Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
37701

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20.

cjeu_case ·
37702

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20.

cjeu_case ·
37703

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#KU v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – EEAS staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability.#Case T-425/20.

cjeu_case ·
37704

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#KU v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – EEAS staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability.#Case T-425/20.

cjeu_case ·
37705

Case T-735/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Planistat Europe and Charlot v Commission (Non-contractual liability — ‘Eurostat’ case — External investigation by OLAF — Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation — Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation — National criminal proceedings — Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final — No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

cjeu_case ·
37709

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.

cjeu_case ·
37710

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.

cjeu_case ·
37711

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 April 2022.#Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax – Tax exemption for interest income and royalties – Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals – Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective advantage – Right to submit comments.#Case T-508/19.

cjeu_case ·
37712

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 April 2022.#Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax – Tax exemption for interest income and royalties – Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals – Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective advantage – Right to submit comments.#Case T-508/19.

cjeu_case ·
37713

Case T-634/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — FC v EUAA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pre-disciplinary proceedings — Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities — OLAF Report — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Liability — Close link with the claim for annulment)

cjeu_case ·
37714

Case T-508/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax — Tax exemption for interest income and royalties — Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals — Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Selective advantage — Right to submit comments)

cjeu_case ·
37715

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.

cjeu_case ·
37716

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.

cjeu_case ·
37717

Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Mubarak and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt — Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds — Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·