·
I
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
OnGANISf~TION
t10NDIALE OlE LA SANT~
REGIONAL OFfiCE FO!'.. THE WESTERN PACIFIC BU1I.EAU I\~GIONAl DU PACifiQUE OCCIDENTAL
REGIONAL CO?.fMIT.IEE
WPR/RC24/'ID9 3 september 1973
TWenty-fourth session Wellin8ton 28 August - 5 September 1973
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
EVAIlJATION QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE 'IECHNICAL DISCUSSIONS
Attached 1s a copy of the questionnaire to evaluate tile Technical Discussions. It ls hoped that this will be completed by each Representative •
..
,,
, r·
o
\
.
I.
'0
'"
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE TECHNICAL DISCUSSION This questionnaire has been prepared for the purpose of making an assessment of the procedures and the results obtained from the Technical Discussions held in connexion with the Regional Com~ittee. Information from the replies to this questionnaire will be useful in planning for the Technical Discussions next year. The form is to be left tmsigned and your suggestions, comments and frank criticism, would be appreciated. Kindly indicate your replies with a check under ~~e appropriate boxes below and write your comments in the last column. If the space(s) is/are not adequate, further comments can be written on the back of the page. Please cite the corresponding item nQ~ber. --- - -----
ITEM
EVALUATION Partly IVery relevant Relevant relevant relevant Nut
COMr<:E.NT
11. i
Did you consider the subject of the Technical Discussion of relevance to your country situation?
I ,
I j j
DOD
0
1------1 2.
Did you receive the working papers and guidelines in sufficient time for reading and study before coming to the RCM?
Not :Not More than Suffisufficent c1ent sufficient received
o 0
o Useful
D Partly useful
o Not useful
--r---,
).
Did you feel that the working papers were use- IVery ful in the plenary sessions and group useful discussions?
I --------, j
0 Useful
0 Partly useful
D Not usef".Jl
I
4.
Has the technical discussion guide useful in pin-pcinting the issues and channeling the discussions at the e;roup meetings?
Very useful
10 "
, 5. "tlas your discussion group adequately constituted in terms of number and composition of partici.pants?
o D
D
o D
I il
More than ,Il,deadequate quate
Partly Not adequate adequate
D
0
/
,
"
\..,.-r'
f":\
1(', "
\
"
...,
, \,-_~_.f
ITEM
EVALUATION
COMMENl'
6.
Not at all Did you feel the group discussions permitted a Well Partly balanced exposition of the topics discussed and balanced Balanced balanced balanced exchange of views?
D
0
0
D
7.
Were the following sessions useful in the proper understanding and consideration of the subject: First plenary session .
Very useful
Useful
Partly useful
Not useful
I
---
,. 0
I
0
D 0 D
D 0 .- ..
DiSCUssion group meetings Second plenary session
I
0 0 0
0
-
D 0
D .--.
8.
Considering the limited time available for its preparation, did you feel that your group report adequately reflected the consensus arrived at during your group discussions?
More than Adeadequate quate
Partly Not adequate adequate
D
D 1 i
9.
Did you feel that the final report adequately reflected the views and conclusions derived from the group reports?
!More I I ,
I , ,
than 'Adeiadequate quate
Partly Not adequate adequate
0
0
0
0
I I I
I
,/
, () ~/
h EVALUATION
\
r
'-. ../
ITEM 10. Were you generally satisfied with the organization and conduct of the Technical Discussions?
COMMENl' Not'
i I
Very satisfactory
Satisfactory
Partly satisfactory
satisfactory
l
I
D 0
D Some
0 Little
0 None
I .
I
'
11. Did you feel that you personally derived new knowledge and acquired new insights from your participation at the meeting?
I
! I i
Much
D
0
0