Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
42222

Case T-238/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Wepa Hygieneprodukte and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers — Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 — Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted — Action for annulment — Time limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Concept of ‘aid’ — State resources — Selectivity)

cjeu_case ·
42223

Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Infineon Technologies Dresden and Infineon Technologies v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers — Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of aid — State resources)

cjeu_case ·
42224

Case T-196/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AZ v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers — Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of aid — State resources — Selectivity — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations)

cjeu_case ·
42225

Case T-167/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Tempus Energy Germany and T Energy Sweden v Commission (State aid — Polish electricity market — Capacity mechanism — Decision not to raise any objections — Aid scheme — Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU — Concept of doubts — Article 4(3) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
42226

Opinion of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Istanbul Convention.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU – Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention) – Signature by the European Union – Draft conclusion by the European Union – Concept of an ‘agreement envisaged’, within the meaning of Article 218(11) TFEU – External competences of the European Union – Substantive legal basis – Article 78(2) TFEU – Article 82(2) TFEU – Article 83(1) TFEU – Article 84 TFEU – Article 336 TFEU – Articles 1 to 4a of Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice – Partial participation of Ireland in the conclusion of the Istanbul Convention by the European Union – Possibility of splitting the act concluding an international agreement into two separate decisions according to the applicable legal bases – Practice of ‘common accord’ – Compatibility with the TEU and the TFEU.#Case Avis 1/19.

cjeu_case ·
42228

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Determination of the undertakings liable to provide compensation – Action for compensation directed against the subsidiary of a parent company and brought following a decision finding only that the parent company participated in a cartel – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘economic unit’.#Case C-882/19.

cjeu_case ·
42229

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Determination of the undertakings liable to provide compensation – Action for compensation directed against the subsidiary of a parent company and brought following a decision finding only that the parent company participated in a cartel – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘economic unit’.#Case C-882/19.

cjeu_case ·
42230

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 6 octobre 2021.#Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co. KG Magyarországi Fióktelepe contre Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 90, paragraphe 1 – Réduction de la base d’imposition en cas de réduction de prix après le moment où l’opération a été effectuée – Contributions versées par une entreprise pharmaceutique à l’organisme d’assurance maladie étatique – Article 273 – Formalités administratives imposées par la réglementation nationale pour l’exercice du droit à réduction – Principes de neutralité fiscale et de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-717/19.

cjeu_case ·
42231

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co. KG Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 90(1) – Reduction of the taxable amount where the price was reduced after the supply took place – Payment made by a pharmaceutical company to the State health insurance agency – Article 273 – Administrative obligations imposed by national legislation for the exercise of the right to reduction – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case C-717/19.

cjeu_case ·
42232

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 91/271/EEC – Collection and treatment of urban waste water – Articles 3 to 5 and 10 – No collecting systems for urban water in certain agglomerations – No secondary treatment or equivalent treatment of urban waste water in certain agglomerations – Construction and operation of treatment plants – Control of discharges from such plants – Sensitive areas – More stringent treatment of waste water.#Case C-668/19.

cjeu_case ·
42233

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 91/271/EEC – Collection and treatment of urban waste water – Articles 3 to 5 and 10 – No collecting systems for urban water in certain agglomerations – No secondary treatment or equivalent treatment of urban waste water in certain agglomerations – Construction and operation of treatment plants – Control of discharges from such plants – Sensitive areas – More stringent treatment of waste water.#Case C-668/19.

cjeu_case ·
42234

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 6 octobre 2021.#Confederación Nacional de Centros Especiales de Empleo (Conacee) contre Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Passation des marchés publics – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 20 – Marchés réservés – Législation nationale réservant le droit de participer à certaines procédures de passation de marchés publics aux centres spéciaux d’emploi à initiative sociale – Conditions additionnelles non prévues par la directive – Principes d’égalité de traitement et de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-598/19.

cjeu_case ·
42235

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Confederación Nacional de Centros Especiales de Empleo (Conacee) v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa and Federación Empresarial Española de Asociaciones de Centros Especiales de Empleo (Feacem).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 20 – Reserved contracts – National legislation reserving the right to participate in certain public procurement procedures to Social initiative special employment centres – Additional conditions not provided for by the directive – Principles of equal treatment and proportionality.#Case C-598/19.

cjeu_case ·
42236

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Consorzio Italian Management and Catania Multiservizi SpA v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Question on the interpretation of EU law raised by the parties to the national proceedings after the Court has given a preliminary ruling in those proceedings – Failure to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Partial inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-561/19.

cjeu_case ·
42237

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Consorzio Italian Management and Catania Multiservizi SpA v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Question on the interpretation of EU law raised by the parties to the national proceedings after the Court has given a preliminary ruling in those proceedings – Failure to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Partial inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-561/19.

cjeu_case ·
42238

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 6 octobre 2021.#« ЕCOTEX BULGARIA » EOOD contre Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 63 TFUE – Libre circulation des capitaux – Directive (UE) 2015/849 – Champ d’application – Réglementation nationale exigeant de réaliser les paiements dépassant un certain montant exclusivement par virement ou par dépôt sur un compte de paiement – Article 65 TFUE – Justification – Lutte contre la fraude et l’évasion fiscales – Proportionnalité – Sanctions administratives à caractère pénal – Article 49 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principes de légalité et de proportionnalité des délits et des peines.#Affaire C-544/19.

cjeu_case ·
42239

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#„ЕCOTEX BULGARIA“ LTD v Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Scope – National legislation requiring payments exceeding a certain amount to be made only by transfer or deposit into a payment account – Article 65 TFEU – Justification – Combating tax evasion and tax avoidance – Proportionality – Administrative penalties of a criminal nature – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties.#Case C-544/19.

cjeu_case ·
42240

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 6 octobre 2021.#TS e.a. contre Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate et Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Assurance maladie – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Article 20, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Soins médicaux reçus dans un État membre autre que celui de résidence de la personne assurée – Autorisation préalable – Conditions – Exigence d’un rapport émis par un médecin du régime public d’assurance maladie national prescrivant un traitement – Prescription, à titre de seconde opinion médicale, émise dans un État membre autre que celui de résidence de la personne assurée, d’un traitement alternatif présentant l’avantage de ne pas causer de handicap – Remboursement intégral des frais médicaux afférents à ce traitement alternatif – Libre prestation des services – Article 56 TFUE.#Affaire C-538/19.

cjeu_case ·