873Bulletin of the World Health Organization | November 2005, 83 (11)
1 University of Copenhagen, Institute of Public Health, Department of International Health, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 16, Entrance I, PO Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark. Correspondence should be sent to Dr Jensen at this address (email: p.k.jensen@pubhealth.ku.dk). 2 National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Division of Enteric Infections, Hanoi, Viet Nam. 3 Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Royal Agriculture and Veterinary University, Frederiksberg, Denmark. Ref. No. 05-025130
Successful sanitation promotion must recognize the use of latrine wastes in agriculture — the example of Viet Nam Peter Kjær Jensen,1 Pham Duc Phuc,2 Anders Dalsgaard,3 & Flemming Konradsen1
Introduction To achieve the aims of the Millennium Development Goals, significant investments will be required to increase sanitation coverage and improve the management of human excreta. The United Nations Millennium Task Force on Water and Sanita- tion put forward 10 crucial actions that would be needed, and among these is a pledge for governments to support sanitation solutions that are technically, socially, environmentally and financially appropriate (1).
In eastern Asia one of the key aspects to be considered when promoting appropriate sanitation solutions and design- ing health education programmes is the use of human excreta as an agricultural fertilizer. The centuries old tradition of using human excreta on farmland has been abandoned in Europe, but is still widespread in east Asia, especially in China and Viet Nam. Although there may be negative health consequences of the use of excreta as fertilizer, it is argued here, in reference to the current situation in Viet Nam, that if this is a com- mon practice among farmers, then sanitation programmes and hygiene campaigns must acknowledge its existence and design systems that allow for excreta to be used in the safest way possible.
Excreta reuse and health From an agricultural point of view the use of human excreta is a sound practice for several reasons. • It provides cheap fertilizer for crops and thus reduces im-
ports of commercial fertilizer. • It is a good soil conditioner. • It is an integral part of nutrient recycling in different types
of integrated farming systems.
However, depending on the standard of hygiene during the handling and composting of the faecal material, the use of excreta can have severe negative health consequences. These may affect farm workers who are directly exposed to the excreta; children playing in or near fields; and consumers of fertilized produce. In addition, pathogens may be transmitted to, and spread by, wild and domestic animals, having wider geographical health and hygiene implications.
More than 75% of the farmers studied in the Nghe An province in central Viet Nam were reported to use fresh or partly composted human excreta to fertilize their farmlands
Perspectives
or gardens (2). This continuous use of excreta in agriculture is likely to contribute to the very high rate of infection with intestinal parasites in Viet Nam. For example, it has been estimated that 22 million Vietnamese, or nearly 29% of the entire population, have hookworm infection. In some farming communities in north and central Viet Nam reported rates of hookworm infection were 70% or more of the entire popula- tion (3, 4). Furthermore, it is likely that the transmission of other important pathogens such as Trichuris spp., Ascaris spp. and Taenia spp. is favoured by the continued use of excreta. Similar problems are encountered in China where it is esti- mated that more than 530 million people are infected with Ascaris spp. (5).
The authorities in Viet Nam have recently revised the regulations on sanitation and hygiene promotion, including the practices for the handling of latrine wastes, with an emphasis on adhering to a minimum duration of composting of excreta be- fore it is used as an agricultural fertilizer. This revision is partly a response to the continued widespread use of human excreta in agriculture. It is clear that excreta management systems will have to be put in place to tackle the significant public health problems associated with unhygienic management of excreta in the region. The question is, what systems will work?
Implementation problems Evaluations from east Asia have shown that sanitation pro- grammes often promote latrines that do not accommodate the practice of farming households collecting and using excreta in agriculture (6, 7). The types of latrine that have been promoted include the pour flush and septic tanks which are superior from a hygienic point of view to the traditional Vietnamese double vault composting latrine. However, it is important to bear in mind that the farmers see excreta as a valuable fertilizer and, therefore, favour latrines where they can store excreta and have access when needed for use in agricultural production (2, 7). There are instances of farmers forcing open the seal of latrines and/or septic tanks and breaking the latrines, to gain access to the excreta. In a sanitation project in Xom Ha province in Viet Nam, 30% of the latrines had been destroyed within two years because the farmers could not gain accesss to the excreta (7). Thus, it is clear that for sanitation and hygiene promotion programmes to be successful, legislation must acknowledge the practice of using excreta as fertilizer.
874 Bulletin of the World Health Organization | November 2005, 83 (11)
Perspectives Latrines and agriculture Peter Kjær Jensen et al.
