Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 документов
32902

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Grupa 'LEW' S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark GRUPALEW. – Earlier national figurative mark LEW – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use – Article 10(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-672/21.

cjeu_case ·
32903

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Grupa 'LEW' S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark GRUPALEW. – Earlier national figurative mark LEW – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use – Article 10(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-672/21.

cjeu_case ·
32904

Case T-672/21: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2022 — Grupa ‘Lew’ v EUIPO — Lechwerke (GRUPALEW.) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark GRUPALEW. — Earlier national figurative mark LEW — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use — Article 10(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
32905

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C and B and X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Detention of third-country nationals – Fundamental right to liberty – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15 – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28 – Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure – Ex officio review – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21.

cjeu_case ·
32906

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C and B and X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State and Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Detention of third-country nationals – Fundamental right to liberty – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15 – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28 – Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure – Ex officio review – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21.

cjeu_case ·
32907

Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State, Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C, B (C-704/20), X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-39/21) (References for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Detention of third-country nationals — Fundamental right to liberty — Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 15 — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 9 — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 — Article 28 — Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure — Ex officio review — Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

cjeu_case ·
32908

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid implemented by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Advantage – Selectivity – Arm’s length principle – Reference framework – National law applicable – ‘Normal’ taxation.#Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
32909

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid implemented by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Advantage – Selectivity – Arm’s length principle – Reference framework – National law applicable – ‘Normal’ taxation.#Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
32910

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Access to justice – Article 9(3) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47, first paragraph – Right to effective judicial protection – Environmental association – Standing of such an association to bring an action before a national court against EC type-approval granted to certain vehicles – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2)(a) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Valve for exhaust gas recirculation (EGR valve) – Reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Authorisation of such a device where the need is justified in terms of protecting the engine against damage or accident and for safe operation of the vehicle – State of the art.#Case C-873/19.

cjeu_case ·
32911

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Access to justice – Article 9(3) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47, first paragraph – Right to effective judicial protection – Environmental association – Standing of such an association to bring an action before a national court against EC type-approval granted to certain vehicles – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2)(a) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Valve for exhaust gas recirculation (EGR valve) – Reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Authorisation of such a device where the need is justified in terms of protecting the engine against damage or accident and for safe operation of the vehicle – State of the art.#Case C-873/19.

cjeu_case ·
32912

Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022 — Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe v Ireland (Appeal — State aid — Aid implemented by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery — Tax ruling — Advantage — Selectivity — Arm's length principle — Reference framework — National law applicable — ‘Normal’ taxation)

cjeu_case ·
32913

Case C-873/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Aarhus Convention — Access to justice — Article 9(3) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47, first paragraph — Right to effective judicial protection — Environmental association — Standing of such an association to bring an action before a national court against EC type-approval granted to certain vehicles — Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 — Article 5(2)(a) — Motor vehicles — Diesel engine — Pollutant emissions — Valve for exhaust gas recirculation (EGR valve) — Reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ — Defeat device — Authorisation of such a device where the need is justified in terms of protecting the engine against damage or accident and for safe operation of the vehicle — State of the art)

cjeu_case ·
32917

Council Decision (EU) 2022/2200 of 8 November 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on proposals for modifications to UN regulations Nos 0, 13, 24, 34, 43, 48, 67, 83, 90, 118, 125, 127, 129, 149, 151, 158, 159, 161, 162 and 163, on a proposal for a new UN regulation on Vulnerable Road Users in Front and Side Close Proximity, on a proposal for a new UN Regulation on the Approval of Motor Vehicles with Regard to their Direct Vision, and on a proposal for an amendment to M.R.1

decision ·
32920

Council Decision (EU) 2022/2197 of 8 November 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the technical and procedural specifications of the use of the Internal Market Information System (IMI) by the United Kingdom and the amount and modalities of the financial contribution to be made by the United Kingdom to the general budget of the Union in respect of the cost generated by its use of IMI

decision ·