Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
29446

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 March 2023.#Domaine Boyar International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BOLGARÉ – Previous designation of origin ‘Bolgheri’ – Article 8(4a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 46(1)(d) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.#Case T-300/22.

cjeu_case ·
29447

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 March 2023.#Domaine Boyar International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BOLGARÉ – Previous designation of origin ‘Bolgheri’ – Article 8(4a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 46(1)(d) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.#Case T-300/22.

cjeu_case ·
29448

Case T-300/22: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2023 — Domaine Boyar International v EUIPO — Consorzio DOC Bolgheri e Bolgheri Sassicaia (BOLGARÉ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark BOLGARÉ — Previous designation of origin ‘Bolgheri’ — Article 8(4a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 46(1)(d) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013)

cjeu_case ·
29449

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 March 2023.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-732/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
29450

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 March 2023.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-732/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
29453

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 23 March 2023.#XT and Others v Keolis Agen SARL.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes d’Agen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Carry-over of entitlements to paid annual leave in the event of long-term illness – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 31(2).#Joined Cases C-271/22 to C-274/22.

cjeu_case ·
29454

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 23 March 2023.#Nexive Commerce Srl and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal services in the European Union – Directive 97/67/EC – Fourth indent of the second subparagraph of Article 9(2) and Article 9(3) – Article 22 – Undertakings in the postal sector – Contribution to the operational costs of the regulatory authority for the postal sector – Obligation – Financial burden borne exclusively by market participants, without distinction according to the type of services provided – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination.#Case C-226/22.

cjeu_case ·
29455

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 23 March 2023.#Criminal proceedings against.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Directive 2013/48/EU – Scope – National legislation which does not refer to the concept of a suspect – Preliminary stage of the criminal proceedings – Coercive measure of personal search and seizure – Retrospective authorisation by the court having jurisdiction – Lack of judicial review of measures to obtain evidence – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective exercise of the rights of defence of suspects and of accused persons during the judicial review of measures to obtain evidence.#Case C-209/22.

cjeu_case ·
29456

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 23 March 2023.#Finanzamt Hamm v Harry Mensing.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 311 et seq. – Special arrangements for works of art – Margin scheme – Taxable dealers – Supply of works of art by creators or their successors in title – Intra-Community transactions – Right to deduct input tax.#Case C-180/22.

cjeu_case ·
29457

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 23 March 2023.#TT v AK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 10 and 15 – Transfer to a court of another Member State better placed to hear the case – Conditions – Court of the Member State to which the child has been wrongfully removed – The 1980 Hague Convention – Best interests of the child.#Case C-87/22.

cjeu_case ·
29458

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 23 March 2023.#RTG v Tuk Tuk Travel SL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 5 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Termination of a package travel contract – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic – Right to terminate the contract – Request for full refund – Information obligation on the travel organiser – Article 12 – Application in national law of the principles of the delimitation of the subject matter of an action by the parties and of the correlation between the claims put forward in the action and the rulings contained in the operative part – Effective protection of the consumer – Examination of its own motion by the national court – Conditions.#Case C-83/22.

cjeu_case ·
29459

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 23 March 2023.#OP v Notariusz Justyna Gawlica.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – National law applicable in matters of succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 22 – Choice-of-law clause – Scope ratione personae – Third-country national – Article 75 – Relationship with existing international conventions – Bilateral agreement between the Republic of Poland and Ukraine.#Case C-21/22.

cjeu_case ·
29460

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 23 March 2023.#Est Wind Power OÜ v AS Elering.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aid granted by Member States – Renewable energy subsidy – Construction of a wind farm – Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020’ – Paragraph 19(44) and footnote 66 – Concepts of ‘start of works’, ‘construction works on the investment’, ‘other commitment that makes the investment irreversible’ and ‘necessary state authorisation for constructing the project’ – Type and intensity of the scrutiny that must be conducted by the competent national authority.#Case C-11/22.

cjeu_case ·