India - Jharia Mine Fire Control Technical Assistance Project

Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: 17545 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) March 30, 1998 Energy Unit South Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (January 1998) Currency Unit = Rupees (Rs.) One Rupee = US$0.0256 One US Dollar = 39.05 Rs. FISCAL YEAR (January 1 December 31) WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 cubic meter = 1,308 cubic yards 1 metric tonne (t) = 1,000 kilograms (kg) 1 metric tonne (t) = 2204.6 pounds 1 kilometer (km) = 0.62 mile ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BCCL - Bharat Coking Coal Limited CIL - Coal India Limited FY - Fiscal Year GOI - Government of India ICB - International Competitive Bidding IDA - International Development Association MOC - Ministry of Coal MOP - Memorandum of the President NGO - Non-Government Organization Vice President: Mieko Nishimizu Countrv Director: Edwin Lim Sector Manager: Alastair J. McKechnie Task Manager: - Christopher Wardell  FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (i) Introduction .............................................................(i) Project Objectives .............................................................(i) Implementation Experience and Results .............................................................(ii) Summary of Findings, Future Operations and Key Lessons Learned ............ ........... (iii) PART I - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT I A. Project Objectives .I B. Achievement of Project Objectives .2 C. Implementation Record and Major Factors Affecting the Project. 2 Factors not Subject to Borrower's Control .2 Factors Subject to Borrower's Control .2 D. Project Sustainability .3 E. IDA Performance .3 F. Borrower Performance .3 G. Performance of Consultants .4 H. Assessment of Outcome .4 1. Future Operations .5 J. Key Lessons Learned .5 PART 11 - STATISTICAL ANNEXES 6 Table 1: Summary of Assessments ..................................... ......................... 7 Table 2: Related Bank Loans/IDA Credits .............................................................. 8 Table 3: Project Timetable ................... .......................................... 8 Table 4: Credit Disbursements ......................... ..................................... 8 Table 5: Key Indicators for Project Implementation ............................... ................. 9 Table 6: Studies Included in Project . ............................................................. 9 Table 7A: Project Costs .............................................................. 0 Table 7B: Project Financing ................... .......................................... 10 Table 8: Status of Credit Covenants ..........................................1................... 1 Table 9: IDA Resources: Staff Inputs ............................................................. 12 Table 10: IDA: Missions ............................................................. 12 Annex 1: ICR Mission Aide-Memoire ................................. ................................... 13 Annex 2: Borrower's Contribution to the ICR .................................................................... 15 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) Preface This is the Implementation Completion Report (ICR) for the Jharia Mine Fire Control Technical Assistance Project in India, for which Credit 2450-IN in the amount of SDR 8.6 million (US$12.0 million equivalent) was approved on December 17, 1992, and made effective on August 18, 1993. The Credit was closed on September 30, 1998, as compared to the original closing date of June 30, 1995. Final disbursement took place on February 24, 1998. The Credit balance of approximately SDR 3.0 million (US$4.0 million equivalent) was canceled. The ICR was prepared by Mr. Christopher Wardell, Industry and Mining Division, Energy, Mining and Telecommunications Department, Vice Presidency for Finance and Private Sector Development. It was reviewed by Mr. Alastair McKechnie, Energy Sector Manager, South Asia Region. The Borrower provided comments that are included as an Annex to the ICR. Preparation of this ICR was undertaken during an ICR mission in January 1998. It is based on material in the project file. The project implementing agency contributed to the preparation of the ICR by frankly exchanging views on project preparation, procurement, project implementation, performance of consultants and next steps, by commenting on the draft ICR, and by preparing its own evaluation of the project's preparation and execution.  IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) Executive Summary Introduction (a) India's resources of prime coking coal are concentrated in the Jharia coalfield in Bihar. The mining of these reserves is threatened by one of the world's largest concentrations of mine fires associated with both underground and open-pit coal operations. The fires are caused by spontaneous heating of coal seams and carbonaceous material in overlying shales. Heating of coal left in pillars and in exposed open-pit highwalls (many in abandoned mines that litter shallow areas in Jharia and represent the result of private sector slaughter mining prior to nationalization) has been rampant since the early 20th century. Efforts to contain the fires have been only partially successful and consequently the areas above the coal mining areas have in many areas collapsed as fires progress laterally and vertically; resultant fissures through to the surface providing additional access of air, accelerating the speed at which the fires spread. (b) The government and Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), the project implementing agency, were not only concerned about the loss of valuable reserves of coking coal and the ensuing need to increase coking coal imports but also about the damage that the fires inflict on the environment. The fires contribute to air pollution in the Jharia area. Ground collapse above the fire areas results in serious surface subsidence and the need for extensive reclamation. In addition, the fires and related collapse phenomenon put the inhabitants of certain areas of the Jharia coalfield as well as important infrastructure (ores, rail lines, businesses and housing etc.) in an unsafe disposition and at serious risk of disaster. About 1 million people inhabit the fire-affected Jharia coalfield area, and if the fires cannot be contained, over 20,000 families would need resettlement and rehabilitation. Project Objectives (c) The primary objective of the project was to set the stage for investments aimed at extinguishing or containing the mine fires. Recognizing the considerable environmental damage resulting from the mine fires and related subsidence, a parallel objective was to prepare an environmental management program to identify measures to mitigate adverse environmental and social impacts and thus to assist BCCL and government in their preparation for resettlement of a growing number of people.  (ii) (d) As a technical assistance project, credit covenants were general and not designed to monitor organizational, technical or financial aspects of the Borrower's mining operations. Macro, sector and institutional project objectives were not specifically designed although it was recognized that with a technical assistance project focusing on major environmental and social issues and mitigation, such developments would occur. The project design was neither complex nor particularly demanding for the Borrower. Implementation Experience and Results (e) Notwithstanding delays in establishing credit effectiveness, in mobilizing technical assistance consultants, in contracting and scheduling drilling services, and the fact that time did not permit consultants to develop detailed cost/benefit analyses, the project was successful since it achieved its major objectives (Section B). The extent of mine fires and costs associated with their extinguishment/containment have been defined, and related environmental and social mitigation measures have been developed. The project has facilitated strong government focus on the enormity of the challenge to address the environmental and resettlement issues at Jharia. (f) The project has been completed at a cost of US$10.99 million equivalent, compared to the forecast (MOP) project cost of US$14.30 million equivalent (Table 7A). The cost reduction is due primarily to lower than anticipated equipment, survey and support services contracts and the lack of necessity to utilize project contingencies. Project completion occurred in June 1996 and was followed by project review workshops in North America and in India in May 1997. This compares to the originally scheduled project completion in December 1994. (g) A number of factors contributed to delayed project implementation (Section C). Credit signing and effectiveness were delayed. Procurement of international consultants was delayed because of issues relating to consultant contract liability provisions. Further delay occurred due to Borrower misunderstandings regarding contracting of drilling services under IDA procurement guidelines. Drill programs took longer than anticipated due to additional drilling that had to be performed to complete assessment of mine fires, which extended the drill program schedule. (h) In general, the performance of IDA, the Borrower, and project consultants was satisfactory throughout project implementation (Sections E, F and G). The Borrower handled procurement efficiently considering its lack of familiarity with IDA guidelines, supervised and cooperated effectively with international consultants and field investigation contractors, and undertook effective public consultation procedures with state government, union leaders, tribals and NGO officials. IDA staff assisted in developing a meaningful project concept and scope and in helping the Borrower focus on project objectives and in escalating government attention to the serious environmental and social issues associated with the Jharia coalfield area. The main weaknesses of IDA were in not developing a realistic project implementation schedule and in repeatedly changing staff assigned to the project. The main weakness of the Borrower was in not completing original terms of reference by  (iii) addressing costs/benefits of mine fire control, although it is recognized that IDA staff did not provide appropriate guidance in this respect. (i) On the basis that the major project objectives have been met, the project outcome is rated as satisfactory. BCCL/government are preparing to develop detailed Action Plans for implementation of fire control, environmental and social mitigation programs identified under project. Summary of Findings, Future Operations and Key Lessons Learned (j) With the clear definition of the extent of mine fires at Jharia and preliminary engineering estimates of costs associated with their extinguishment/containment, together with a clear definition of the nature and costs of related environmental and social issues, BCCL is now in a position to prepare detailed Action Plans for implementation of a program of fire control, environmental and social mitigation. Detailed terms-of-reference for such Action Plans are under preparation for review with government. Following project completion, the government allocated funds to begin to address the serious environmental and social issues, and smaller-scale fire control/subsidence projects are under implementation. A pilot resettlement scheme is being implemented by BCCL under a Ministry of Coal (MOC) special emergency Fund. A MOC Higher Level Committee has prepared a report to address the serious issues at Jharia which is under review by the government. Government is now in a position to design a major program of investments to address environmental and social issues identified under the project (Sections H and I). (k) The key lessons to be learned are that, for technical assistance projects, a realistic project implementation schedule is important; procurement needs to be initiated prior to loan effectiveness; and it is important that a project implementing agency has developed a clear understanding of IDA procurement guidelines. The importance of inter-phasing Borrower base project data, field investigations and programs, with technical assistance specialist inputs cannot be over-stressed (Section J).  IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) Part I - Project Implementation Assessment A. Project Objectives 1. Based on the very serious and unprecedented world-wide nature of mine fires in the Jharia coalfield in Bihar and the considerable impact of these fires on both ongoing mining activities, surface infrastructure, and on the people inhabiting the area, the key project objective was to set the stage for investments aimed at extinguishing or containing the mine fires. In view of the considerable adverse effects of the fires on the environment, a parallel objective was to prepare a program to identify measures to mitigate adverse environmental and social impacts, and thus to provide assistance to Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) and to the State Government in their preparation for resettlement of a growing number of people, including tribals, living in the fire- endangered areas of the Jharia coalfield. 2. As such, the project had two key components: (i) development of a fire-fighting program and (ii) development of an environmental management program. The fire-fighting program was designed to develop a recommended approach to extinguish or control fires, estimate its cost, and quantify expected financial/economic benefits (in terms of valuable coking coal salvaged, damage to the environment and infrastructure facilities as well as rehabilitation of affected people). The program would concentrate first on fires likely to cause the largest potential loss of valuable coking coal to BCCL and to pose the greatest threat to people, the environment and to infrastructure facilities. Following identification of costs and benefits of individual fire extinguishment/containment, BCCL would prepare fire control project reports to facilitate mobilization of investments. A least-cost environmental management program would assess the massive damage (pollution, land instability, social impact) resulting fTom the mine fires, assess the magnitude of the environmental and social impact of mining and related mine fires, and systematically evaluate options to mitigate the impacts, particularly large-scale resettlement of affected people.  