Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
For section 3 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (in this Part referred to as “the 1973 Act”) (which provides that no petition for divorce shall be presented within three years of marriage unless the leave of the court has been obtained) there shall be substituted the following section—
Section 13 of the 1973 Act (which imposes restrictions on the institution of proceedings for a decree of nullity in respect of a voidable marriage) shall be amended as follows.
For subsection (2) of section 13 there shall be substituted the following subsection—
At the end of section 13 there shall be added the following subsections—
For section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (in this Part referred to as “the 1973 Act”) there shall be substituted the following sections—
In section 27 of the 1973 Act (financial provision in case of neglect to maintain) for subsection (3) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
In section 28(1) of the 1973 Act (duration of continuing financial provision orders in favour of party to a marriage), for the words from the beginning to “the following limits” there shall be substituted the words “Subject in the case of an order made on or after the grant of a decree of divorce or nullity of marriage to the provisions of sections 25A(2) above and 31(7) below, the term to be specified in a periodical payments or secured periodical payments order in favour of a party to a marriage shall be such term as the court thinks fit, except that the term shall not begin before or extend beyond the following limits”.
After subsection (1) of the said section 28 there shall be inserted the following subsection—.
In subsection (3) of the said section 28 (effect of remarriage on financial provision orders), after the word “remarries” there shall be inserted the words “whether at any time before or after the commencement of this Act”.
In section 29(2) of the 1973 Act (duration of continuing financial provision orders in favour of children), in paragraph (a), for the words “unless the court thinks it right in the circumstances of the case to specify a later date” there shall be substituted the words “unless the court considers that in the circumstances of the case the welfare of the child requires that it should extend to a later date”.
Section 31 of the 1973 Act (variation and discharge of orders) shall be amended as follows.
In subsection (1) after the words “subject to the provisions of this section” there shall be inserted the words “and of section 28(1A) above”.
For subsection (7) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
After subsection (9) there shall be inserted the following subsection—
The following section shall be inserted after section 33 of the 1973 Act—
For subsection (1) of section 15 of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (under which the court on the grant of a decree of divorce, nullity or judicial separation has power, if the parties to the marriage agree, to order that one party shall not on the death of the other party be entitled to apply for an order under section 2 of that Act) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
In section 25(1) of that Act (interpretation), in the definition of “the court” after the word “means” there shall be inserted the words “unless the context otherwise requires”.
For section 3 of the Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978 there shall be substituted the following section—
In section 5(2) of that Act (duration of periodical payments orders in favour of children), in paragraph (a), for the words “unless the court thinks it right in the circumstances of the case to specify a later date” there shall be substituted the words “unless the court considers that in the circumstances of the case the welfare of the child requires that it should extend to a later date”.
In section 20(11) of that Act (variation and revocation of orders for periodical payments) for the words “including any change” there shall be substituted the words “first consideration being given to the welfare while a minor of any child of the family who has not attained the age of eighteen, and the circumstances of the case shall include any change”.
For section 6 of the Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978 there shall be substituted the following section—
For section 20(2) of the Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978 (under which the court can vary a consent order by ordering the payment of a lump sum if the consent order provided for the payment of a lump sum) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
Where— either party to the marriage may apply to the court in the manner prescribed by rules of court for an order for financial relief under this Part of this Act.
a marriage has been dissolved or annulled, or the parties to a marriage have been legally separated, by means of judicial or other proceedings in an overseas country, and
the divorce, annulment or legal separation is entitled to be recognised as valid in England and Wales,
If after a marraige has been dissolved or annulled in an overseas country one of the parties to the marriage forms a subsequent marriage or civil partnership, that party shall not be entitled to make an application in relation to that marriage.
The reference in subsection (2) above to the forming of a subsequent marriage or civil partnership includes a reference to the forming of a marriage or civil partnership which is by law void or voidable.
In this Part of this Act except sections 19, 23, and 24 “order for financial relief” means an order under section 17 or 22 below of a description referred to in that section.
No application for an order for financial relief shall be made under this Part of this Act unless the leave of the court has been obtained in accordance with rules of court; and the court shall not grant leave unless it considers that there is substantial ground for the making of an application for such an order.
