Документы: Европейский Союз

28541

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 May 2023.#TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – SARS-Cov-2 virus – Quarantine measure – Impossible to carry over the paid annual leave granted for a period coinciding with a period of quarantine.#Case C-206/22.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28542

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 4 May 2023.#OP v Commune d'Ans.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief – Public sector – Terms of employment of a public administration prohibiting the visible wearing of any philosophical or religious sign in the workplace – Islamic headscarf – Requirement of neutrality in contacts with the public, hierarchical superiors and colleagues.#Case C-148/22.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28543

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 4 May 2023.#QB v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a), second indent – Temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Conditions for granting – Main occupation – Work done for another State.#Case C-88/22 P.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28544

Case C-127/22, Balgarska telekomunikatsionna kompania: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Balgarska telekomunikatsionna kompania’ EAD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 185 — Adjustment of deductions of input VAT — Goods written off — Subsequent sale as waste — Destruction or disposal duly proved or confirmed)

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28545

Case C-100/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 — KY v Court of Justice of the European Union (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 77 — Pension — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Transfer of national pension rights to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions — Crediting of additional pensionable years — Article 2 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Pension calculation — Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations — The ‘minimum subsistence figure’ rule — Request for reimbursement of the portion of the transferred pension rights not reflected in the EU pension amount — Unjust enrichment)

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28546

Case C-99/22, Kapniki A. Michailidis: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 — Article 3(3) — Validity — Common organisation of the markets — Raw tobacco — Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco — Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased — Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations)

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28547

Case C-78/22, ALD Automotive: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze — Czech Republic) — ALD Automotive s.r. o. v DY, acting as insolvency administrator of the debtor company GEDEM-STAV a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/7/EU — Combating late payments in commercial transactions — Article 6 — Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 as compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor — Late payment regarding contracts for successive performance — Fixed compensation due in respect of each late payment — Obligation to give full effect to EU law — Obligation of interpretation in compliance with EU law — General principles of national private law)

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28548

Case C-60/22, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Court electronic mailbox): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 5 — Principles relating to processing — Controllership — Article 6 — Lawfulness of processing — Electronic file compiled by an administrative authority relating to an asylum application — Transmission to the competent national court via an electronic mailbox — Infringement of Articles 26 and 30 — No arrangement determining joint responsibility for processing and maintaining the record of processing activities — Consequences — Article 17(1) — Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’) — Article 18(1) — Right to restriction of processing — Concept of ‘unlawful processing’ — Taking into account of the electronic file by a national court — Absence of consent of the data subject)

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28549

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#OP e.a. contre Glavna direktsia « Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto » kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Aménagement du temps de travail – Directive 2003/88/CE – Article 1er, paragraphe 3 – Champ d’application – Article 8 – Article 12 – Sécurité et santé des travailleurs de nuit au travail – Niveau de protection des travailleurs de nuit adapté à la nature de leur travail – Directive 89/391/CEE – Article 2 – Travailleurs du secteur public et travailleurs du secteur privé – Article 20 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Égalité de traitement.#Affaires jointes C-529/21 à C-536/21 et C-732/21 à C-738/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28550

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#OP and Others v Glavna direktsia 'Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto' kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad - Kula.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 1(3) – Scope – Article 8 – Article 12 – Health and safety of night workers at work – Level of protection for night workers appropriate to the nature of their work – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2 – Public sector workers and private sector workers – Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-529/21 to C-536/21 and C-732/21 to C-738/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28551

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#Finanzamt X contre Y.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 135, paragraphe 2, premier alinéa, sous c) – Exceptions à l’exonération prévue à l’article 135, paragraphe 1, sous l) – Location d’outillages et de machines fixés à demeure dans le cadre de l’affermage d’un bâtiment agricole.#Affaire C-516/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28552

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#Finanzamt X v Y.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 135(2), first subparagraph, point (c) – Exceptions to the exemption provided for in Article 135(1)(l) – Letting of permanently installed equipment and machinery in the context of the leasing of an agricultural building.#Case C-516/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28553

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#F.F. v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data subject’s right of access to his or her data undergoing processing – Article 15(3) – Provision of a copy of the data – Concept of ‘copy’ – Concept of ‘information’.#Case C-487/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28554

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#F.F. v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data subject’s right of access to his or her data undergoing processing – Article 15(3) – Provision of a copy of the data – Concept of ‘copy’ – Concept of ‘information’.#Case C-487/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28555

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#European Central Bank v Crédit lyonnais.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Calculation of the leverage ratio – Exposure measure – Article 429(14) – Exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions – Partial refusal of authorisation – Discretion of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Action for annulment – Manifest error of assessment – Judicial review.#Case C-389/21 P.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28556

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#European Central Bank v Crédit lyonnais.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Calculation of the leverage ratio – Exposure measure – Article 429(14) – Exclusion of exposures meeting certain conditions – Partial refusal of authorisation – Discretion of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Action for annulment – Manifest error of assessment – Judicial review.#Case C-389/21 P.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28557

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#UI contre Österreichische Post AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 82, paragraphe 1 – Droit à réparation du dommage causé par le traitement de données effectué en violation de ce règlement – Conditions du droit à réparation – Insuffisance d’une simple violation dudit règlement – Nécessité d’un préjudice causé par ladite violation – Réparation d’un dommage moral résultant d’un tel traitement – Incompatibilité d’une règle nationale subordonnant la réparation d’un tel dommage au dépassement d’un seuil de gravité – Règles de fixation des dommages-intérêts par les juges nationaux.#Affaire C-300/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28558

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#UI v Österreichische Post AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing that infringes that regulation – Conditions governing the right to compensation – Mere infringement of that regulation not sufficient – Need for damage caused by that infringement – Compensation for non-material damage resulting from such processing – Incompatibility of a national rule making compensation for such damage subject to the exceeding of a threshold of seriousness – Rules for the determination of damages by national courts.#Case C-300/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28559

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#TU et SU contre BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA et Next Capital Solutions Ltd.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Procédure d’exécution forcée d’un contrat de prêt valant titre exécutoire – Opposition à l’exécution – Contrôle des clauses abusives – Principe d’effectivité – Réglementation nationale ne permettant pas au juge de l’exécution de contrôler le caractère éventuellement abusif d’une clause au-delà du délai imparti au consommateur pour former opposition – Existence d’un recours de droit commun imprescriptible permettant au juge du fond d’exercer un tel contrôle et d’ordonner la suspension de l’exécution forcée – Conditions qui ne rendent pas impossible en pratique ou excessivement difficile l’exercice des droits conférés par le droit de l’Union – Exigence d’une caution à charge du consommateur pour suspendre la procédure d’exécution.#Affaire C-200/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.

28560

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#TU and SU v BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA and Next Capital Solutions Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a loan agreement constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to the enforcement – Review of unfair terms – Principle of effectiveness – National legislation not permitting the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to review the possible unfairness of a clause beyond the time limit imposed on a consumer for lodging an objection – Existence of an action under ordinary law that cannot become time-barred enabling the court hearing the substance of the case to carry out such a review and to order suspension of the enforcement – Conditions which do not render impossible in practice or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by EU law – Requirement for the consumer to pay a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-200/21.

cjeu_case · 4 мая 2023 г.