2 B. Achievement of Project Objectives 3. Due to focused project supervision by IDA and project commitment by the government and Borrower, project objectives have been essentially achieved. A clear definition of the extent and growth of individual fires has been successfully completed and specific costs, based on preliminary engineering estimates, have been delineated to extinguish or contain the many fires. The enormity of related environ-mental and resettlement measures required has been quantified. These measures, together with those required to extinguish or control mine fires are estimated to involve an expenditure of the order of US$1 billion. Access to valuable coking coal reserves totaling 1.5 billion tonnes (value in the domestic market exceeding US$2 billion in 1998 terms) is inhibited by the extent of the mine fires. Detailed economic (cost/benefit) analysis of fire control and environmental/social mitigation measures could not be undertaken within the time frame of the project. Project implementation has generated strong focus on the critical nature of environmental and social issues at Jharia by central, state and district government officials. Recognizing the complex nature and extent of these serious issues, a Higher Level Committee was formed in late- 1996, under the Secretary, Ministry of Coal. Project implementation culminated in a series of formal project review workshops in USA (Pittsburgh) and India (Delhi, Calcutta, and Dhanbad) and a Final Review Workshop Report enabled BCCL, with assistance from project consultants, to focus senior government officials' attention on the serious and complex natuie of the fires and on steps, including necessary investments, to address the mine fires and related environrmental and social mitigation measures. On this basis, the project outcome is satisfactory (para. 11). C. Implementation Record and Major Factors Affecting the Project 4. Based on the clear definition of the nature, extent and costs of addressing Jharia mine fires and related environmental (land subsidence and reclamation) and social (resettlement and rehabilitation) concerns, the implementation record of the project is satisfactory. Detailed cost/benefit analysis could not be undertaken within the time frame of the project, even following three loan extensions, due primarily to delays in loan effectiveness, procurement of technical assistance, and the complex nature of the fire investigation programs undertaken. 5. Factors not Subject to the Borrower's Control.. During the early phase of project implementation, serious procurement (goods and services) delays occurred due to misunderstandings regarding IDA procurement guidelines, consultant contract liability provisions, and drill program contracting. Additional (40 per cent) drilling was required to precisely determine the extent of mine fires which extended the field investigations and disrupted scheduled consultant reviews. 6. Factors Subject to Borrower Control. Delays occurred in (i) declaring the credit effective, (ii) appointing a panel of international advisory experts (in accordance with the Project Agreement) and (iii) appointing a government Advisory Panel (in accordance with the Development Credit Agreement). Toward the conclusion of the project implementation, consultants were not pressed to deliberate cost/benefit analyses (as required under the contract terms-of-reference) to prepare an outline justification for Action Plans/investment for the implementation of fire control and environmental/social mitigation programs.  3 D. Project Sustainability 7. The question of project sustainability is not specifically relevant to a technical assistance project. However, with the clear definition of the extent and complexity and appropriate treatment options for the Jharia mine fires and of related environmental and social mitigation measures, necessary groundwork has been prepared to facilitate the development of Action Plans for implementation of fire control and environmental/social mitigation measures and the economic cost/benefits of such programs. The government and BCCL are now developing terms-of-reference for local/international experts to prepare specific Action Plans for implementation of fire control and environmental mitigation programs. E. IDA Performance 8. The performance of IDA can be considered generally satisfactory throughout project preparation, appraisal, and project implementation. The main weaknesses of IDA were (i) not preparing a realistic project implementation schedule (three credit extensions were required to accommodate the original work program) and (ii) repeatedly changing task management/project staff, which proved particularly critical towards project completion. IDA supervision after September 1996 could have helped the Borrower understand the need for and benefits of outlining cost/benefit analyses of mine fire control and environmental/social mitigation programs. Otherwise, IDA provided strong guidance and support to BCCL and facilitated escalation of the serious nature of the Jharia mine fires (and particularly related environmental and social issues) to senior government officials. No mid-term review was undertaken. IDA participated in the project review workshops in North America but unfortunately did not participate in important review workshops held subsequently in India and chaired by senior government officials. It can be noted also that project files are deficient in terms of being able to accurately track the history and supervision of project implementation and are particularly deficient in terms of development of any appreciation of the project outcome. F. Borrower Performance 9. BCCL participated actively throughout all stages of project preparation, appraisal and supervision and cooperated successfully with project consultants. The Borrower handled credit effectiveness (signing of a subsidiary credit agreement and provision of a legal opinion) in a manner that incurred initial project delays. Procurement of equipment and services to support the major technical assistance programs was handled in a generally satisfactory manner but delays occurred due to misunderstandings regarding IDA procurement guidelines and procurement processing. In its review of social and, to a degree, environmental issues, BCCL captured effectively public consultation/participation in the evaluation of options for mitigation programs. State government officials, union leaders, tribals and past and future resettlement peoples were consulted regularly and particularly during Final Workshop review meetings held in Calcutta and Dhanbad. The Borrower's main weakness was toward project completion, failing to recognize the importance of cost/benefit analyses to provide justification to a program to implement fire control and related environmental/social mitigation measures. However, following project completion, BCCL has  4 continued to work closely with central and state government officials to develop projects for mine fire control and subsidence abatement, and to develop and arrange funding for resettlement of affected people. To facilitate implementation of fire control and subsidence/resettlement schemes, BCCL appointed a General Manager - Coalfield Reconstruction to be responsible for implementation of ongoing and future fire control, environmental and social mitigation projects. G. Performance of Consultants 10. Project consultants provided a very clear definition of the extent of mine fires and preliminary costs for their extinguishment/containment, and for addressing environmental and social issues resulting from ongoing mining operations and related mine fires. Fires affecting ongoing mining operations, infrastructure and people were identified. Necessary related subsidence, reclamation and resettlement mitigation measures were clearly identified and specific