Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
33164

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#James C. Callaway v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common agricultural policy – Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – Plant varieties – Producer of the hemp variety Finola – Areas cultivated in Poland – Hemp varieties eligible for financial support under the common agricultural policy – Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content – Authorisation given to Poland to prohibit the marketing of the Finola variety in its territory – Not directly concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-653/21.

cjeu_case ·
33165

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#James C. Callaway v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common agricultural policy – Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – Plant varieties – Producer of the hemp variety Finola – Areas cultivated in Poland – Hemp varieties eligible for financial support under the common agricultural policy – Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content – Authorisation given to Poland to prohibit the marketing of the Finola variety in its territory – Not directly concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-653/21.

cjeu_case ·
33168

Case T-653/21: Order of the General Court of 20 October 2022 — Callaway v Commission (Action for annulment — Common agricultural policy — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Plant varieties — Producer of the hemp variety Finola — Areas cultivated in Poland — Hemp varieties eligible for financial support under the common agricultural policy — Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content — Authorisation given to Poland to prohibit the marketing of the Finola variety in its territory — Not directly concerned — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
33170

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by the Portuguese Republic – Alleged infringement of the rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Out of time – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-576/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
33171

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by the Portuguese Republic – Alleged infringement of the rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Out of time – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-576/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
33172

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v AB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension.#Case C-374/21.

cjeu_case ·
33173

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v AB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension.#Case C-374/21.

cjeu_case ·
33174

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#UP v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Asylum application – Rejection – Order to leave the territory – Article 6(4) – Application for leave to remain for the purpose of medical treatment – Admissible application – Issuance of temporary leave to remain while the application is being examined – Dismissal of application – Social assistance – Refusal – Condition relating to the legality of the stay – No return decision – Effect of temporary leave to remain on the order to leave the territory.#Case C-825/21.

cjeu_case ·
33175

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#UP v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Asylum application – Rejection – Order to leave the territory – Article 6(4) – Application for leave to remain for the purpose of medical treatment – Admissible application – Issuance of temporary leave to remain while the application is being examined – Dismissal of application – Social assistance – Refusal – Condition relating to the legality of the stay – No return decision – Effect of temporary leave to remain on the order to leave the territory.#Case C-825/21.

cjeu_case ·
33178

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#A Oy v B Ky and Joint heirs of C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 12(4) – Temporal scope – Practice established before 16 March 2013 consisting in not recovering interest for late payment or compensation for recovery costs – Practice applied to individual orders placed on or after that date – Article 7(2) and (3) – Grossly unfair contractual terms and practices – Waiver freely agreed to.#Case C-406/21.

cjeu_case ·
33179

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#A Oy v B Ky and Joint heirs of C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 12(4) – Temporal scope – Practice established before 16 March 2013 consisting in not recovering interest for late payment or compensation for recovery costs – Practice applied to individual orders placed on or after that date – Article 7(2) and (3) – Grossly unfair contractual terms and practices – Waiver freely agreed to.#Case C-406/21.

cjeu_case ·
33180

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#EKOFRUKT v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Article 25(1) – Article 26 – Annex I – Legal effects of electronic signatures – Requirements relating to an advanced electronic signature – Administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature not meeting the requirements for a ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Cumulative requirements – Consequences – Article 3(15) – Absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’ – Entry of a qualified electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider – Effect – Names of the holder of the electronic signature which have been transliterated using Latin script rather than being written in Cyrillic script as they normally are.#Case C-362/21.

cjeu_case ·