References 1. Bartram J, Lewis K, Lenton R, Wright A. Focusing on improved water and sanitation for health. Lancet 2005 Feb 26-Mar 4;365(9461):810-12. 2. Phuc DP. Study of people’s perception and handling practices of the use of latrine wastes as fertilizers in agriculture in Phuc Son commune, Nghe An province, Viet Nam [Msc Thesis]. Copenhagen: Institute of Public Health, Department of International Health, University of Copenhagen; 2003 3. van der Hoek W, De NV, Konradsen F, Cam PD, Hoa NT, Toan ND et al. Current status of soil-transmitted helminths in Vietnam. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2003;34Suppl 1:1-11. 4. Verle P, Kongs A, De NV, Thieu NQ, Depraetere K, Kim HT et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in northern Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health 2003 Oct;8(10):961-4. 5. Peng W, Zhou X, Cui X. Comparisons of the structures of natural and re-established populations of Ascaris in humans in a rural community of Jiangxi, China. Parasitology 2002;124(Pt 6):641-7.
6. Government of Vietnam. National Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Strategy Study NRWSS, Midterm report, Social and hygienic situation. Hanoi: Government of Vietnam; 1997;3. 7. Water and Sanitation Programme. Selling sanitation in Vietnam, what works? Jakarta: Water and Sanitation Programme, East Asia and the Pacific; 2002. 8. Ministry of Health. Regarding issuing the sector standards. Hygiene standards for various types of latrines. Hanoi: Ministry of Health; 2005. (Decision of the Minister of Health No. 08/2005/Q§-BYT.) 9. Schönning C, Stenström T. Guidelines for the safe use of urine and faeces in ecological sanitation systems. Stockholm Environmental Institute: Stockholm; 2004. 10. Feachem RG, Bradley DJ, Darelick H, Mara DD. Sanitation and disease – health aspects of excreta and waste water management. New York: John Wiley & Sons for the World Bank; 1983.
Legislation on excreta and its use in agriculture The authorities in Viet Nam do allow the use of composted hygienic safe human excreta as a fertilizer in horticulture. However, until very recently the definition of “hygienic safe human excreta” was based on composting time only, and the two main responsible ministries, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, applied different standards for the minimum required composting time (three and six months, respectively). This lack of com- mon standards hindered the promotion of safe practices. However, following recent revisions to the guidelines both ministries now recommend a composting time of six months for the production of hygienic safe excreta that can be used as fertilizer (8). This duration of composting for human ex- creta to be used as crop fertilizers is likely to protect human health, especially if the farmers continue with the common practice of adding kitchen ash and lime (calcium oxide) to the latrines, a practice that has been found to reduce the composting time needed to obtain hygienic compost (9). Even for Ascaris eggs a die-off of 97% can be expected after 6–8 months of composting without increasing pH (10). However, one problem in ensuring a sufficient composting time relates to the agricultural calendar, as the climatic belt of north and central Viet Nam accommodates three crops per year. Phuc (2) found that farmers applying human excreta paid more attention to the fertilizer needs of the plants than to the potential hygienic problems. Therefore, it is likely that farmers would remove the excreta from the latrines every fourth month during land preparation, regardless of regula- tions on the length of composting.
Future research and implementation needs When considering previous experiences with sanitation in the east Asian region, it seems relevant that the new guidelines and promotional activities address the priorities of farmers and that applied research should focus on combining the sanitation and health objectives with the needs of the farmers for agricultural inputs. Important issues to be addressed in the planning and implementation process are discussed below.
Focus on the farmers’ needs In areas where use of human excreta in agriculture is com- mon, farming households would probably accept sanitation technologies and hygiene promotional activities if they could be accommodated within the agricultural production system and be seen as offering an economic advantage. The focus should be on the development of sanitation systems that allow for the use of excreta as fertilizer rather than only on the need for improvements in hygiene.
Process development One way forward may be to focus on making the composting process more efficient and shortening the composting time. Instead of focusing on a minimum safe composting time, the advantage of adding a sufficient quantity of lime to the excreta to accelerate the composting process so that it takes less than four months would be a better option. Another possibility would be to add carbon-rich material to the latrine waste, such as rice husk or straw materials, which may increase the tem- perature in the pit.
Interdisciplinary decision-making The Vietnamese example shows that legislation should be based on multidisciplinary know-how. In the case of promotion of sanitation and hygiene, a single ministry will not have the specific expertise or awareness required to design sustainable programmes. Therefore, the emphasis should be on forming an interdisciplinary taskforce that would support and accom- modate the different priorities of the health, agriculture and sanitation ministries.
Adaptation of technology Caution is necessary when promoting a particular technology, such as the eco-sanitary latrines, also referred to as composting latrines, because they may not be sustainable and hygienically sound if the technology is not in accordance with the liveli- hoods and priorities of the local communities. The technology needs to be adapted through community involvement and people must see both the economic and health benefits of using the technology. O
Competing interests: none declared.