EXECUTIVE BOARD 130th session Provisional agenda item 6.10
EB130/19 Add.1 1 December 2011
Report on financial and administrative implications for the Secretariat of resolutions proposed for adoption by the Executive Board or Health Assembly 1. Resolution: Poliomyelitis: intensification of the global eradication initiative 2. Linkage to the Programme budget 2012–2013 (see document A64/7 http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA64/A64_7-en.pdf) Strategic objective(s): 1 Organization-wide expected result(s): 1.2 How would this resolution contribute to the achievement of the Organization-wide expected result(s)? It would support the interruption of circulation of wild poliovirus, and the minimization and management of long-term poliovirus risks. Does the programme budget already include the products or services requested in this resolution? (Yes/no) Yes 3. Estimated cost and staffing implications in relation to the Programme budget (a) Total cost Indicate (i) the lifespan of the resolution during which the Secretariat’s activities would be required for implementation and (ii) the cost of those activities (estimated to the nearest US$ 10 000) (i) 6 years (covering the period 2013–2018)
(ii) Total: US$ 1896 million (staff: US$ 658 million; activities: US$ 1238 million) (b) Cost for the biennium 2012–2013 Indicate how much of the cost indicated in 3 (a) is for the biennium 2012–2013 (estimated to the nearest US$ 10 000). Total: US $935 million (staff: US$ 281 million; activities: US$ 654 million) Indicate at which levels of the Organization the costs would be incurred, identifying specific regions where relevant. 8% of total costs at headquarters level, 6% at regional level and 86% at country level. Is the estimated cost fully included within the approved Programme budget 2012–2013? (Yes/no) No If “no”, indicate how much is not included. US$ 494 million
EB130/19 Add.1
(c)
Staffing implications Could the resolution be implemented by existing staff? (Yes/no) Yes If “no” indicate how many additional staff – full-time equivalents – would be required, identifying specific regions and noting the necessary skills profile(s), where relevant.
4. Funding Is the estimated cost for the biennium 2012–2013 indicated in 3 (b) fully funded? (Yes/no) No If “no”, indicate the funding gap and how the funds would be mobilized (provide details of expected source(s) of funds). US$ 596 million; source(s) of funds: WHO Member States, multilateral organizations (including the European Commission and development banks), the private sector (including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Rotary International).
=
=
=
2