Группа Всемирного банка · Implementation Completion and Results Report

Indonesia - Community Recovery Project through the Urban Poverty Program in Earthquakes - Tsunami Affected Areas of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam and North Sumatra

Индонезия Всемирный банк
Открыть оригинал документа

Полный текст размещён на сайте публикующей организации. lawenc.com индексирует метаданные и ведёт на официальный источник.

Полный текст

 Document of The World Bank Report No: ICR00001537 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (TF-55626) ON A MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUND FOR ACEH AND NORTH SUMATRA GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 17.96 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA FOR A COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROJECT THROUGH THE URBAN POVERTY PROGRAM IN EARTHQUAKE-TSUNAMI AFFECTED AREAS OF NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM AND NORTH SUMATRA January 27, 2011 Indonesia Sustainable Development Unit Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective December 23, 2010) Currency Unit = Rupiah US$1 = IDR 9,085 IDR 1,000 = US$0.11 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BKM Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat (Board of Community Trustees) BRR Badan Rekonstruksi dan Rehabilitasi (Board for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation) CAS Country Assistance Strategy CDD community-driven development CPS Country Partnership Strategy CRRP Community Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Plan CSRRP Community-Based Settlement Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project CTC Community Trustee Committee for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (also known by its Indonesia acronym, KERAP) GoI Government of Indonesia ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report IDR Indonesian Rupiah ISR Implementation Status Report KDP Kecamatan Development Project KERAP Komite Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Kelurahan (Indonesian name for CTC) KSM Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat (self-help community group) MDF Multi-Donor Fund for Aceh and Nias M&E monitoring and evaluation MoF Ministry of Finance MPW Ministry of Public Works NMC National Management Consultant OC oversight consultant O&M operations and maintenance PAD Project Appraisal Document PDO project development objective PIU Project Implementation Unit PNPM Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (National Community Empowerment Program) PMU Project Management Unit Sec-MDF Secretariat of the Multi-Donor Fund for Aceh and Nias TA technical assistance UPP Urban Poverty Project Vice President: Mr. James W. Adams Country Director: Mr. Stefan G. Koeberle Sector Manager: Mr. Franz R. Drees-Gross Project Team Leader: Mr. George Soraya ICR Team Leader: Mr. George Soraya INDONESIA COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROJECT THROUGH THE URBAN POVERTY PROGRAM IN EARTHQUAKE-TSUNAMI AFFECTED AREAS CONTENTS Data Sheet A. Basic Information B. Key Dates C. Ratings Summary D. Sector and Theme Codes E. Bank Staff F. Results Framework Analysis G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs H. Restructuring I. Disbursement Graph 1. Project Context, Development Objectives and Design ............................................... 1 2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes .............................................. 4 3. Assessment of Outcomes ............................................................................................ 9 4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome......................................................... 12 5. Assessment of Bank and Grantee Performance ........................................................ 12 6. Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................... 14 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Grantee/Implementing Agencies/Donors .............. 15 Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing .......................................................................... 17 Annex 2. Outputs by Component ................................................................................. 18 Annex 3. Economic and Financial Analysis ................................................................. 22 Annex 4. Grant Preparation and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes ....... 23 Annex 5. Summary of Grantee’s ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR ....................... 25 Annex 6. MDF Secretariat’s Comments on Draft ICR ................................................. 27 Annex 7. List of Supporting Documents ...................................................................... 27 Annex 8. Achievement of Project Development Objectives ........................................ 