recommendations made for improved air and water quality control. Important recommendations were formulated also for the provision of potable water supply to local inhabitants and for improved dust control due to excessive traffic in the coalfield region. Specific proposals were developed and documented to guide BCCL in its future monitoring and control of environmental and social (resettlement and rehabilitation) mitigation management programs. Fire-affected areas have been clearly defined in terms of criticality and Final Reports are well focused and detailed. Time did not permit the development of detailed cost/benefit analysis to justify programs to address the mine fires and related issues, but it is worthy to reiterate that neither the Borrower nor IDA provided appropriate guidance in this respect during the latter stages of project implementation. H. Assessment of Outcome 11. The outcome of the project can be considered satisfactory. Mine fire control measures and costs were delineated and environmental and social mitigation measures defined. The Borrower and central/state governments are now in a strong position to understand and appreciate fully the enormity of the challenge to address the mine fires at Jharia and the related environmental/social issues, and the mitigation measures required to address them. Following project completion, BCCL has continued an active dialogue with central/state governments and NGOs regarding an implementation program for mine fire control and environmental/social mitigation programs. Government has committed funds (US$9 million equivalent) to initiate a pilot resettlement program (including illegal settlers on BCCL land holdings) and funding (US$4-5 million equivalent) for ongoing, smaller-scale fire-fighting and subsidence control projects in immediately critical areas. BCCL and government recognize that these preliminary initiatives need to be followed by a major program for fire control and environmental and social mitigation measures, and that a detailed Action Plan in this respect needs to be developed to provide technical, environmental, social and economic justification for the program. At the time of finalization of this ICR, BCCL and government are scheduling discussions regarding terms-of-reference for BCCL to develop these important Action Plans with further assistance and guidance from international experts and for government to consider options for funding this major program.  5 I. Future Operation 12. Following the publication of the report of the Committee established by the government to investigate the issues relating to the Raniganj and Jharia coalfield operations, BCCL plans to develop a clear Action Plan to address Jharia mine fires and the related social and environmental mitigation needs, including identification of an investment program for its implementation. IDA will continue dialogue with CIL/BCCL and government regarding implementation of this important fire control and environmental/social mitigation program at Jharia. J. Key Lessons Learned 13. A key lesson to be learned is the importance of developing a realistic project implementation time schedule. Procurement of services and goods prior to loan effectiveness can obviate serious delays at the outset of the project and obviate credit extensions necessitated to simply complete original scopes of work. In addition, a clear understanding by Borrowers of local and ICB procurement procedures is critical, prior to loan effectiveness. A related lesson to be learned for technical assistance projects is that the inter-phasing of Borrower data collection, consultant services, and equipment procurement/field investigations is critical to avoid interruptions in technical assistance inputs and scheduling. 14. The project has also highlighted the importance, in coal-producing countries world-wide, of the development of clear and effective policy, regulatory and institutional arrangements for environmental/social management, and of the need for and benefit of fiscal policies making provision for funds for environmental and social mitigation programs, necessitated by the impact of historical, uncontrolled mining activities.  IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) Part II - Statistical Annexes  7 Table 1: Summary of Assessments A. Achievements of Objectives Substantial Partial Negligible Not applicable Macro policies Ol El O Sector policies O E 0 O Financial objectives C1 E O E Institutional development Iz3 0 0 0 Physical objectives 1I3 0 O O Poverty reduction El E 0l E3! Gender issues E1 E 0 IX] Other social objectives E O E E Environmental objectives Ix! 0 E O Public sector management O E3 0 E Private sector management [1 0 0 3 Highly B. Project sustainability Satisfactory Satisfactory Deficient E Highly C. Bank performance Satisfactory Satisfactory Deficient Identification E E3 El Preparation Assistance E I1 E Appraisal E I E Supervision E E3 E Highly D. Borrower performance Satisfactory Satisfactory Deficient Preparation E 13 0 Implementation E E3 E Covenant compliance E E3 0 Operation (if applicable) O 0 EE Highly E. Assessment of outcome Satisfactory Satisfactory Deficient 0 IX! 0  8 Table 2: Related Bank Loans Loan\Title Purpose Year of Status Approval Preceding Operations Ln. 2393-IN Dudhichua Coal Open-pit Coal Mine Development 1984 Completed Ln. 2498-IN Jharia Coking Open-pit/Underground Coal Mine Development 1985 Completed Coal Ln. 2796-IN Coal Quality Open-pit Mine Development/Coking Coal 1987 Completed Improvement Imports Following Operations Cr. 2862-IN Coal Sector Sustainable environmental and social coal mine 1996 Ongoing Environmental and Social development Mitigation Ln. 4226/Cr. 2986-IN Coal Open-pit mine development/coal sector reforms 1997 Board 9/97 Sector Rehabilitation Loan Signing 3/98 Anticipated effectiveness _ 6/98 Table 3: Project Timetable Steps in Project cycle Date planned Date actual/latest estimate Identification 1/92 1/92 Appraisal 6/92 6/92 Negotiations 11/92 11/92 Board presentation 12/92 12/92 Signing 1/93 4/93 Effectiveness 2/93 8/93 Midterm review Project completion 12/94 6/97 Loan closing 6/95 9/97 Table 4: Loan Disbursements: Cumulative Estimated and Actual (US $ million) FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Appraisal 2.8 9.4 12.0 - Actual 0 0.5 1.8 3.6 7.4 8.2 Actual as % of estimate 0 5.3 15.0 30.0 61.6 68.3 Date of final disbursement 2/24/98 _  Table 5: Key Indicators for Project Implementation Specific project implementation indicators were not outlined in the MOP and only simple timetable indicators developed during project implementation. Table 6: Studies Included in Project Study Purpose Status Impact of Study Mine Fire Control Identify areas of mine fires, evaluate options to extinguish/contain fires, prepare cost Completed ) Provided groundwork for development of) Action estimates/priorities Plans/investment to mitigate Environmental ) coalfield environmental and social Management Plan Identify subsidence, ) impacts reclamation and resettlement Completed ) measures in fire control areas  10 Table 7A: Project Costs MOP ESTIMATE ACTUAL COST Local I Foreign I Total Local I Foreign ] Total US$ Million US$ Million Consulting Services 0.10 4.50 4.60 1.64 4.89 6.53 Surveying Services 4.10 1.60 5.70 2.81 0.02 2.83 Equipment 0.40 1.10 1.50 0.62 0.23 0.85 Other Support Services 0.50 - 0.50 0.78 - 0.78 Base Cost 5.10 7.20 12.30 5.85 5.14 10.99 Physical Contingencies 0.50 0.70 1.20 - - - Price Contingencies 0.50 0.30 0.80 - - - Total Project Cost 6.10 8.20 14.30 5.85 5.14 10.99 Table 7B: Project Financing APPRAISAL ESTIMATE ACTUAL COST Local Foreign Total Local Foreign US$ Million US$ Million GOI 2.30 - 2.30 2.33 | 2.33 IDA 3.80 8.20 12.00 3.52 5.14 8.66 Total Financing 6.10 8.20 14.30 5.85 5.14 10.99 Total project cost at Table 7A (and therefore, total financing at table 7B) is derived from Borrower records. The actual IDA disbursement totals US$ 8.2 million equivalent (Table 4); the difference is due to different exchange rates being used by IDA and the Borrower.  