Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
42921

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Criminal proceedings against FO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 3(a) – Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km – Mixed-use vehicle – Article 19(2) – Extraterritorial penalty – Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State – Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 – Recording equipment in road transport – Article 15(2) – Obligation to insert the driver card – Article 15(7) – Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an authorising inspecting officer so requests – Failure to insert the driver card into the recording equipment affecting several of the 28 days preceding the day of inspection.#Case C-906/19.

cjeu_case ·
42922

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Criminal proceedings against FO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 3(a) – Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km – Mixed-use vehicle – Article 19(2) – Extraterritorial penalty – Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State – Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 – Recording equipment in road transport – Article 15(2) – Obligation to insert the driver card – Article 15(7) – Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an authorising inspecting officer so requests – Failure to insert the driver card into the recording equipment affecting several of the 28 days preceding the day of inspection.#Case C-906/19.

cjeu_case ·
42923

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#G. Sp. z o.o. contre Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 69 – Exigibilité de la TVA – Acquisition intracommunautaire de carburants – Obligation de paiement anticipé de la TVA – Article 206 – Notion d’“acomptes provisionnels” – Article 273 – Exacte perception de la TVA et lutte contre la fraude – Marge de manœuvre des États membres.#Affaire C-855/19.

cjeu_case ·
42924

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#G. Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 69 – Chargeability of VAT – Intra-Community acquisition of motor fuels – Obligation to make early payment of VAT – Article 206 – Concept of ‘interim payments’ – Article 273 – Correct collection of VAT and prevention of evasion – Discretion of the Member States.#Case C-855/19.

cjeu_case ·
42925

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne contre GB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Protection des appellations d’origine et des indications géographiques – Caractère uniforme et exhaustif – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous a), ii) – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Évocation – Appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) “Champagne” – Services – Comparabilité des produits – Utilisation de la dénomination commerciale “Champanillo”.#Affaire C-783/19.

cjeu_case ·
42926

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of designations of origin and geographical indications – Uniform and exhaustive nature – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) – Article 103(2)(b) – Evocation – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Champagne’ – Services – Comparability of products – Use of the trade name ‘Champanillo’.#Case C-783/19.

cjeu_case ·
42927

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland contre SE.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune en matière d’asile et de protection subsidiaire – Directive 2011/95/UE – Article 2, sous j), troisième tiret – Notion de “membre de la famille” – Personne majeure demandant la protection internationale en raison de son lien familial avec un mineur ayant déjà obtenu la protection subsidiaire – Date pertinente pour apprécier la qualité de “mineur”.#Affaire C-768/19.

cjeu_case ·
42928

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Third indent of Article 2(j) – Concept of ‘family member’ – Adult applying for international protection on the basis of his or her family relationship with a minor who has already been granted subsidiary protection – Relevant date for assessing ‘minor’ status.#Case C-768/19.

cjeu_case ·
42929

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#XR contre Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, akciová společnost.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2003/88/CE – Aménagement du temps de travail – Notions de “temps de travail” et de “période de repos” – Période de pause pendant laquelle l’employé doit se tenir prêt à partir en intervention dans un délai de deux minutes – Primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-107/19.

cjeu_case ·
42930

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#XR v Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ – Break during which the employee must remain ready to respond to a call-out within a two-minute time limit – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-107/19.

cjeu_case ·
42931

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 9 September 2021.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 310(6) and Article 325 TFEU – Own resources – Customs duties – Value added tax (VAT) – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Combating fraud – Principle of effectiveness – Obligation for Member States to make own resources available to the European Commission – Financial liability of Member States in the event of losses of own resources – Imports of textiles and footwear from China – Large-scale and systematic fraud – Organised crime – Missing importers – Customs value – Undervaluation – Taxable amount for VAT purposes – Lack of systematic customs controls based on risk analysis and carried out prior to the release of the goods concerned – No systematic provision of security – Method used to estimate the amount of traditional own resources losses in respect of imports presenting a significant risk of undervaluation – Statistical method based on the average price determined at EU level – Whether permissible.#Case C-213/19.

cjeu_case ·
42934

Case C-906/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Criminal proceedings against FO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Road transport — Harmonisation of certain provisions of social legislation — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Article 3(a) — Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km — Vehicle for mixed-use — Article 19(2) — Extraterritorial penalty — Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State — Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis — Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 — Recording equipment in road transport — Article 15(2) — Obligation to insert the driver card — Article 15(7) — Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an inspecting officer so requests — Failure to insert the driver card in the recording equipment on several of the 28 days preceeding the inspection day)

cjeu_case ·
42935

Case C-855/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — G. Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 69 — Chargeability of VAT — Intra-Community acquisition of motor fuels — Obligation to make early payment of VAT — Article 206 — Concept of ‘interim payments’ — Article 273 — Correct collection of VAT and prevention of evasion — Discretion of the Member States)

cjeu_case ·
42936

Case C-783/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain) — Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Uniform and exhaustive nature — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Article 103(2)(a)(ii) — Article 103(2)(b) — Evocation — Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) ‘Champagne’ — Services — Comparability of products — Use of the trade name ‘Champanillo’)

cjeu_case ·
42937

Case C-768/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Federal Republic of Germany v SE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Third indent of Article 2(j) — Definition of ‘family member’ — Adult applying for international protection because of that adult’s family relationship with a minor who has already obtained subsidiary protection — Relevant date for assessing ‘minor’ status)

cjeu_case ·
42938

Case C-107/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9 — Czech Republic — XR v Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, akciová společnost (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ — Break during which the employee must remain ready to respond to a call-out within a two-minute time limit — Primacy of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
42939

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Adler Real Estate AG e.a. contre Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Valeurs mobilières admises à la négociation sur un marché réglementé établi ou opérant dans un État membre – Obligation de transparence – Notification des “participations importantes” acquises dans le capital de sociétés par des “personnes agissant de concert” – Directive 2004/109/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 bis, quatrième alinéa – Notion d’“exigences plus strictes” – Directive 2004/25/CE – “Surveillance” par une autorité désignée conformément à l’article 4 de cette directive.#Affaire C-605/18.

cjeu_case ·
42940

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Adler Real Estate AG and Others v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Securities admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within a Member State – Obligation of transparency – Notification of ‘major holdings’ in companies acquired by ‘persons acting in concert’ – Directive 2004/109/EC – Fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1a) – Concept of ‘more stringent’ requirements – Directive 2004/25/EC – ‘Supervision’ by an authority designated pursuant to Article 4 of that directive.#Case C-605/18.

cjeu_case ·