Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
26981

Case T-34/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Cunsorziu di i Salamaghji Corsi — Consortium des Charcutiers Corses and Others v Commission (Protected geographical indication — Protected designation of origin — Applications for protection of the geographical indications ‘Jambon sec de l’Île de Beauté’, ‘Lonzo de l’Île de Beauté’ and ‘Coppa de l’Île de Beauté’ — Earlier protected designations of origin ‘Jambon sec de Corse — Prisuttu’, ‘Lonzo de Corse — Lonzu’ and ‘Coppa de Corse — Coppa di Corsica’ — Eligibility of names — Evocation — Article 7(1)(a) and Article 13(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 — Scope of the Commission’s control of the applications for registration — Article 50(1) and Article 52(1) of Regulation No 1151/2012 — Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
26982

Case T-27/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Innovaciones Cosmético Farmacéuticas v EUIPO — Benito Oliver (th pharma) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark TH PHARMA — Earlier national figurative mark TH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
26983

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark aTmos – Earlier national trade names aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH and aTmos – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts by the Office of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-694/21.

cjeu_case ·
26984

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark aTmos – Earlier national trade names aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH and aTmos – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts by the Office of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-694/21.

cjeu_case ·
26985

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Hungary – No double funding – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 28(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Aid for afforestation – Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Aid for greening – Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Cumulation of aid.#Case T-491/21.

cjeu_case ·
26986

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Hungary – No double funding – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 28(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Aid for afforestation – Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Aid for greening – Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Cumulation of aid.#Case T-491/21.

cjeu_case ·
26987

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Michele Vendrame v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Final report of the investigation by OLAF into the performance of a service contract financed by the EDF – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-379/21.

cjeu_case ·
26988

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Michele Vendrame v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Final report of the investigation by OLAF into the performance of a service contract financed by the EDF – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-379/21.

cjeu_case ·
26989

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Eurecna SpA v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Final report of the investigation by OLAF into the performance of a service contract financed by the EDF – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-377/21.

cjeu_case ·
26990

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Eurecna SpA v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Final report of the investigation by OLAF into the performance of a service contract financed by the EDF – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-377/21.

cjeu_case ·
26991

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 July 2023.#IFIC Holding AG v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country – Restrictive measures taken by the United States against Iran – Secondary sanctions preventing natural or legal persons of the European Union from having commercial relationships with undertakings targeted by those measures – Prohibition on complying with such legislation – Second paragraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 – Commission decision authorising a legal person of the European Union to comply with that legislation – Obligation to state reasons – Retroactive effect of authorisation – Account taken of the interests of the undertaking targeted by the restrictive measures of the third country – Right to be heard.#Case T-8/21.

cjeu_case ·
26992

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 July 2023.#IFIC Holding AG v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country – Restrictive measures taken by the United States against Iran – Secondary sanctions preventing natural or legal persons of the European Union from having commercial relationships with undertakings targeted by those measures – Prohibition on complying with such legislation – Second paragraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 – Commission decision authorising a legal person of the European Union to comply with that legislation – Obligation to state reasons – Retroactive effect of authorisation – Account taken of the interests of the undertaking targeted by the restrictive measures of the third country – Right to be heard.#Case T-8/21.

cjeu_case ·
26993

Case T-694/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik v EUIPO — aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik (aTmos) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark aTmos — Earlier national trade names aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH and aTmos — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 53(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Examination of the facts by the Office of its own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
26994

Case T-491/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Hungary v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Hungary — No double funding — Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 28(1)(b) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 — Aid for afforestation — Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 — Aid for greening — Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Cumulation of aid)

cjeu_case ·
26995

Case T-379/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Vendrame v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Final report of the investigation by OLAF into the performance of a service contract financed by the EDF — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
26996

Case T-377/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Eurecna v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Final report of the investigation by OLAF into the performance of a service contract financed by the EDF — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
26997

Case T-8/21: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — IFIC Holding v Commission (Commercial policy — Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country — Restrictive measures taken by the United States against Iran — Secondary sanctions preventing natural or legal persons of the European Union from having commercial relationships with the undertakings subject to those measures — Prohibition on complying with such legislation — Second paragraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 — Commission decision authorising a legal person of the European Union to comply with that legislation — Obligation to state reasons — Retroactive effect of the authorisation — Taking into account of the interests of the undertaking subject to the restrictive measures taken by the third country — Right to be heard)

cjeu_case ·