Table 8: Status of Legal Covenants Agreement Section Covenant Type Present Status Original Revised Description of covenant Comments Fulfillment Fulfillment Date date Development 3.03 9 CD 6/15/93 - Borrower to appoint advisory panel Credit Agreement Project 2.05(a) 9 C - - BCCL to exchange views with IDA Agreement 3.01 5 C - BCCL to carry out operations/affairs in accordance with sound practices 3.03 5 C - - BCCL to take out/maintain insurance 3.04 5 CD (i) 4/15/93 - BCCL to (i) establish fire fighting cell (ii) 9/1/93 - and (ii) appoint a panel of experts 4.01 2 C - - BCCL to maintain financial records and accounts Covenant types: Present Status: 1 = Accounts/audits 9 = Monitoring, review, and reporting C = covenant complied with 2 = Financial 10 = Project implementation not covered CD = complied with after delay 3 = Flow and utilization of project funds by categories 1-9 CP = complied with partially 4 = Counterpart funding 11 = Sectoral or cross-sectoral budgetary NC = not complied with 5 = Management aspects of the project or other resources allocation or executing agency 12 = Sectoral or cross-sectoral policy/ 6 = Environmental covenants regulatory/institutional action 7 = Involuntary resettlement 13 = Other 8 = Indigenous people  12 Table 9: Bank Resources: Staff Inputs (Weeks) Stage of Project Staff Weeks Cycle Through Appraisal 34.5 Appraisal - Board 29.2 Board - 7.2 Effectiveness Supervision 41.0 Completion 8.6 Table 10: Bank Resources: Missions [Perforrnance Rating Number Specialized Imple- Devel- Types of Month/ of Days Staff Skills mentation opment Problems Stage of Project Cycle Year Persons in Represented 3/ Status Objectives 2/ Field Through appraisal 1/92 7 7 E (2), OA, M (2), C (2) - 6/92 6 8 E, OA, C (2), RS - Appraisal through Board 12/92 1 14 M _ _ Approval _ Board Approval through 4/93 2 3 OA, M -Pr, LE Effectiveness Supervision 2/94 2 3 OA, M 2 l Pr 6/94 2 5 E, M S S 1/95 1 4 OA S S Pr 6/95 2 4 OA, M S S Pr, PM 6/96 2 4 E, M S S PM 9/96 2 2 E, M S S PM Completion Report 1/98 1 8 M - 1/ E - Economist, OA - Operations Assistant, M - Mining Engineer, C - Consultant, RS - Resident Staff 2/ Pr - Procurement, LE - Loan Effectiveness, PM - Project Management  13 ANNEX 1 Page 1 of 2 BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (Cr. 2450-IN) IDA IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION (ICR) MISSION JANUARY 1998 AIDE-MEMOIRE 1. An IDA mission (Chris Wardell, Principal Mining Engineer/Task Manager) visited India from January 14-22, 1998 to undertake the Implementation Completion Report (ICR). 2. All aspects of project implementation and related issues were discussed frankly and openly with Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL - the project implementing agency), Coal India Limited (BCCL holding company), and the government (the Borrower) - Ministry of Coal (MOC) and Department of Economic Affairs (DEA). 3. BCCL provided a draft of its contribution to the ICR including comments on the project implementation record, its performance as implementing agency and on the performance of IDA and project consultants. The mission provided advice and support to BCCL on the contributions provided. These inputs were essentially in the form of suggested clarifications and focus, and on the need for BCCL to expand its draft ICR to outline details of work initiated since project completion. There was no major divergence of view between BCCL and the mission regarding the project implementation record and related issues, experience, and appropriate next steps. 4. The main objectives of the project have been completed satisfactorily. Project consultants have assisted BCCL to clearly define the nature and extent of mine fires in the Jharia coalfield and costs of their extinguishment/containment. Related environmental and social mitigation measures and costs have been clearly identified. Fire treatment areas and related environmental/social mitigation measures have been defined into critical, sub-critical and other, less important, components. Critical areas are defined as those that could cause damage to surface infrastructure Gores, rail lines etc.) and to inhabitants, and/or areas where there is an imminent risk of fires jeopardizing BCCL mining operations. 5. Agreement was reached that project implementation delays related primarily to (i) delays in credit signing and effectiveness, (ii) development of a somewhat impractical project implementation schedule, (ii) lack of BCCL familiarization with IDA procurement guidelines and procedures for the provision of consultant services and local  14 ANNEX I Page 2 of 2 field (drill) investigation services, (iii) inadequate assessment of the scheduling of drill investigations during monsoon periods, and (iv) the need for additional drilling beyond that originally anticipated in order to accurately define the extent of mine fires. 6. BCCL are already implementing small-scale fire control programs and, under an MOC-sponsored Emergency Fund, are developing a demonstration resettlement scheme incorporating rehabilitation of some 4,600 people in a new township. In order to better prepare for government review of overall mine fire control and environmental/social mitigation measures, BCCL are preparing terms-of-reference (TOR) for the preparation of detailed Action Plans to prioritize and implement a major fire control program and environmental/social mitigation scheme, supported by economic cost/benefit analyses, where appropriate. This work will be lead by BCCL, supported by CMPDI[, and assisted by international experts as required for guidance and analytical work. The mission is encouraged by this BCCL initiative and has agreed to review and provide comments on these TOR. 7. The mission was informed that the report of the MOC Higher Leve] Committee to identify issues relating to subsidence, fire control and resettlement in the Raniganj (ECL) and Jharia (BCCL) coalfields (and which incorporated consideration of the project consultant reports and project workshops held) has been submitted to the Prime Minister's office for review. Key considerations of the Committee included, inter alia, (i) government mechanisms to develop institutional arrangements to review coalfield fire, subsidence and resettlement issues; (ii) mechanisms to provide funding to address the issues; and (iii) mechanisms to identify suitable projects for implementation. The mission concurred with DEA/MOC that (i) the ICR should strongly underscore the need for detailed Action Plans to be developed to facilitate implementation of Jharia mine fire control (and related environmental and social issues), and (ii) necessary local and international technical assistance required to assist BCCL in this area should be mobilized without delay. 