Документы: Европейский Союз

316838 документа
2123

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 22 avril 2026.#Mariano Barranco Rodriguez et Pablo Barranco Schnitzler contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative G MOTION – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative antérieure GM Germany Motions – Causes de nullité relative – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), et article 60, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Absence d’atteinte à la renommée – Article 8, paragraphe 5, et article 60, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-349/25.

cjeu_case ·
2124

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Mariano Barranco Rodriguez and Pablo Barranco Schnitzler v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G MOTION – Earlier EU figurative mark GM Germany Motions – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-349/25.

cjeu_case ·
2125

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Mokoryte SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable amount – Reduction in case of cancellation, refusal, non-payment or reduction of the price – Article 90(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Acquisition by a subcontractor of a claim held by a contractor against the developer – Irrecoverable claim – Right of the subcontractor to benefit from the reduction in the taxable amount.#Case T-233/25.

cjeu_case ·
2126

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Mokoryte SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable amount – Reduction in case of cancellation, refusal, non-payment or reduction of the price – Article 90(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Acquisition by a subcontractor of a claim held by a contractor against the developer – Irrecoverable claim – Right of the subcontractor to benefit from the reduction in the taxable amount.#Case T-233/25.

cjeu_case ·
2127

Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 22 avril 2026.#Crocs, Inc. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une chaussure – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 dans sa version antérieure au règlement (UE) 2024/2822 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-228/25.

cjeu_case ·
2128

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shoe – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-228/25.

cjeu_case ·
2132

Case T-349/25: Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2026 – Barranco Rodriguez and Barranco Schnitzler v EUIPO – Snowacki and Others (G MOTION) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G MOTION – Earlier EU figurative mark GM Germany Motions – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
2133

Case T-233/25, Mokoryte: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 22 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj – Romania) – Mokoryte SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Ministerul Finanţelor – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable amount – Reduction in case of cancellation, refusal, non-payment or reduction of the price – Article 90(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Acquisition by a subcontractor of a claim held by a contractor against the developer – Irrecoverable claim – Right of the subcontractor to benefit from the reduction in the taxable amount)

cjeu_case ·
2136

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Inspection ordered by the Commission – Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003 – Inspection continued at the Commission’s premises – Commission refusal to reimburse part of the costs resulting from that inspection – Concept of ‘additional costs incurred solely as a result of the continuation of an inspection on the Commission’s premises’.#Case T-682/24.

cjeu_case ·
2137

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Inspection ordered by the Commission – Article 20(4) Regulation No 1/2003 – Inspection continued at the Commission’s premises – Commission refusal to reimburse part of the costs resulting from that inspection – Concept of ‘additional costs incurred solely as a result of the continuation of an inspection at the Commission’s premises’.#Case T-682/24.

cjeu_case ·
2138

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Viktor Arkadievich Chevtsov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/24.

cjeu_case ·
2139

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Viktor Arkadievich Chevtsov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/24.

cjeu_case ·
2140

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24.

cjeu_case ·