The court may grant leave under this section notwithstanding that an order has been made by a court in a country outside England and Wales requiring the other party to the marriage to make any payment or transfer any property to the applicant or a child of the family.
Leave under this section may be granted subject to such conditions as the court thinks fit.
Where leave is granted under section 13 above for the making of an application for an order for financial relief and it appears to the court that the applicant or any child of the family is in immediate need of financial assistance, the court may make an interim order for maintenance, that is to say, an order requiring the other party to the marriage to make to the applicant or to the child such periodical payments, and for such term, being a term beginning not earlier than the date of the grant of leave and ending with the date of the determination of the application for an order for financial relief, as the court thinks reasonable.
If it appears to the court that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for an order for financial relief by reason only of paragraph (c) of section 15(1) below the court shall not make an interim order under this section.
An interim order under subsection (1) above may be made subject to such conditions as the court thinks fit.
Subject to subsection (1A) below, the court shall have jurisdiction to entertain an application for an order for financial relief if any of the following jurisdictional requirements are satisfied, that is to say—
either of the parties to the marriage was domiciled in England and Wales on the date of the application for leave under section 13 above or was so domiciled on the date on which the divorce, annulment or legal separation obtained in the overseas country took effect in that country; or
either of the parties to the marriage was habitually resident in England and Wales throughout the period of one year ending with the date of the application for leave or was so resident throughout the period of one year ending with the date on which the divorce, annulment or legal separation obtained in the overseas country took effect in that country; or
either or both of the parties to the marriage had at the date of the application for leave a beneficial interest in possession in a dwelling-house situated in England or Wales which was at some time during the marriage a matrimonial home of the parties to the marriage.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
satisfaction of the requirements of subsection (1) above shall not obviate the need to satisfy the requirements imposed by virtue of Part I of that Act; and
satisfaction of the requirements imposed by virtue of Part I of that Act shall obviate the need to satisfy the requirements of subsection (1) above ;
If an application or part of an application relates to a matter in relation to which Article 18 of the 2007 Hague Convention applies, the court may not entertain the application or that part of it except where permitted by Article 18.
In this section, “the 2007 Hague Convention” means the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance concluded on 23 November 2007 at The Hague.
... Before making an order for financial relief the court shall consider whether in all the circumstances of the case it would be appropriate for such an order to be made by a court in England and Wales, and if the court is not satisfied that it would be appropriate, the court shall dismiss the application.
The court shall in particular have regard to the following matters—
the connection which the parties to the marriage have with England and Wales;
the connection which those parties have with the country in which the marriage was dissolved or annulled or in which they were legally separated;
the connection which those parties have with any other country outside England and Wales;
any financial benefit which the applicant or a child of the family has received, or is likely to receive, in consequence of the divorce, annulment or legal separation, by virtue of any agreement or the operation of the law of a country outside England and Wales;
in a case where an order has been made by a court in a country outside England and Wales requiring the other party to the marriage to make any payment or transfer any property for the benefit of the applicant or a child of the family, the financial relief given by the order and the extent to which the order has been complied with or is likely to be complied with;
any right which the applicant has, or has had, to apply for financial relief from the other party to the marriage under the law of any country outside England and Wales and if the applicant has omitted to exercise that right the reason for that omission;
the availability in England and Wales of any property in respect of which an order under this Part of this Act in favour of the applicant could be made;
the extent to which any order made under this Part of this Act is likely to be enforceable;
the length of time which has elapsed since the date of the divorce, annulment or legal separation.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subject to section 20 below, on an application by a party to a marriage for an order for financial relief under this section, the court may—
make any one or more of the orders which it could make under Part II of the 1973 Act if a divorce order, nullity of marriage order or judicial separation order in respect of the marriage had been made in England and Wales, that is to say—
any order mentioned in section 23(1) of the 1973 Act (financial provision orders); and
any order mentioned in section 24(1) of that Act (property adjustment orders); and
if the marriage has been dissolved or annulled, make one or more orders each of which would, within the meaning of that Part of that Act, be a pension sharing order in relation to the marriage.
if the marriage has been dissolved or annulled, make an order which would, within the meaning of that Part of that Act, be a pension compensation sharing order in relation to the marriage.