8. The mission confirmed that IDA's draft ICR will be submitted for review by the Borrower and BCCL, within one month of the mission's return to Washington, in order to facilitate IDA processing of the ICR within the present IDA fiscal year.  15 ANNEX 2 Page 1 of 12 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION REPORT INDIA JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 2450-IN) BORROWER'S CONTRIBUTION 3 Introduction: This is an Implementation Completion Report (ICR) for the Jharia Mine Fire Control Technical Assistance project in India. The International Development Association (IDA) sanctioned a Credit of US$12.0 million to the Government of India to be passed on as loan to Bharat Coking Coal Limited for Jharia Mine Fire Control Technical Assistance project, comprising of two parts, namely: A. Development of fire fighting program to bring Jharia coalfield fires under control. B. Preparation of an Environment Management Plan of Jharia coalfield. The value of the project was US$14.30 million with the following break up: IDA Credit US$12.00 million Contribution of Government of India US$ 2.30 million Total US$ 14.30 million The Development Credit Agreement and the Project Agreement were signed on 20th April, 1993, in Washington, USA. Subsidiary Loan Agreement was signed between Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) and the Government of India in July, 1993, in New Delhi. The Credit became effective from September 1993. The Government of India approved the Jharia Mine Fire Technical Assistance Project on 27th June, 1994. Two consultants were engaged by BCCL, one each for fire control and preparation of EMP of Jharia Coalfield. The final contract between BCCL and the two consultants were signed on 27th and 28th June, 1994. Letter of credit was opened with State Bank of India, 3 This section is the Borrower's Contribution. A copy of the original letter facsimile transmission dated March 6, 1998 is in the project file.  16 ANNEX 2 Page 2 of 12 Dhanbad in favor of both the Consultants on 18th July, 1994. Fire fighting and environment Cells were constituted in April 1993. A Panel of Experts comprising of Mr. Robert C. Oberman (USA) and Mr. H. B. Ghosh (India) was appointed as reqliired under Project Agreement. In accordance with the requirements of Development Credit Agreement, an advisory panel comprising of eleven members (representing CIL, BCCL, State Government, District Authorities and NGO) was constituted. The project was completed on September 30, 1997. However, disbursement from the credit was made till February 24, 1998 in respect of the eligible expenditure on the project incurred before the closing date of September 30, 1997. Project Objectives The main objective of this project was to carry out a diagnostic study of the fires of the Jharia coalfield, its remedial measures for fire control and preparation of Environmental Management Plan of Jharia Coalfield. A. Fire Fighting Program The consultants were required to carry out studies and submit report in three parts, namely Priority I, Priority II, Priority III fires, each relating to the part of the Coalfield starting from western end and terminating in south-east end. Final Report combining of all the three reports was to be submitted at the end of the study. The study was required to include the following subject matter: a) Inventory, boundaries and critical parameters of fires. b) Possible spread and estimated rate of spread of fires vertically and horizontally. c) Potential danger to surface structures arising from spread and rate of spread of fires. d) Evaluation of cost benefits for the most suitable method for remediation of fires. e) Identification of Potential Mining Blocks which could be economically exploited. f) Recommendations and conclusions. B. Environment Management Plan The consultants were required to: * Carry out baseline survey covering the Jharia coalfield (JCF) and an area extending about 25 kms, from the boundary of JCF. * Assess the magnitude of the environmental and social impact of coal mining and the fire, as a result of past activities and the expected expansion of mining activities as well as the fire. * Systematically evaluate alternative options for mitigating these impacts, in particular the need for large scale resettlement of the people.  17 ANNEX 2 Page 3 of 12 Involve representative of the local population in the evaluation processTrain client's personnel of the Environmental Cell in the analysis of environmental and social issues related to coal mining and choice of mitigate measures. Prepare Environmental Impact Assessment reports for priority I, II, & III fires. Based on these analysis, prepare Environmental Management Plan of Jharia Coalfield. Implementation and Results A. Fire fighting program A very detailed study of the fires of the Jharia Coalfield was carried out by the Fire Consultants. The equipment specifications, drilling requirement, drill hole specifications were prepared by the consultants for fire fighting program. Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment along with computer hardware and software and temperature monitoring equipment were procured for the study. GPS survey was done for site reconnaissance, precise delineation of fire areas, location of boreholes and other topographical features. 641 numbers of boreholes were drilled and temperature inside the boreholes were measured for determining the status of fires below ground and for delineation of fire perimeters. Remote sensing data, following the Thermal infrared Survey (TIR) carried out by the scanner aboard the aircraft flying at low height, was supplied by National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA), Hyderabad. The draft reports were reviewed by BCCL, Coal India (CIL), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute (CMPDIL), the Advisory Panel and the Panel of the Experts and their comments were sent to the consultants to be incorporated in the final fire reports. The Panel of Experts discussed the findings of the study with the consultants. Necessary corrections/modifications were incorporated in the reports by the consultants after discussion with the Panel of Experts. The consultants identified the alternative options for fighting each individual fire with approximate cost for each option. They also identified certain potential Mining blocks which could be mined economically such as Kusunda, Block VII, Tisra & Block III-IV and carried out cost benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis was confined to the four potential O/C. mining block only. The economic analysis was done considering that the fires would be dealt with in these blocks Quantum of coal saved, as a result of fire measures was also worked out.  18 ANNEX 2 Page 4 of 12 B. Environmental Management Plan (EMP) The activities related to preparation of EMP were baseline surveys for land use, soil, surface features and topography, socio-economic study, air and water quality monitoring, dust and traffic study, vegetation study, general environment and soil study etc.. Traffic study was off loaded to Central Fuel Research Institute (CFRI), Dhanbad. Part of socio-economic studies relating to rapid rural assessment, household survey and host site selection and inventorisation were done by M/S Operation Research Group, Calcutta and vegetation study was done by RS. More College. Land use maps, soil map, base map consisting of surface features and topography, aerial photographs, photo mosaic and digital satellite date were obtained from national Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA), Hyderabad. Air monitoring and inventorisation was done for all the four seasons at 30 