Документы: Европейский Союз

35841

Case T-602/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Kubara v EUIPO (good calories) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark good calories — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations)

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35842

Case T-479/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Haswani v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial)

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35843

Case T-356/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Future Motion v EUIPO — El Corte Inglés (HYPERCORE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark HYPERCORE — Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35844

Case T-329/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — V. Fraas (FRAAS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark FRAAS — Genuine use of a mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use)

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35845

Case T-29/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Beveland v EUIPO — Super B (BUCANERO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark BUCANERO — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Proof of genuine use)

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35846

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 22 June 2022.#European Parliament v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) 2021/92 – Fixing for 2021 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters – Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures – Articles 15 to 17 and 20 and the second paragraph of Article 59 – Article 43(3) TFEU – Misuse of powers – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-259/21.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35847

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 22 June 2022.#Porr Bau GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Graz-Umgebung.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Directive 2008/98/EC – Point 1 of Article 3 – Article 5(1) – Article 6(1) – Excavated materials – Concepts of ‘waste’ and of ‘by-product’ – Cessation of waste status.#Case C-238/21.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35848

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-739/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35849

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-739/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35850

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 June 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework – No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-657/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35851

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 June 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework – No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-657/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35852

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35853

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35854

Case T-739/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Unite the Union v EUIPO — WWRD Ireland (WATERFORD) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark WATERFORD — Action for annulment — Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility — Trade mark liable to mislead the public — Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35855

Case T-657/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair II; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air-transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework — No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35856

Case T-502/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. — Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods and services — No aesthetic complementarity — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rights of the defence)

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35857

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#European Commission v Slovak Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 6(2) and (3) – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 2009/147/EC – Article 4(1) – Conservation of wild birds – Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) – Forest management strategies – Emergency felling – Appropriate assessment of their implications – Natura 2000 sites – Special protection areas designated for the conservation of the capercaillie – Absence of measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats and of special conservation measures in certain areas.#Case C-661/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35858

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#European Commission v Slovak Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 6(2) and (3) – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 2009/147/EC – Article 4(1) – Conservation of wild birds – Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) – Forest management strategies – Emergency felling – Appropriate assessment of their implications – Natura 2000 sites – Special protection areas designated for the conservation of the capercaillie – Absence of measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats and of special conservation measures in certain areas.#Case C-661/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35859

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.

35860

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.

cjeu_case · 22 июня 2022 г.