Subject to section 20 below, where the court makes a secured periodical payments order, an order for the payment of a lump sum or a property adjustment order under subsection (1) above, then, on making that order or at any time thereafter, the court may make any order mentioned in section 24A(1) of the 1973 Act (orders for sale of property) which the court would have power to make if the order under subsection (1) above had been made under Part II of the 1973 Act.
In deciding whether to exercise its powers under section 17 above and, if so, in what manner the court shall act in accordance with this section.
The court shall have regard to all the circumstances of the case, first consideration being given to the welfare while a minor of any child of the family who has not attained the age of eighteen.
As regards the exercise of those powers in relation to a party to the marriage, the court shall in particular have regard to the matters mentioned in section 25(2)(a) to (h) of the 1973 Act and shall be under duties corresponding with those imposed by section 25A(1) and (2) of the 1973 Act where it decides to exercise under section 17 above powers corresponding with the powers referred to in those subsections.
As regards the exercise of those powers in relation to a child of the family, the court shall in particular have regard to the matters mentioned in section 25(3)(a) to (e) of the 1973 Act.
The matters to which the court is to have regard under subsection (3) above—
so far as relating to paragraph (a) of section 25(2) of the 1973 Act, include any benefits under a pension arrangement which a party to the marriage has or is likely to have and any PPF compensation to which a party to the marriage is or is likely to be entitled, (whether or not in the foreseeable future), and
so far as relating to paragraph (h) of that provision, include —
any benefits under a pension arrangement which, by reason of the dissolution or annulment of the marriage, a party to the marriage will lose the chance of acquiring , and
any PPF compensation which, by reason of the dissolution or annulment of the marriage, a party to the marriage will lose the chance of acquiring entitlement to.
As regards the exercise of those powers against a party to the marriage in favour of a child of the family who is not the child of that party, the court shall also have regard to the matters mentioned in section 25(4)(a) to (c) of the 1973 Act.
Where an order has been made by a court outside England and Wales for the making of payments or the transfer of property by a party to the marriage, the court in considering in accordance with this section the financial resources of the other party to the marriage or a child of the family shall have regard to the extent to which that order has been complied with or is likely to be complied with.
In this section—
“pension arrangement” has the meaning given by section 25D(3) of the 1973 Act, and
references to benefits under a pension arrangement include any benefits by way of pension, whether under a pension arrangement or not , and
“PPF compensation” means compensation payable under—
Chapter 3 of Part 2 of the Pensions Act 2004 (pension protection) or any regulations or order made under it,
Chapter 1 of Part 3 of the Pensions Act 2008 (pension compensation sharing) or any regulations or order made under it, or
any provision corresponding to the provisions mentioned in sub-paragraph (i) or (ii) in force in Northern Ireland.
Notwithstanding anything in section 18 above, on an application for a consent order for financial relief the court may, unless it has reason to think that there are other circumstances into which it ought to inquire, make an order in the terms agreed on the basis only of the prescribed information furnished with the application.
Subsection (1) above applies to an application for a consent order varying or discharging an order for financial relief as it applies to an application for an order for financial relief.
In this section—
any proceedings before a Standing Civilian Court established under the Armed Forces Act 1976;
" order for financial relief " means an order under section 17 above; and
“order for financial relief” means an order under section 17 above; and
" prescribed " means prescribed by rules of court.
Where the court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for an order for financial relief by reason only of the situation in England or Wales of a dwelling-house which was a matrimonial home of the parties, the court may make under section 17 above any one or more of the following orders (but no other)—
an order that either party to the marriage shall pay to the other such lump sum as may be specified in the order;
an order that a party to the marriage shall pay to such person as may be so specified for the benefit of a child of the family, or to such a child, such lump sum as may be so specified;
an order that a party to the marriage shall transfer to the other party, to any child of the family or to such person as may be so specified for the benefit of such a child, the interest of the first-mentioned party in the dwelling-house, or such part of that interest as may be so specified;
an order that a settlement of the interest of a party to the marriage in the dwelling-house, or such part of that interest as may be so specified, be made to the satisfaction of the court for the benefit of the other party to the marriage and of the children of the family or either or any of them;
an order varying for the benefit of the parties to the marriage and of the children of the family or either or any of them any ante-nuptial or post-nuptial settlement (including such a settlement made by will or codicil) made on the parties to the marriage so far as that settlement relates to an interest in the dwelling-house;
an order extinguishing or reducing the interest of either of the parties to the marriage under any such settlement so far as that interest is an interest in the dwelling-house;
an order for the sale of the interest of a party to the marriage in the dwelling-house.
