Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
20465

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier.#Case C-76/23.

cjeu_case ·
20466

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier.#Case C-76/23.

cjeu_case ·
20467

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Remia Com Impex SRL v Autoritatea Naţională Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor and Direcţia Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor Dolj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Hygiene rules for food of animal origin – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Scope – Exceptions – Supply of food between retail establishments constituting a marginal, localised and restricted activity – Concept of ‘marginal, localised and restricted activity’ – National legislation departing from the definition of that concept provided by that regulation.#Case C-10/23.

cjeu_case ·
20468

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Remia Com Impex SRL v Autoritatea Naţională Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor and Direcţia Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor Dolj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Hygiene rules for food of animal origin – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Scope – Exceptions – Supply of food between retail establishments constituting a marginal, localised and restricted activity – Concept of ‘marginal, localised and restricted activity’ – National legislation departing from the definition of that concept provided by that regulation.#Case C-10/23.

cjeu_case ·
20469

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Marvesa Rotterdam NV v Federaal Agentschap voor de veiligheid van de voedselketen (FAVV).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Approximation of health legislation – Animal health policy – Veterinary checks – Products of animal origin imported from China – Import ban – Decision 2002/994/EC – Exemption for certain products – Part I of the annex – Fishery products – Definition – Fish oil – Products intended for animal feed – Validity.#Case C-7/23.

cjeu_case ·
20470

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Marvesa Rotterdam NV v Federaal Agentschap voor de veiligheid van de voedselketen (FAVV).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Approximation of health legislation – Animal health policy – Veterinary checks – Products of animal origin imported from China – Import ban – Decision 2002/994/EC – Exemption for certain products – Part I of the annex – Fishery products – Definition – Fish oil – Products intended for animal feed – Validity.#Case C-7/23.

cjeu_case ·
20471

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 21 March 2024.#Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and Issam Abdelmouine v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Complaint concerning State aid that enabled a football club to hire a player previously employed by another club – Complaint lodged by one of the socios of the latter club, set up as a not-for-profit association – European Commission decision finding that no ‘interested party’ entitled to lodge a complaint is present – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1(h) – Notions of ‘interested party’ and ‘person whose interests might be affected by the granting of aid’.#Case C-224/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
20472

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 21 March 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.

cjeu_case ·
20474

Case C-76/23,  Cobult: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier)

cjeu_case ·
20475

Case C-10/23,  Remia Com Impex: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Romania) – Remia Com Impex SRL v Autoritatea Naţională Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor (ANSVSA) and Direcţia Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor Dolj (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Hygiene rules for food of animal origin – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Scope – Exceptions – Supply of food between retail establishments constituting a marginal, localised and restricted activity – Concept of ‘marginal, localised and restricted activity’ – National legislation departing from the definition of that concept provided by that regulation)

cjeu_case ·
20476

Case C-7/23, Marvesa Rotterdam: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State - Belgium) – Marvesa Rotterdam NV v Federaal Agentschap voor de veiligheid van de voedselketen (FAVV) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Approximation of health legislation – Animal health policy – Veterinary checks – Products of animal origin imported from China – Import ban – Decision 2002/994/EC – Exemption for certain products – Part I of the annex – Fishery products – Definition – Fish oil – Products intended for animal feed – Validity)

cjeu_case ·
20477

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#S.R.G. v Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer credit agreements – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(g), Article 10(2)(g) and Article 23 – Total cost of the credit to the consumer – No indication of the relevant costs – Penalty – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1), Article 4(2), Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Point 1(o) of the annex to Directive 93/13/EEC – Services ancillary to a credit agreement – Terms giving priority to the examination of the credit application of a consumer purchasing those services and to the making available of the sum borrowed as well as providing that consumer with the option of deferring or rescheduling the monthly loan instalments, in return for payment of additional costs.#Case C-714/22.

cjeu_case ·
20478

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#S.R.G. v Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer credit agreements – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(g), Article 10(2)(g) and Article 23 – Total cost of the credit to the consumer – No indication of the relevant costs – Penalty – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1), Article 4(2), Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Point 1(o) of the annex to Directive 93/13/EEC – Services ancillary to a credit agreement – Terms giving priority to the examination of the credit application of a consumer purchasing those services and to the making available of the sum borrowed as well as providing that consumer with the option of deferring or rescheduling the monthly loan instalments, in return for payment of additional costs.#Case C-714/22.

cjeu_case ·
20479

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception.#Case C-703/22.

cjeu_case ·
20480

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception.#Case C-703/22.

cjeu_case ·