Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161293) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43164) directive (8067)
316 838 документов
3722

Case C-712/25 PPU, Rastoshev: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad – Sofia – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against XM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution – Execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4(7)(a) – Grounds for optional non-execution – Offences which have been committed in whole or in part in the territory of the executing Member State – Risk of impunity)

cjeu_case ·
3723

Case C-56/25, Petlichev: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against MA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Principle of the primacy of EU law – National law alleged to be incompatible with the national Constitution and with EU law – Conditions for referring a matter to a constitutional court – Reasoned assessment of the consequences of the application of EU law – Prior reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling – Article 94(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Determination of the national law applicable to the dispute – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Obligation or entitlement to refer a matter to a constitutional court before making a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling – None)

cjeu_case ·
3726

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#MB v Societatea Națională [U].#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Protection against dismissal – National provisions more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers – Parental leave – National rule laying down a general and absolute prohibition on the dismissal of a worker in receipt of a reintegration incentive – Article 16 and Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No implementation of EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-861/24.

cjeu_case ·
3728

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#GT and Others v Valora Effekten Handel AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/109/EC – Harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market established or operating in a Member State – Notification of the acquisition of major holdings in companies – Acquisition of such holdings by persons acting in concert – Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph – Concept of ‘more stringent’ requirements – Laws, regulations or administrative provisions adopted in relation to takeover bids, merger transactions and other transactions affecting the ownership or control of companies.#Case C-864/24.

cjeu_case ·
3729

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principles of non-discrimination and transparency.#Case C-680/24.

cjeu_case ·
3730

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principle of non-discrimination and principle of transparency.#Case C-680/24.

cjeu_case ·
3731

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

cjeu_case ·
3732

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

cjeu_case ·
3733

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Stichting Koskea, agissant en qualité d’administrateur de ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV exerçant sous la dénomination commerciale de Reaal Schadeverzekering NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 12(1) – Obligation for personal injuries to all passengers, other than the driver, arising out of the use of a vehicle to be covered by civil liability insurance – Scope – Road traffic accident involving a single vehicle – Damage suffered by the driver of the vehicle as a result of the intervention of a passenger in the driving of the vehicle.#Case C-490/24.

cjeu_case ·
3734

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Stichting Koskea, agissant en qualité d’administrateur de ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV exerçant sous la dénomination commerciale de Reaal Schadeverzekering NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 12(1) – Obligation for personal injuries to all passengers, other than the driver, arising out of the use of a vehicle to be covered by civil liability insurance – Scope – Road traffic accident involving a single vehicle – Damage suffered by the driver of the vehicle as a result of the intervention of a passenger in the driving of the vehicle.#Case C-490/24.

cjeu_case ·
3736

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#J.J. v PKO BP S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Credit agreement – Variable-rate mortgage loan agreement – Contractual term providing for the determination of the interest rate on the basis of a benchmark within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 – Article 1(2) of Directive 93/13 – Contractual term reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13 – Concept of ‘definition of the main subject matter of the contract’ – Requirement of transparency – Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13 – Unfairness.#Case C-471/24.

cjeu_case ·
3737

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 12 février 2026.#Republik Österreich contre Austrian Airlines AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 549/2004 – Ciel unique européen – Règlement (CE) no 550/2004 – Fourniture de services de navigation aérienne dans le ciel unique européen – Article 8 – Prestataires de services de la circulation aérienne – Articles 14 et 15 – Redevances à la charge des usagers de l’espace aérien – Défaillance d’un serveur de télécommunications aéronautiques – Annulation de vols – Manquement fautif allégué de la part du prestataire concerné – Usagers de l’espace aérien – Protection de ces usagers contre les préjudices économiques causés par un tel manquement.#Affaire C-408/24.

cjeu_case ·
3738

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.

cjeu_case ·
3739

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned.#Case C-313/24.

cjeu_case ·
3740

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned.#Case C-313/24.

cjeu_case ·