Where, in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1) above, the court makes an order for the payment of a lump sum by a party to the marriage, the amount of the lump sum shall not exceed, or where more than one such order is made the total amount of the lump sums shall not exceed in aggregate, the following amount, that is to say—
if the interest of that party in the dwelling-house is sold in pursuance of an order made under subsection (1)(g) above, the amount of the proceeds of the sale of that interest after deducting therefrom any costs incurred in the sale thereof;
if the interest of that party is not so sold, the amount which in the opinion of the court represents the value of that interest.
Where the interest of a party to the marriage in the dwelling-house is held jointly or in common with any other person or persons—
the reference in subsection (1)(g) above to the interest of a party to the marriage shall be construed as including a reference to the interest of that other person, or the interest of those other persons, in the dwelling-house, and
the reference in subsection (2)(a) above to the amount of the proceeds of a sale ordered under subsection (1)(g) above shall be construed as a reference to that part of those proceeds which is attributable to the interest of that party to the marriage in the dwelling-house.
section 23(3) (provisions as to lump sums);
The following provisions of Part II of the 1973 Act (financial relief for parties to marriage and children of family) shall apply in relation to an order ... under section 14 or 17 above as they apply in relation to a like order ... under that Part of that Act, that is to say—
section 23(3) (provisions as to lump sums);
section 24A(2), (4), (5) and (6) (provisions as to orders for sale);
section 24B(3) to (5) (provisions about pension sharing orders in relation to divorce and nullity);
section 24C (duty to stay pension sharing orders);
section 24D (apportionment of pension sharing charges);
section 24E(3) to (10) (provisions about pension compensation orders in relation to divorce and nullity);
section 24F (duty to stay pension compensation sharing orders);
section 24G (apportionment of pension compensation sharing charges);
section 25B(3) to (7B) (power, by financial provision order, to attach payments under a pension arrangement, or to require the exercise of a right of commutation under such an arrangement);
section 25C (extension of lump sum powers in relation to death benefits under a pension arrangement);
section 25E(2) to (10) (the Pension Protection Fund);
section 25F (power, by financial provision order, to attach pension compensation payments, or to require the exercise of a right of commutation of pension compensation);
section 28(1) and (2) (duration of continuing financial provision orders in favour of party to marriage);
section 29 (duration of continuing financial provision orders in favour of children, and age limit on making certain orders in their favour);
section 30 (direction for settlement of instrument for securing payments or effecting property adjustment), except paragraph (b);
section 31 (variation, discharge etc. of certain orders for financial relief), except subsection (2)(e) and subsection (4);
section 32 (payment of certain arrears unenforceable without the leave of the court);
section 33 (orders for repayment of sums paid under certain orders);
section 38 (orders for repayment of sums paid after cessation of order by reason of remarriage);
section 39 (settlements etc. made in compliance with a property adjustment order may be avoided on bankruptcy of settlor); and
section 40 (payments etc. under order made in favour of person suffering from mental disorder).
section 40A (appeals relating to pension sharing orders which have taken effect).
section 40B (appeals relating to pension compensation sharing orders which have taken effect).
section 24A(2), (4), (5) and (6) (provisions as to orders for sale);
Subsection (1)(bd) , (be) and (bg) above shall not apply where the court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for an order for financial relief by reason only of the situation in England or Wales of a dwelling-house which was a matrimonial home of the parties.
section 28(1) and (2) (duration of continuing financial provision orders in favour of party to marriage);
Section 25D(1) of the 1973 Act (effect of transfers on orders relating to rights under a pension arrangement) shall apply in relation to an order made under section 17 above by virtue of subsection (1)(bd) or (be) above as it applies in relation to an order made under section 23 of that Act by virtue of section 25B or 25C of the 1973 Act.
