India - Second Hydrology Project : procurement plan

 INDEX SI. No. Name of the Agency Page Number STATE AGENCIES . .. Summary 1-11 1. Andra Pradesh (GW) 1 to4 2. Andra Pradesh (SW) 5 to 7 3. Chattisgarh (GW) 18to 11 4. Chattisgarh (SW) 12 to 16 5. Goa 17 to 24 1 9. Karnataka (GW) 33 to 36 . 10. Karnataka (SW) 37 to 39 11. Kerala (GW) 40 to 46 12. Kerala (SW) 47 to 49 pp 13. Madhva Pradesh (GW) 50 to 53 14. ~adh;aPradesh ( S W ~ 54 to 57 15. Maharastra (GW) 58 to61 16. Maharastra (SW) . 62 to 65 17. Orissa (GW) 66 to 68 18. Orissa (SW) 69 to 72 19. Pondicherry 1 73 to 79 20. Punjab 80 to 84 I 21. Tamilnadu (GW) 85 to 90 22. iTamilnadu iswi 191 to96 1 CENTRAL AGENCIES 1 I 1. BBMB 97 to 99 2. CGWB 100to 103 3. CPCB 104 to 106 4. CWC 107to 109 5. CWPRS 110 to111 6. IMD 112 to 113 8. NIH 114to 116 9. PCS 117 to 120  Summary Sheet: Procurement Plan FY 2008-09 of IAs under World Bank Assisted Hydrology ProjectPhase-ll(Loan No. 4649-IN) (inRs. '000) Implementing Training1 SI NO. Works Goods Consultancy Total Agencies Services 1 Andhra Pradesh(GW) 4.066 13,472 1,066 Nil 18,604 2 Andha Pradesh (SW) 1,530 3,451 Nil Nil 4,981 3 Chhatisgarj(GW) 3.019 10,418 2.465 Nil 15,902 4 Chhatisgarh(SW) 7.923 1.115 1,115 Nil 10.153 5 Goa 10.650 10,160 400 1,814 23,025 6 Gujarat(GW) 1,024 Nil Nil Nil . 1,024 7 Gujarat (SW) 5.905 6.621 Nil Nil 12,526 8 HimachalPradesh 44.432 61,260 2,533 Nil 108,225 9 Karnataka (GW) 4,849 11.442 Nil Nil 16,291 10 Karnataka(GW) 1,000 5,800 Nil Nil 6,800 1 Kerala(GW) 2,419 10,521 200 Nil 13,140 12 Kerala (SW) 2,850 2,564 Nil Nil 5,414 13 Madhya Pradesh(GW) 5,325 12,914 1,054 Nil 19,293 14 Madhya Pradesh (SW) 3,203 10,586 1.737 Nil 15,526 15 Mahaastra (GW) Nil 1,279 183 Nil 1,462 16 Mahaastra (SW) 4,861 4.665 908 Nil 10,434 17 Orissa (GW) 1,038 620 900 Nil 2,558 18 Orissa (SW) 4,953 10,452 2.678 Nil 18,083 19 Pondicherry 14,298 6.755 1,620 Nil 22.673 - 20 Punjab 124063 26057 I l l 0 Nil 151,230 21 Tamil Nadu(GW) 7,648 12,267 5,799 Nil 25,714' 28 (IMD 6,000 1 62,200 1 Nil I Nil 1 68,200 29 NIH 3.100 12,444 100,000 Nil 115.544 30 PCS 12,300 2,418 49,400 Nil 64,118 Total 327,310 394,471 399,769 3,567 1,125,118  HP-I lmplementnigAgencies (Old or Existing IAs) New Implementing Agencies Training1 SI No. ImplementingAgencies Works Goods Consultancy Total Services 1 Goa 10,650 10,160 400 1,814 23.025 2 Himachal Pradesh 44,432 61,260 2,533 Nil 108,225 3 Pondicherry 14,298 6,755 1.620 Nil 22,673 4 Punjab 124063 26057 1110 Nil 151,230 5 BBMB 1,384 5,528 126,840 Nil 133,752 6 CPCB Nil 499 Nil Nil 499 Total 194,827 110,259 132,503 1,814 