Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
29930

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Violetta Prigozhina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family of a person responsible for actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-212/22.

cjeu_case ·
29931

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Violetta Prigozhina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family of a person responsible for actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-212/22.

cjeu_case ·
29934

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-98/22.

cjeu_case ·
29935

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-98/22.

cjeu_case ·
29936

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-96/22.

cjeu_case ·
29937

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-96/22.

cjeu_case ·
29938

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-95/22.

cjeu_case ·
29939

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-95/22.

cjeu_case ·
29940

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-94/22.

cjeu_case ·