Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 946 документов
31461

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Council of the European Union and European Commission v FI.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 20 of Annex VIII – Grant of a survivor’s pension – Surviving spouse of a former official who had been in receipt of invalidity allowance – Marriage entered into after that official had become eligible for invalidity allowance – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death – Article 19 of Annex VIII – Marriage entered into before the official became eligible for invalidity allowance – No condition as to the minimum duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 20 – Principle of equal treatment – Article 21(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Article 52(1) – No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature.#Joined Cases C-313/21 P and C-314/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
31462

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Council of the European Union and European Commission v FI.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 20 of Annex VIII – Grant of a survivor’s pension – Surviving spouse of a former official who had been in receipt of invalidity allowance – Marriage entered into after that official had become eligible for invalidity allowance – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death – Article 19 of Annex VIII – Marriage entered into before the official became eligible for invalidity allowance – No condition as to the minimum duration of the marriage – Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 20 – Principle of equal treatment – Article 21(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Article 52(1) – No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature.#Joined Cases C-313/21 P and C-314/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
31463

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA) – Sociedade Gestora de Organismos de Investimento Coletivo SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/7/EC – Article 5(2)(a) – Indirect taxes on the raising of capital – Stamp duty on services relating to the marketing of shares in undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities.#Case C-656/21.

cjeu_case ·
31464

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA) – Sociedade Gestora de Organismos de Investimento Coletivo SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/7/EC – Article 5(2)(a) – Indirect taxes on the raising of capital – Stamp duty on services relating to the marketing of shares in undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities.#Case C-656/21.

cjeu_case ·
31465

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Fourth indent of Article 5 – Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use – Optional tax exemptions and reductions – Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-553/21.

cjeu_case ·
31466

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Fourth indent of Article 5 – Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use – Optional tax exemptions and reductions – Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-553/21.

cjeu_case ·
31467

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#WP v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale and Repubblica italiana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Central Bank (ECB) staff members – Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme to the ECB pension scheme – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – ECB Conditions of Employment – Article 8 of Annex IIIa – No provision of national law or agreement between the Member State concerned and the ECB.#Case C-404/21.

cjeu_case ·
31468

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#WP v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale and Repubblica italiana.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Asti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Central Bank (ECB) staff members – Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme to the ECB pension scheme – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – ECB Conditions of Employment – Article 8 of Annex IIIa – No provision of national law or agreement between the Member State concerned and the ECB.#Case C-404/21.

cjeu_case ·
31469

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#TJ v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 90/270/EEC – Article 9(3) – Work with display screen equipment – Protection of workers’ eyes and eyesight – Special corrective appliances – Spectacles – Acquisition by the employee – Arrangements for the employer to meet the costs.#Case C-392/21.

cjeu_case ·
31470

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#TJ v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 90/270/EEC – Article 9(3) – Work with display screen equipment – Protection of workers’ eyes and eyesight – Special corrective appliances – Spectacles – Acquisition by the employee – Arrangements for the employer to meet the costs.#Case C-392/21.

cjeu_case ·
31471

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Sambre & Biesme SCRL and Commune de Farciennes v Société wallonne du logement (SWL).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Award of a public contract without a tendering procedure – Public contracts between entities within the public sector – Article 12(3) – Public contracts awarded in house – Concept of ‘similar control’ – Conditions – Representation of all the participating contracting authorities – Article 12(4) – Contract between contracting authorities pursuing common public interest objectives – Concept of ‘cooperation’ – Conditions – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period – Direct effect.#Joined Cases C-383/21 and C-384/21.

cjeu_case ·
31472

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Sambre & Biesme SCRL and Commune de Farciennes v Société wallonne du logement (SWL).#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Award of the contract without initiating a tendering procedure – Public contracts between entities within the public sector – Article 12(3) – Public contracts subject to in-house awards – Concept of ‘similar control’ – Conditions – Representation of all participating contracting authorities – Article 12(4) – Contract between contracting authorities pursuing common public interest objectives – Concept of ‘cooperation’ – Conditions – Failure to transpose within the time limits laid down – Direct effect.#Joined Cases C-383/21 and C-384/21.

cjeu_case ·
31473

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Quadrant Amroq Beverages SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Directive 92/83/EEC – Harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages – Excise duty – Ethyl alcohol – Exemptions – Article 27(1)(e) – Production of flavours for the preparation of foodstuffs and non-alcoholic beverages with an alcohol strength not exceeding 1.2% volume – Scope – Principles of proportionality and effectiveness.#Case C-332/21.

cjeu_case ·
31474

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Quadrant Amroq Beverages SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Directive 92/83/EEC – Harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages – Excise duty – Ethyl alcohol – Exemptions – Article 27(1)(e) – Production of flavours for the preparation of foodstuffs and non-alcoholic beverages with an alcohol strength not exceeding 1.2% volume – Scope – Principles of proportionality and effectiveness.#Case C-332/21.

cjeu_case ·
31476

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#X v Udlændingenævnet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Article 9 – Decision No 1/80 – Article 10(1) – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Family reunification – National rule introducing new more restrictive conditions in the area of family reunification for spouses of Turkish nationals who hold a permanent residence permit in the Member State concerned – Requirement that Turkish workers successfully take a test demonstrating a certain level of knowledge of the official language of that Member State – Justification – Objective of ensuring successful integration.#Case C-279/21.

cjeu_case ·
31477

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#X v Udlændingenævnet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Article 9 – Decision No 1/80 – Article 10(1) – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Family reunification – National rule introducing new more restrictive conditions in the area of family reunification for spouses of Turkish nationals who hold a permanent residence permit in the Member State concerned – Requirement that Turkish workers successfully take a test demonstrating a certain level of knowledge of the official language of that Member State – Justification – Objective of ensuring successful integration.#Case C-279/21.

cjeu_case ·
31480

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v S.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Request sent to a Member State by a third State for the extradition of a Union citizen who is a national of another Member State and who has exercised his right to free movement in the first of those Member States – Request made for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction of freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality.#Case C-237/21.

cjeu_case ·