section 29 (duration of continuing financial provision orders in favour of children, and age limit on making certain orders in their favour);
The Lord Chancellor may by regulations make for the purposes of this Part of this Act provision corresponding to any provision which may be made by him under subsections (2) to (2B) of section 25D of the 1973 Act or under subsections (1) to (3) of section 25G of that Act.
section 30 (direction for settlement of instrument for securing payments or effecting property adjustment), except paragraph (b);
Power to make regulations under this section shall be exercisable by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
section 31 (variation, discharge etc. of certain orders for financial relief), except subsection (2)(e) and subsection (4);
section 32 (payment of certain arrears unenforceable without the leave of the court);
section 33 (orders for repayment of sums paid under certain orders);
section 38 (orders for repayment of sums paid after cessation of order by reason of remarriage);
section 39 (settlements etc. made in compliance with a property adjustment order may be avoided on bankruptcy of settlor); and
section 40 (payments etc. under order made in favour of person suffering from mental disorder).
one of the parties to the marriage is entitled, either in his or her own right or jointly with the other party, to occupy a dwelling-house situated in England or Wales by virtue of such a tenancy as is mentioned in paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 1 to the Matrimonial Homes Act 1983 (certain statutory tenancies), and
This section applies if—
an application is made by a party to a marriage for an order for financial relief; and
one of the parties is entitled, either in his own right or jointly with the other party, to occupy a dwelling-house situated in England or Wales by virtue of a tenancy which is a relevant tenancy within the meaning of Schedule 7 to the Family Law Act 1996 (certain statutory tenancies).
the dwelling-house has at some time during the marriage been a matrimonial home of the parties to the marriage,
The court may make in relation to that dwelling-house any order which it could make under Part II of that Schedule if a divorce order, nullity of marriage order or judicial separation order had been made in England and Wales in respect of the marriage.
The provisions of paragraphs 10, 11 and 14(1) in Part III of that Schedule apply in relation to any order under this section as they apply to any order under Part II of that Schedule.
For the purposes of this section “financial relief” means relief under section 14 or 17 above and any reference to defeating a claim by a party to a marriage for financial relief is a reference to preventing financial relief from being granted or reducing the amount of relief which might be granted, or frustrating or impeding the enforcement of any order which might be or has been made under either of those provisions at the instance of that party.
Where leave is granted under section 13 above for the making by a party to a marriage of an application for an order for financial relief under section 17 above, the court may, on an application by that party—
if it is satisfied that the other party to the marriage is, with the intention of defeating the claim for financial relief, about to make any disposition or to transfer out of the jurisdiction or otherwise deal with any property, make such order as it thinks fit for restraining the other party from so doing or otherwise for protecting the claim;
if it is satisfied that the other party has, with that intention, made a reviewable disposition and that if the disposition were set aside financial relief or different financial relief would be granted to the applicant, make an order setting aside the disposition.
Where an order for financial relief under section 14 or 17 above has been made by the court at the instance of a party to a marriage, then, on an application made by that party, the court may, if it is satisfied that the other party to the marriage has, with the intention of defeating the claim for financial relief, made a reviewable disposition, make an order setting aside the disposition.
Where the court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for an order for financial relief by reason only of paragraph (c) of section 15(1) above, it shall not make any order under subsection (2) or (3) above in respect of any property other than the dwelling-house concerned.
Where the court makes an order under subsection (2)(b) or (3) above setting aside a disposition it shall give such consequential directions as it thinks fit for giving effect to the order (including directions requiring the making of any payments or the disposal of any property).
Any disposition made by the other party to the marriage (whether before or after the commencement of the application) is a reviewable disposition for the purposes of subsections (2)(b) and (3) above unless it was made for valuable consideration (other than marriage) to a person who, at the time of the disposition, acted in relation to it in good faith and without notice of any intention on the part of the other party to defeat the applicant’s claim for financial relief.
