Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
25281

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2023.#Sastela, proizvodnja peciva in tort, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Tante Mitzi Caffè CAFFÈ – STRUDEL – BARETTO – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts relied on or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-510/22.

cjeu_case ·
25282

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2023.#Sastela, proizvodnja peciva in tort, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Tante Mitzi Caffè CAFFÈ – STRUDEL – BARETTO – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts relied on or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-510/22.

cjeu_case ·
25285

Case T-510/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2023 — Sastela v EUIPO — Zenergo (Tante Mitzi Caffè CAFFÈ — STRUDEL — BARETTO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark Tante Mitzi Caffè CAFFÈ — STRUDEL — BARETTO — Lack of genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Facts relied on or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
25287

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 October 2023.#European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Steel products market – Import of certain steel products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Prolongation of a safeguard measure – Necessity – Threat of serious injury – Adjustment measures – European Union interest – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-598/21.

cjeu_case ·
25288

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 October 2023.#European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Steel products market – Import of certain steel products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Prolongation of a safeguard measure – Necessity – Threat of serious injury – Adjustment measures – European Union interest – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-598/21.

cjeu_case ·
25291

Case T-598/21: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2023 — Euranimi v Commission (Protective measures — Steel products market — Imports of certain steel products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029 — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Admissibility — Prolongation of a safeguard measure — Necessity — Threat of serious injury — Adjustment measures — Interest of the European Union — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
25293

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 October 2023.#Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 – Absence of an EFSA conclusion – Transparency obligation – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA – Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case – Interim report on an ongoing study – Precautionary principle – Burden of proof and matter to be proved – Manifest error of assessment – Applicability of the read-across approach and of the weight-of-evidence approach – Possibility of relying on the ECHA and EFSA guidelines.#Case T-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
25294

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 October 2023.#Ascenza Agro, SA and Industrias Afrasa, SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 – Absence of an EFSA conclusion – Transparency obligation – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA – Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case – Interim report on an ongoing study – Precautionary principle – Burden of proof and matter to be proved – Manifest error of assessment – Applicability of the read-across approach and of the weight-of-evidence approach – Possibility of relying on the ECHA and EFSA guidelines.#Case T-77/20.

cjeu_case ·
25295

Case T-77/20: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2023 — Ascenza Agro and Industrias Afrasa v Commission (Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 — Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to examine all the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation No 1107/2009 — Absence of an EFSA conclusion — Transparency obligation — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Divergent risk assessments by the rapporteur Member State and EFSA — Obligation to take into account all the relevant factors of the case — Interim report on an ongoing study — Precautionary principle — Burden of proof and matter to be proved — Manifest error of assessment — Applicability of the read-across approach and of the weight-of-evidence approach — Possibility of relying on the ECHA and EFSA guidelines)

cjeu_case ·