Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
36725

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 May 2022.#Shanghai Panati Co. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Intervention – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) granted leave to participate in the proceedings in the case before the General Court – Time limits – Point from which time starts to run – Unforeseeable circumstances – Rejection.#Case C-103/22 P(I).

cjeu_case ·
36728

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro and Others.#Request for a preliminary reference – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Interest in bringing proceedings – Access to the review procedures – Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
36729

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Request for a preliminary reference – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Interest in bringing proceedings – Access to the review procedures – Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
36732

Case C-787/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro, Navaltagus — Reparação e Construção Naval SA, Navalrocha — Sociedade de Construção e Reparações Navais SA (Request for a preliminary reference — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 1(3) — Interest in bringing proceedings — Access to the review procedures — Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender — No interest in bringing proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
36733

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

cjeu_case ·
36734

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

cjeu_case ·
36735

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

cjeu_case ·
36736

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sector 2 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

cjeu_case ·
36737

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Others v YB and Others v YX and ZW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Joined Cases C-693/19 and C-831/19.

cjeu_case ·
36738

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Others v YB and Others v YX and ZW.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Joined Cases C-693/19 and C-831/19.

cjeu_case ·
36739

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage enforcement proceedings – Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement – Force of res judicata and time-barring – Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court – Power of review by the national court of its own motion.#Case C-600/19.

cjeu_case ·
36740

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage enforcement proceedings – Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement – Force of res judicata and time-barring – Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court – Power of review by the national court of its own motion.#Case C-600/19.

cjeu_case ·