Where an application is made under subsection (2) or (3) above with respect to a disposition which took place less than three years before the date of the application or with respect to a disposition or other dealing with property which is about to take place and the court is satisfied— of defeating a claim by the applicant for financial relief, it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is shown, that the person who disposed of or is about to dispose of or deal with the property did so or, as the case may be, is about to do so, with the intention of defeating the applicant’s claim for financial relief.
in a case falling within subsection (2)(a) or (b) above, that the disposition or other dealing would (apart from this section) have the consequence, or
in a case falling within subsection (3) above, that the disposition has had the consequence,
In this section “disposition” does not include any provision contained in a will or codicil but, with that exception, includes any conveyance, assurance or gift of property of any description, whether made by an instrument or otherwise.
The preceding provisions of this section are without prejudice to any power of the High Court to grant injunctions under section 37 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.
Where, on an application by a party to a marriage, it appears to the court— the court may make such order as it thinks fit for restraining the other party from taking such action as is mentioned in paragraph (c) above.
that the marriage has been dissolved or annulled, or that the parties to the marriage have been legally separated, by means of judicial or other proceedings in an overseas country; and
that the applicant intends to apply for leave to make an application for an order for financial relief under section 17 above as soon as he or she has been habitually resident in England and Wales for a period of one year; and
that the other party to the marriage is, with the intention of defeating a claim for financial relief, about to make any disposition or to transfer out of the jurisdiction or otherwise deal with any property,
For the purposes of an application under subsection (1) above—
the reference to defeating a claim for financial relief shall be construed in accordance with subsection (1) of section 23 above (omitting the reference to any order which has been made); and
subsections (7) and (8) of section 23 above shall apply as they apply for the purposes of an application under that section.
The preceding provisions of this section are without prejudice to any power of the High Court to grant injunctions under section 37 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.
The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 shall have effect with the following amendments, being amendments designed to give to persons whose marriages are dissolved or annulled overseas the same rights to apply for provision under that Act (as amended by section 8 of this Act) as persons whose marriages are dissolved or annulled under the 1973 Act.
“former wife” or “former husband” means a person whose marriage with the deceased was during the lifetime of the deceased either—
After section 15 (restriction in divorce proceedings etc. of applications under the Act) there shall be inserted the following section—
Section 28A of the Maintenance Orders (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1972 (complaint by former spouse in convention country for recovery in England and Wales of maintenance from other spouse) shall have effect with the following amendments.
For subsection (1) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
For subsection (4) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
Subsection (5) shall be omitted.
In this Part of this Act—
" furniture and plenishings " has the meaning assigned by section 22 of the Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981;
Section 46(1).
In section 16(2) of the Maintenance Orders Act 1950—
at the end of paragraph (a)(i) there shall be added the words “and section 14 or 17 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984”; and
at the end of paragraph (b)(i) there shall be added the words “or section 29 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984”.
In section 18 of that Act, after subsection (2), there shall be inserted the following subsection—
In section 7 of the Matrimonial Causes (Property and Maintenance) Act 1958, for subsection (6), there shall be substituted the following subsection—
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 4 of that Act, after subsection (6A) there shall be inserted the following subsection—
In section 33(2) of the Succession (Scotland) Act 1964, at the end there shall be added the words “or section 29 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984”.
In section 8(1)(c) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1966, at the end there shall be added the words “or section 29 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings 1984”.
In Schedule 8 to the Administration of Justice Act 1970 there shall be inserted at the end the following paragraph—
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 1(4) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 for the words “sections 3(3) and 5” there shall be substituted the words “section 5”.
In section 24A of that Act there shall be added at the end the following subsection—.
In section 27 of that Act—
in subsection (3A) for the words “section 25(1)(a) and (b) and (2)(a) to (e)” there shall be substituted the words “section 25(3)(a) to (e)” and for the words “section 25(3)” there shall be substituted the words “section 25(4)”;
in subsection (3B) for the words “section 25(1)(c)” there shall be substituted the words “section 25(2)(c) above” and for the words “section 25(2)(d)” there shall be substituted the words “section 25(2)(c) above (as it applies by virtue of section 25(3)(e) above)”.
