rights – Principle of ne bis in idem – Both criminal and administrative penalties – Not applicable – Ancillary tax liabilities – Interest on a sum paid by the taxpayer in the context of criminal proceedings.#Case C-81/20.

cjeu_case ·
44573

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Fundamental rights – Principle of ne bis in idem – Both criminal and administrative penalties – Not applicable – Ancillary tax liabilities – Interest on a sum paid by the taxpayer in the context of criminal proceedings.#Case C-81/20.

cjeu_case ·
44574

Case C-206/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against VA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 8(1)(c) — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal prosecution on the basis of a measure involving deprivation of liberty issued by the same authority — No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person — Consequences — Effective judicial protection — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47)

cjeu_case ·
44575

Case C-81/20: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală, Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Fundamental rights — Principle of ne bis in idem — Both criminal and administrative penalties — Not applicable — Ancillary tax liabilities — Interest on a sum paid by the taxpayer in the context of criminal proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
44576

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Action for annulment brought by a third State – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi – Condition that the applicant must be directly concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of the action – Concept of a ‘legal person’ – Interest in bringing proceedings – Regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures.#Case C-872/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
44577

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#République bolivarienne du Venezuela v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Venezuela – Action for annulment brought by a third State – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi – Condition that the applicant must be directly concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of the action – Concept of a ‘legal person’ – Interest in bringing proceedings – Regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures.#Case C-872/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
44578

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 15 – End of a Union citizen’s temporary residence in the territory of the host Member State – Expulsion decision – Physical departure of that Union citizen from that territory – Temporal effects of that expulsion decision – Article 6 – Possibility for that Union citizen to enjoy a new right of residence on his or her return to that territory.#Case C-719/19.

cjeu_case ·
44579

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#FS v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 15 – End of a Union citizen’s temporary residence in the territory of the host Member State – Expulsion decision – Physical departure of that Union citizen from that territory – Temporal effects of that expulsion decision – Article 6 – Possibility for that Union citizen to enjoy a new right of residence on his or her return to that territory.#Case C-719/19.

cjeu_case ·
44580

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Decision to terminate a person’s residence on grounds of public policy – Preventive measures to avoid any risk of the person concerned absconding during the period allowed for that person to leave the territory of the host Member State – National provisions similar to those applicable to third-country nationals under Article 7(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC – Maximum period of detention for the purpose of removal – National provision identical to that applicable to third-country nationals.#Case C-718/19.

cjeu_case ·