29 MAP A. Basic Information Community Recovery Country: Indonesia Project Name: in Earthquake Affected Areas through UPP Project ID: P096647 L/C/TF Number(s): TF-55626 ICR Date: 02/13/2011 ICR Type: Core ICR GOVERNMENT OF Lending Instrument: ERL Grantee: INDONESIA Original Total USD 18.0M Disbursed Amount: USD 17.5M Commitment: Revised Amount: USD 17.5M Environmental Category: B Implementing Agencies: Ministry of Public Works Cofinanciers and Other External Partners: B. Key Dates Revised / Actual Process Date Process Original Date Date(s) Concept Review: 05/10/2005 Effectiveness: 10/30/2005 11/21/2005 Appraisal: 08/02/2005 Restructuring(s): Approval: 08/24/2005 Mid-term Review: 12/15/2006 02/15/2007 Closing: 12/31/2009 12/31/2009 C. Ratings Summary C.1 Performance Rating by ICR Outcomes: Satisfactory Risk to Development Outcome: Moderate Bank Performance: Satisfactory Grantee Performance: Satisfactory C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance (by ICR) Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings Quality at Entry: Satisfactory Government: Satisfactory Implementing Quality of Supervision: Satisfactory Satisfactory Agency/Agencies: Overall Bank Overall Borrower Satisfactory Satisfactory Performance: Performance: i C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators Implementation QAG Assessments Indicators Rating Performance (if any) Potential Problem Project Quality at Entry No None at any time (Yes/No): (QEA): Problem Project at any Quality of No None time (Yes/No): Supervision (QSA): DO rating before Satisfactory Closing/Inactive status: D. Sector and Theme Codes Original Actual Sector Code (as % of total Bank financing) General water, sanitation and flood protection sector 50 65 Sub-national government administration 50 35 Theme Code (as % of total Bank financing) Natural disaster management 33 45 Urban services and housing for the poor 67 55 E. Bank Staff Positions At ICR At Approval Vice President: James W. Adams Jemal-ud-din Kassum Country Director: Stefan G. Koeberle Andrew D. Steer Sector Manager: Franz R. Drees-Gross Keshav Varma Project Team Leader: George Soraya George Soraya ICR Team Leader: George Soraya ICR Primary Author: Andre Oosterman F. Results Framework Analysis Project Development Objectives (from Project Appraisal Document) To provide support for reconstruction and rehabilitation to urban communities impacted by the earthquake and tsunami. Revised Project Development Objectives (as approved by original approving authority) ii (a) PDO Indicator(s) Original Target Formally Actual Value Values (from Revised Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value approval Target Completion or documents) Values Target Years % Disaster victim households in the targeted kelurahan receive benefits and Indicator 1 : improved services from the projects Value quantitative or 0 75% 95% Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 Comments (incl. % achievement) % Community Trustee Committees (CTCs) formed under the project are Indicator 2 : representative, effective and operate in a participatory manner Value quantitative or 0 more than 70% 90% Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 The value achieved at completion is a conservative estimate, based on data about Comments success in CRRP implementation, voting rates in CTC elections, women's (incl. % participation, complaint handling performance, cost of investments, and other achievement) indicators. % CTCs are able to channel other donor reconstruction funds to their Indicator 3 : communities Value quantitative or 0 50% 100 Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 In all 402 kelurahan, the CTCs channeled funds from GoI's ongoing CDD Comments program (UPP3 and PNPM) co-financed by the Bank; 49 kelurahan also (incl. % obtained funds through the MDF-financed Community-Based Settlement achievement) Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project. (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Original Target Actual Value Formally Values (from Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value Revised approval Completion or Target Values documents) Target Years Indicator 1 : % Community rehabilitation and reconstruction plans are implemented Value (quantitative 0 90% 99.3% or Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 Comments Almost all of the specific investments identified in the Community Rehabilitation iii (incl. % and Reconstruction Plans were fully financed through the project's block grants. achievement) Only two of the eligible 273 kelurahan did not implement the full grant amounts planned. Indicator 2 : % of kelurahan adults vote in CTC leadership elections Value (quantitative 0 30% 30.2% or Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 In 2005 and 2006 the voting rate was only 19% because of difficulties in Comments registering voters, as many residents had been killed and refugees were returning (incl. % to the area. From 2007, registration was more complete, and attention to CTC achievement) elections increased. % Kelurahan households utilize reconstructed/rehabilitated community Indicator 3 : infrastructure Value (quantitative 0 50% 100% or Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 The extremely high utilization rate is explained by the fact that the Project Comments mainly financed key infrastructure for common use (such as roads) in (incl. % neighborhoods where most basic infrastructure had been destroyed by the achievement) tsunami and earthquake. % Poorest household disaster victims receive social service assistance grants Indicator 4 : from CTCs. Value (quantitative 0 Poorest 10% 48% or Qualitative) Date achieved 08/25/2005 08/25/2005 12/31/2009 Comments In retrospect, targeting the 10% "poorest" households was not deemed (incl. % appropriate because many residents in the targeted kelurahan had lost so much achievement) that distinguishing the poorest 10% was not meaningful. G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs Actual Date ISR No. DO IP Disbursements Archived (USD millions) 1 03/26/2007 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 17.90 2 11/06/2007 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 17.90 3 03/11/2009 Satisfactory Satisfactory 17.90 H. Restructuring (if any) Not Applicable iv I. Disbursement Profile v 1. Project Context, Development Objectives and Design 1.1 Context at Appraisal In December 2004, the province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (better known as “Aceh

Основные сведения
Дата принятия
Страна Индонезия
Источник Всемирный банк