439,404 Central ImplementingAgencies  ales 01pa~~naula~nl!puadx3 2 - B - 0 3 z 3 z f uol~aldwcx)lo alea d B 7 E 5 N g - N 'ONHEM.. % a m 3 N I ~ I ~ ~ Z ' g hl!leuol,e~jjoweruo3 10aweN $ ON lXJl'J03 m 4 a- - O o u o > w - - 2 0 - m 0 3 N r n a m : 7 9 9 z 2 k E sggzg 8 e - Z 4 0 ? " 3~ -8 2 R m - 0 0 - B m - ?" - -Fpwz;z = 4 m s P z z $ 2 2 2 4 5 + 8 B 8 B S < j j % % e 5 - f f f 2 , 01" U -I I  - - - - v b $ > .m 0 m g - LO - 5 8 n rn m :2 -J C rn B a c a a 'z 3 n g C m 2 :e 4 n 0 g g 2 0 3 0 u % 5 -- 'n 0"7 W - c 3 5 % n 2a "I a $; 9 X a % u w D - a $ $ z e 3 0, (b D S + -i rn 3 n g z ; - ,., ,., ,., - - u '.. - - - - - N - - - n n m W m ProjedComponent rn m 9 *, 3 f 8 9 8 !! 0 8 9 a - 2 8 Melhodof Procuremenl(ICBINCB) - - a m ,., ,., u 8 z Un11cost 2 B m . . 0 , Q ~ Y 1 0 ) - A 2 2 * m A 2 a E I -J Estlrnated Cosl ( ~Rs'OM)) n 0 cD I I I D W $ D W < D W < D W $ > Z $ P W $ ~ - A c ? cL d ? Design1InvestigationCompleled 5 "3 8 8 8 6 $ B (Date) I I I ,., ,., '.. S ~ , ! ~ Q - " $ rn * 2 L - L L f 5 0 , r n c m 3 8 g 8 8 i i c ~ S & w g e 5 m n ,., ,., ,., - -a$ 2 ? ? ? 2 r , - L - - .5?82# C c c c B . B & H B B - 2zs0, . ,., '.. r DD N 0) ; ; zz- c * % c L A % g C h, 8 - z m- z c '.. ^ 3 g 2 g 5 A =2 W 8 f i 8 8 - % 8 m % z-z N ,., * 2 0 A I: D I: n 8 z 8 B ------------------ ,., - ; A A 2 "2 10 2 R z a W 8 - 8 8 h - $2 0 r ,., ,., g? N u g p OP 2 i w + 5 8 S B S k f 8 k 5: : = = Z - 0 x - - m A 2 k B ? 0 ? w s & i k k 6 - Contract No. A m Name ol Conlraclorl Nat~onality8 A (D ZlplPlN Code  - m u E- - s ;a A g A V Ln L 2 L c (Pb C_ ? b -E+ O 0 m m 3 0, S- - W - '? >g$1-$ Z z . r 0 L L z+ - C_ C p b "b -2A 0) m b m o 0 - 8 > 5 h) 'D A ? 7 E E ;- C _ 'L? + 3 N b "b -s? - D A CD 8 -E- - m OL 4 0 D m ; 4 A 0_ A - D f z OL "b E 0 -", 0 W m - m m m 0 i6 ... - 2 A W O 0_ < " g q e m g b 0 k m a - - ! h-K - "- - N 0 LP 1 7 e W Z L g g 3 % rn vi 5 < T G I D S z m b 0 ' 2 ~ 0 m - P g r m 2' fl) H 5 s ; B i 4 rn --- A . s " % P I 5 ; ; 5 m 6 -; (D Z E g I ZLx' D ... I -, Conlracl No Name of Contraclorl A I Nalional~lyB ZtplPlNCode "WBR NO A (D 0 A '2 0 h) F F 0 N Dale of complellon 2 O m m 0 0 0 m N Expend~lure~ncurredlo Dale  'PP Tal~eldate~ayreedarper Sdl-Md.lMTIYAZ P,ocvlemenl Plan R Revwd A Aclua Oaler 'RFP (Requeulor Pmprrall -WBR NO 4oM BI,,~ DIRECTOR Rele~rnceNumbel Note The dates In Column 10 are unlque All other dales are auto generated GroundWater Department A P The acl~v~llesunder HAD,DSS 8 PDS w~llbe actually planned after f~nal~sat~onof consultants and approved al central level  - - I I 5' sso ssa ~ ~ ~ w u d w d ~ W W ~ J U I T