Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
38622

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOOD MEDIA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-615/20.

cjeu_case ·
38623

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOOD MEDIA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-615/20.

cjeu_case ·
38624

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Genekam Biotechnology AG v European Commission.#Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Fibrogelnet project – Recovery of an amount receivable – Risk avoidance mechanism – Amount receivable effectively recovered from the Guarantee Fund – Decision establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Competence of the author of the act – Termination of the applicant’s participation in the project – Eligible costs – Reports and deliverables.#Case T-579/20.

cjeu_case ·
38625

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Genekam Biotechnology AG v European Commission.#Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Fibrogelnet project – Recovery of an amount receivable – Risk avoidance mechanism – Amount receivable effectively recovered from the Guarantee Fund – Decision establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Competence of the author of the act – Termination of the applicant’s participation in the project – Eligible costs – Reports and deliverables.#Case T-579/20.

cjeu_case ·
38626

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Medicinal products for human use – Application for conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus – sodium oxybate – Decision of refusal by the Commission – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Procedure – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Request for consultation of a specific scientific advisory group – Impartiality of members of an ad hoc committee of experts – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment.#Case T-556/20.

cjeu_case ·
38627

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Medicinal products for human use – Application for conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus – sodium oxybate – Decision of refusal by the Commission – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Procedure – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Request for consultation of a specific scientific advisory group – Impartiality of members of an ad hoc committee of experts – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment.#Case T-556/20.

cjeu_case ·
38628

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal – Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-333/20.

cjeu_case ·
38629

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal – Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-333/20.

cjeu_case ·
38630

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Huhtamaki Sàrl v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a State aid investigation – Advance tax agreements – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Not irrebuttable – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-134/20.

cjeu_case ·
38631

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Huhtamaki Sàrl v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a State aid investigation – Advance tax agreements – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Not irrebuttable – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-134/20.

cjeu_case ·
38635

Case T-579/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Genekam Biotechnology v Commission (Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Fibrogelnet project — Recovery of an amount receivable — Risk avoidance mechanism — Amount receivable effectively recovered from the Guarantee Fund — Decision establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision — Article 299 TFEU — Competence of the author of the act — Termination of the applicant’s participation in the project — Eligible costs — Reports and deliverables)

cjeu_case ·
38636

Case T-556/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — D & A Pharma v Commission and EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Application for conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus — sodium oxybate — Decision of refusal by the Commission — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Procedure — Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use — Request for consultation of a specific scientific advisory group — Impartiality of members of an ad hoc committee of experts — Manifest errors of assessment — Equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·
38637

Case T-333/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Giuliani (IALO TSP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal — Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
38638

Case T-134/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Huhtamaki v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a State aid investigation — Advance tax agreements — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Not irrebuttable — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·