sampling stations. Water quality study was carried out at 150 sampling stations. Soil quality monitoring was completed for necessary parameters in various parts of the coalfield. The study was carried out by the Environment consultants in areas of Socio- economics, air/water quality, meteorology, soil, reclamation, hydrology end vegetation. Environmental Impact Assessment of the mitigation measures relating to fire control measures contained in the fire reports submitted by the Fire Consultants were prepared by the Environment Consultants. The draft EMP report consisting of reclamation, socio- economics and air quality were prepared. The reports were scrutinized by BCCL, CMPDIL, and the Advisory Panel and the comments were incorporated in the final EMP. Preliminary cost benefit analysis was carried out for R & R (Resettlement and Rehabilitation), and for reclamation. Project Cost: The expenditure on implementation of the Jharia Mine Fire Control Technlical Assistance Project was as under: Description Particulars World Bank Amount spent Allocation Credit utilized (Mill. US$) (Mill. US$) IDA Credit Consultancy 4.465 * 5.0907 Equipment 1.116 0.7185 Survey & Support Services 4.465 2.822 Unallocated 1.954 0.00.. Total 12.00 8.6612 * Amount as per original contract with consultant was US$4.7564 million. additional sanction of US$0.6543 was obtained from World Bank for payment to the Consultants.  19 ANNEX 2 Page 5 of 12 Thus total sanction from World Bank towards consultancy amounted to US$5.4107 million against which the actual expenditure was US$5.0907 million. The expenditure on the project borne by BCCL (Indian component) was as under: Particulars Sanctioned Cost Expenditure incurred (Mill. US$) till date (Mill. US$) Income tax and R&D 1.83 1.45 Custom duty Freight 0.47 0.10 Sub-total 2.30 1.55 Other Contingency, obligation to the consultants and capital expenses 1.33 0.78 Total 3.63 2.33 Project Schedule As per the original schedule the study was to be completed by December 1994. Delays were incurred in the selection of the Consultants on account of certain objections raised by some of the prospective consultants on various issues such as receipt of bid documents and selection procedure etc. adopted by BCCL. Acceptance of certain mandatory contract provisions was also delayed by one of the Consultant. Administrative delays occurred also in the World Bank in conveying decision to these controversial issues. Further element of delays were introduced in finalisation of specifications by the consultants, procurement of equipment, drilling of additional length of borehole. the project schedule was therefore, revised initially up to June 1996 then December 1996 and finally up to September 1997 in view of the Workshop which took place in Pittsburgh, USA in April 1997. The fire study was completed in June 1996 and the EMP study was completed in September 1996. The final Fire and EMP reports were submitted in December 1996 and March 1997 respectively. The project was completed in September 1997. Bank Performance: The Bank rendered highly professional and competent advice and assistance from time to time in the implementation of the project. The Bank missions visited CIL many times, they visited four times to BCCL, Dhanbad during implementation of the project to monitor the progress of implementation. During each visit, detailed discussions were held by the World Bank officials with the Consultants, the counterpart staff, the BCCL  20 ANNEX 2 Page 6 of 12 and CIL authorities. Their suggestions and guidance during such deliberations greatly helped the Project to achieve the objective. Borrower Performance: The Borrower (BCCL) participated actively and provided all necessary assistance to the Consultants for successful completion of the project. The company fulfilled all the commitments and obligations towards the Consultants and all the concerned agencies including the World Bank. Necessary and continued assistance and suppoi't was also provided by Coal India Limited. Following the completion of the project. BCCL has continued to work closely with Central and State Government officials to develop implementation projects for Fire and Subsidence control and resettlement of people affected due to fires and subsidence. For expediting the implementation of this project BCCL has established a separate full fledged Department headed under General Manager (Coalfield Reconstruction) in addition to the existing Environment Department headed by General Manager (Environment). Consultants Performance: The Fire Consultants made a very detailed study of the Jharia Coalfield for the diagnostic study of the fires. The study was quite comprehensive and covered all the fire parameters giving various possible options for controlling each fire individually. The merits and demerits of each of the options and the cost involved for each option was evaluated. Potential threat of fires to important surface infrastructures such as roads, railway lines, jores, villages/townships etc. was also studied and suitable abatement measures were suggested by the Consultants. Feasibility of open cast mining projects along with fire dealing was also studied by the Consultants. Cost benefit analysis confined to four potential open cast blocks only, with complete economics and IRR analysis. The Environmental Management Plan prepared by the Environment Consultants encompasses the detailed environmental study of air quality, water quality, soil quality, land use study, socio-economic study, vegetation study etc. The study was based on the historical data, field investigations, data generation (for about a year), soil and vegetation data collection etc.. Base line survey of JCF and its buffer area, extending about 15 Km from the boundary of JCF was under study for various environmental parameters. Environmental Impact Assessment reports were prepared based on past and present data and based on these  21 ANNEX 2 Page 7 of 12 analysis the Environmental Management Plan of Jharia Coalfield was prepared. The important aspects of environmental study were comprehensive air quality modeling (FDM), detailed socio-economic impact assessment including field surveys, use of GPS, Remote Sensing Data, Geographical Information System (GIS) for land use survey and preparation of plans etc.. The socio-economic consultants made a series of field visits and interacted with local population, trade union leaders, local management to have an in- depth discussion with the local population and to understand their views in respect of R&R policy of CIL and rehabilitation needs. Summary of Important Findings and Recommendations of the Project Fire Study: i) Over all fires have reduced in area from 17 sq.km (1984) to 8.9 sq.km (1995). ii) Dhanbad-Patherdih rail line (2.8km) is endangered by fires and requires grout stabilization; relocation preferred. iii) Adra-Gomoh rail line requires protection by isolation trench and water curtain. iv) Ekra, Kari and Chatkari Jore are endangered due to fires and requires immediate grout stabilization. v) Jharia and Kirkend towns and other built up areas are endangered due to fires and require immediate isolation from fires; shifting of townships have been recommended as a better option. vi) Total extinguishment of fires immediately is not achievable but further advance of fires can be controlled by application of the recommended fire control measures. vii) The technologies recommended for fire control are: Surface sealing/blanketing by incombustible material Digging out or excavate the hot burning material Quenching using water cannons Isolation of fire by trenching Construction of water curtain Isolation of fire by construction of sand/cement grout cut-off barrier Backfilling high walls, shafts etc. Stabilization by grouting * Construct tunnel plugs viii) More improved use of existing technology has been recommended to help abate fires in general. ix) Some fires may be excavated as part of a profitable open cast mining projects such as Block-IlI, Block-IV, Kusunda, Block-VII and Tisra.  