Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
36341

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#EM v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – European Parliament – Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 7 – Transfer – Article 12 and Article 12a(3) – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Failure to assign tasks – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Request for assistance – Loss or harm – Compensation.#Case C-299/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
36342

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#SR v EW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 5 – Translation of the document – Translation costs borne by the applicant – Concept of ‘applicant’ – Service, by the court before which proceedings have been brought, of judicial documents on interveners in the proceedings.#Case C-196/21.

cjeu_case ·
36343

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#SR v EW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 5 – Translation of the document – Translation costs borne by the applicant – Concept of ‘applicant’ – Service, by the court before which proceedings have been brought, of judicial documents on interveners in the proceedings.#Case C-196/21.

cjeu_case ·
36345

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Get Fresh Cosmetics Limited v Valstybinė vartotojų teisių apsaugos tarnyba.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 87/357/EEC – Article 1(2) – Scope – Non-food products that may be confused with foodstuffs – Concept – Risk of suffocation, poisoning, or the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract – No presumption of danger – Proof.#Case C-122/21.

cjeu_case ·
36346

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#X BV v Classic Coach Company and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 5 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Article 6(2) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Impossibility for the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent a third party from using, in the course of trade, an earlier right applying in a particular locality – Requirements – Concept of ‘earlier right’ – Trade name – Proprietor of a later trade mark with an even earlier right – Relevance.#Case C-112/21.

cjeu_case ·
36347

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#X BV v Classic Coach Company and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 5 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Article 6(2) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Impossibility for the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent a third party from using, in the course of trade, an earlier right applying in a particular locality – Requirements – Concept of ‘earlier right’ – Trade name – Proprietor of a later trade mark with an even earlier right – Relevance.#Case C-112/21.

cjeu_case ·
36348

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/75/EU – Article 3(9) – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Procedure for amending a permit – Participation of the public concerned – Concept of ‘substantial change’ to the installation – Extension of the duration of operation of a landfill.#Case C-43/21.

cjeu_case ·
36349

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/75/EU – Article 3(9) – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Procedure for amending a permit – Participation of the public concerned – Concept of ‘substantial change’ to the installation – Extension of the duration of operation of a landfill.#Case C-43/21.

cjeu_case ·
36350

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 2 June 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v MA and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Articles 27 and 29 – Transfer of the person concerned to the Member State responsible for the examination of his or her request – Suspension of the transfer due to the COVID – 19 pandemic – Impossibility of carrying out the transfer – Judicial protection – Consequences for the time limit for transfer.#Joined Cases C-245/21 and C-248/21.

cjeu_case ·
36352

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 June 2022.#I. L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 15(1) – Detention – Grounds for detention – General criterion based on the risk that the effective enforcement of the removal would be compromised – Risk that the person concerned would commit a criminal offence – Consequences of the establishment of the offence and the imposition of a penalty – Complication of the removal process – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restriction of the fundamental right to liberty – Requirement of a legal basis – Requirements of clarity, predictability and accessibility – Protection against arbitrariness.#Case C-241/21.

cjeu_case ·
36353

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 2 June 2022.#DN v Finanzamt Österreich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Articles 67 and 68 – Family benefits – Right to benefits under a pension – Pensioner in receipt of pensions from two Member States – Member State(s) in which that pensioner is entitled to family benefits – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Third sentence of Article 60(1) – Legislation of a Member State providing for the award of family benefits to the parent who has taken the child into his or her household – Failure by that parent to claim the award of those benefits – Obligation to take into account the application submitted by the other parent – Request for the recovery of family benefits paid to the other parent – Whether permissible.#Case C-199/21.

cjeu_case ·
36354

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 2 June 2022.#Christian Louboutin v Amazon Europe Core Sàrl and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg and Tribunal de l’entreprise francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 9(2)(a) – Rights conferred by an EU trade mark – Concept of ‘use’ – Operator of an online sales website incorporating an online marketplace – Advertisements published on that marketplace by third-party sellers using, in those advertisements, a sign which is identical with a trade mark of another person for goods which are identical with those for which that trade mark is registered – Perception of that sign as forming an integral part of the commercial communication of that operator – Method of presenting the advertisements which does not make it possible to distinguish clearly the offerings of that operator from those of the third-party sellers.#Joined Cases C-148/21 and C-184/21.

cjeu_case ·
36355

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 2 June 2022.#Comité interprofessionnel des huiles essentielles françaises (CIHEF) and Others v Ministre de la Transition écologique and Premier ministre.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 72 – Free movement of goods – Article 34 TFEU – Possibility for Member States to adopt restrictive measures on commercial and advertising practices – Selling arrangements falling outside the scope of Article 34 TFEU – Whether justified – Article 36 TFEU – Objective of protecting human and animal health and the environment – Proportionality.#Case C-147/21.

cjeu_case ·
36356

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 June 2022.#QB v Mercedes-Benz Group AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Exhaust gas recirculation valve (EGR valve) – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Method of calculating compensation – Principle of effectiveness – Article 267 TFEU – Admissibility – Reference to the Court from a single judge.#Case C-100/21.

cjeu_case ·
36357

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 June 2022.#O.T. E. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Directive 2004/81/EC – Article 6 – Scope – Third-country national claiming to be the victim of an offence related to the trafficking in human beings – Entitlement to the reflection period provided for in Article 6(1) of that directive – Prohibition on enforcing an expulsion measure – Definition – Scope – Calculation of that reflection period – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person – Transfer to the Member State responsible for examining that application for international protection.#Case C-66/21.

cjeu_case ·
36358

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 2 June 2022.#MC v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT – Article 325(1) TFEU – Obligation to counter illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the European Union – VAT debts of a taxable legal person – National legislation which provides for the joint and several liability of the non-taxable manager of the legal person – Transfers made in bad faith by the manager – Depletion of the legal person’s assets leading to insolvency – Failure to pay the amounts of VAT payable by the legal person within the prescribed time limits – Default interest – Proportionality.#Case C-1/21.

cjeu_case ·
36359

Case C-573/21 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 — Marie-Christine Arnautu v European Parliament (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Law governing the institutions — Implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament — Article 33(1) and (2) — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of undue payments — Plea of illegality — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Assessment of the evidence — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

cjeu_case ·
36360

Case C-541/21 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 — Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Law governing the institutions — Implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament — Article 33(1) and (2) — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of undue payments — Plea of illegality — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Assessment of the evidence — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

cjeu_case ·