22 ANNEX2 Page 8 of 12 Environment Study Socio-economic i) Unauthorized encroachment on BCCL property is rampant. ii) On account of financial constraints, lack of coordinated assistance from other agencies, BCCL is not able to resettle more than 100 families per year on an average. iii) 22,300 families are required to be shifted on account of fires and mining activities within the active mining areas. Air Quality i) The coalfield contributes 15% of the total pollution load in Damoder River. ii) Construction of small reservoirs to the north of coalfields across the streams are recommended. Workshop Document and Action Plan Based on the recommendations of the study by the consultants and a series of presentations, seminars and deliberations of the workshops, the workshop documents was finalized in May 1997 where in the number of projects totaling about 200 where identified in respect of Fire Control, Subsidence Control measures, Rehabilitation and Environmental Management Planning. All these identified Schemes/Projects of the Action Plan for implementation have been documented in the "Workshop Final Report". SL. PARTICULARS ESTIMATED COSTS NO. (RS. CRORES) A. PROJECT COSTS FOR FIRE CONTROL /MITIGATION 1597.80 MEASURES IN CRITICAL AREAS INCLUDING REHABILITATION OF ENDANGERED SETTLEMENT B. PROJECT COSTS FOR SUBSIDENCE 367.00 MANAGEMENT/MITIGATION IN CRITICAL AREAS INCLUDING REHABILITATION OF ENDANGERED SETTLEMENT C. COSTS FOR MITIGATION ACTIVITIES FOR 1331.00 SUBSIDENCE CONTROL IN SUB-CRITICAL AREAS INCLUDING REHABILITATION D. PROJECT COSTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 770.00 MANAGEMENT INCIDENTAL COST FOR SHIFTING OF ILLEGAL 5.00 SETTLERS GRAND TOTAL 4071.00 E. PROJECT FOR NEW MINING BLOCKS 1998.00 Block III Blocks VII Kusunda Blocks Tisra Blocks  23 ANNEX 2 Page 9 of 12 Action Taken and Future Program More than 200 projects have been identified for fire and subsidence control, environmental mitigation and rehabilitation as already mentioned above. 8 Project reports for an investment of Rs. 1618 Crores have been formulated by CMPDIL for dealing of fire and subsidence control. The formulated schemes are: i) Dealing with fire and subsidence at Industry ii) Dealing with fire and subsidence at Rajapur iii) Dealing with fire and subsidence at Alkusa iv) Dealing with fire and subsidence at Lodna v) Stabilization below Jharia Water Board Tank for subsidence control at East Bhuggatdih vi) Stabilization below Kusunda Yard for subsidence control at Khas Kusunda vii) Stabilization below Chatkari Jore for subsidence control at Joyrampur viii) Stabilization below Kari Jore for subsidence control at Kusunda/Industry Funds are being Sanctioned by the Government for Implementation of above Projects A High Level Committee under the Chairmanship of Sri N.P.Baghchee, Secretary, Ministry of Coal was appointed by the Government in December, 1996 to look into the problems of Fire and Subsidence in Jharia and Ranigani Coalfields. The final report of the Committee has been recently received. Over 22,000 houses are situated in critically endangered areas of BCCL which require immediate shifting. A program for shifting of people from most endangered areas of BCCL has been prepared for immediate shifting of 4600 houses (1500 BCCL+3 100 non-BCCL) for an investment of Rs. 33.88 Crores. Advance action for implementation of this program has already begun. The proposal is under approval of the Government. Action Plan The implementation of about 200 projects as mentioned elsewhere is likely to span over a period 10 to 20 years. A detailed exercise is now needed to be carried out to identify a time bound activity program for implementation of the schemes with their cost-benefit analyses. BCCL now intends to prepare Action Plans for implementation of Fire Control and Environmental/Social mitigation measures and the economic costs/benefits of such measures. It is expected that services of some international consultants/economist may be required for a short period to finalize the Action Plans. Terms of reference for local/international experts are therefore being developed for this purpose.  BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED JHARIA MINE FIRE CONTROL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT STATUS OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE AND CREDIT UTILIZATION AS ON FEBRUARY 28,1998 Category World As per original contract Amount spent/credit utilized Total Bank with consultant Allocation Particulars Mill US$ IDA Credit Portion BCCL/GOI Portion (Mill US$) Foreign Local Total Foreign Local Total (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) Consultancy GAL/Met-Chem 2.4556 2.7012 0.0388 2.7400 - 0.8044 0.8044 Jt Venture Norwest Mine 2.2448 1.9366 0.1628 2.0994 - 0.5741 0.5741 Services Panel of Experts 0.0550 0.0550 0.0003 0.0553 - 0.0139 0.0139 Workshop on - 0.1963 0.0018 0.1981 - 0.0487 0.0487 the Project 4.4050 4.7584 4.8891 0.2037 5.0928 - 1.4411 1.4411 6.5339 Equipment Computer W/s - 0.1497 0.1497 - - - for fire Computer w/s - 0.1270 0.1270 - - - for EMP Global 0.1267 0.0035 0.1302 - 0.0445 0.0445 Positioning System MinePlan 0.0498 - 0.0498 - 0.0476 0.0476 S/Lynx Plus .~~~~~~~~ I 4 ozw  Category World As per original contract Amount spent/credit utilized Total Bank with consultant Allocation Particulars Mill US$ IDA Credit Portion BCCL/GOI Portion (Mill US$) Foreign Local Total Foreign Local Total (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) Temp. 0.0053 - 0.0053 - - - Monitoring & the Mocouple Laboratory 0.0443 - 0.0443 - 0.0117 0.0117 Equipment (Imported) Other 0.2422 0.2422 - - - Equipment 1.1160 0.2261 0.5224 0.7485 - 0.1038 0.1038 0.8523 Survey & NRSA Remote - 0.6937 06937 - Support Sensing Services Drilling in JCF - 2.1048 2.1048 Training to 0.0235 - 0.0235 0.0089 0.0089 Consultants on GPS Survey by ADR Associates, USA 4.485 0.0235 2.7985 2.8220 0.0089 0.009 2.8309 Unallocated 1.984 . Total 12.00 5.1387 3.5246 8.6633 1.5538 1.5538 10.2171 tD o Ct  Category World As per original contract Amount spent/credit utilized Total Bank with consultant Allocation Particulars Mill US$ IDA Credit Portion BCCL/GOI Portion (Mill US$) Foreign Local Total Foreign Local Total (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill US$) (Mill __________ _________ ~~ ~~US$)_ _ _ _ _ _ Other contingencies 0.7800 0.7800 0.7800 contractual obligation to the consultants and Bank charges which are common expenses not proportionable correctly Grand Total 12.00 5.1387 3.5246 8.6633 2.3338 2.3338 10.9971 Remarks: 1. The expenditure shown under "Local" column under BCCL/GOI portion against "Consultancy" category and Survey and Support Services' category represents Income Tax and R & D less payment. 2. The expenditure shown under Local column under the BCCL/GOI portion against "equipment" category represents custom duty. 3. Figures are provisional and subject to change during audit or reconciliation with CIL Ministry. F'd (D o M Fh .