In section 35 of that Act—
in subsection (2) for the words “section 25(3)” there shall be substituted the words “section 25(4)”;
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 47(2) of that Act after paragraph (d) there shall be inserted the following paragraph—.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 5(1) of the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973, for the words “the Matrimonial Causes Act 1967” there shall be substituted the words “Part V of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984”.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 100 of the Children Act 1975—
in subsection (2)(c) for the words “section 75 of the County Courts Act 1984” there shall be substituted the words “section 9(3) of the 1958 Act or section 40 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984”; and
after subsection (9) there shall be inserted the following subsection—
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
in subsection (2)(c) for the words " section 75 of the County Courts Act 1984 " there shall be substituted the words " section 66(1) of this Act; " and
after subsection (6) there shall be inserted the following subsection—
In section 1 of the Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978 the words “(in this Part of this Act referred to as “the respondent”)” shall be omitted.
In section 7(5) of that Act, for the words “subsection (1)” there shall be substituted the words “subsection (2)(c)”.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
in subsection (2), after the words " of this Act" there shall be inserted the words " on an application for an order under section 2 or 7 of this Act, ";
after subsection (2) there shall be inserted the following subsection—;
in subsection (5), after the words " subsection (2) " there shall be inserted " (2A) " and for the words " section 3(2) " there shall be substituted the words " section 3(3) ";
in subsection (6) after the words " subsection (2)(a) " there shall be inserted " (2A)(a) ", and
in subsection (7) after the words " subsection (2)(b) ", in both places where they occur, there shall be inserted " (2A)(b) " .
In section 19 of that Act, after subsection (3), there shall be inserted the following subsection—
In section 20(8) of that Act, after the word “respondent” there shall be inserted the words “or the applicant, as the case may be,”.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In Schedule 1 to that Act—
in paragraph 2, after sub-paragraph (b), there shall be inserted the following sub-paragraph—; and
in paragraph 3, at the end, there shall be added the words “but as respects enactments amended by this Act in their application in relation to orders made or decisions on applications for orders or for the variation, revival or revocation of orders made or having effect as if made under other Acts those enactments shall apply as amended by this Act”.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In section 41 of that Act there shall be added at the end of subsection (2) the words “but shall be exercised in relation to family proceedings (within the meaning of Part V of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984) in accordance with any directions given under section 37 of that Act (directions as to distribution and transfer of family business and proceedings).”
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 46(2)
Where at the coming into force of section 1 of this Act— nothing in section 1 of this Act shall prohibit the presentation of a petition for divorce before the expiration of that period; and in relation to such a case sections 1(4) and 3 of that Act of 1973 as in force immediately before the coming into force of section 1 of this Act shall continue to apply. Where at the coming into force of section 1 of this Act— the proceedings shall abate but without prejudice to the powers of the court as to costs.
An application for leave under section 13(4) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to institute proceedings after the expiration of the period of three years from the date of the marriage may be made where that period expired before as well as where it expires after the coming into force of section 2 of this Act.
For the purposes of Part V of this Act “matrimonial cause” shall, until the expiration of one year from the coming into force of section 1 of this Act, include an application under section 3 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
Section 46(3) Chapter Short title Extent of repeal 1967 c. 56. Matrimonial Causes Act 1967. The whole Act. 1971 c. 3. Guardianship of Minors Act 1971. Section 16(1). 1971 c. 23. Courts Acts 1971. Section 45. 1973 c. 18. Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Section 43(9). Section 44(6). Section 45(3). Sections 50 and 51. In Schedule 2, paragraphs 6 and 12. 1973 c. 45. Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973. Section 6(4)(a). 1975 c. 72. Children Act 1975. Section 101(1). 1976 c. 36. Adoption Act 1976. Section 63(1). 1978 c. 22. Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1978. In Schedule 2, paragraph 49. 1981 c. 24. Matrimonial Homes and Property Act 1981. Section 8(1). 1983 c. 19. Matrimonial Homes Act 1983. In Schedule 1, paragraph 8(3) and (4), and in paragraph 10(1), the definitions of “divorce county court” and “divorce registry”. 1984 c. 28. County Courts Act 1984. In section 147(1), the definition of “matrimonial cause”.
" child of the family " has the same meaning as in section 52(1) of the 1973 Act;
a conviction in service disciplinary proceedings (in England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, or elsewhere), including— in the case of proceedings in respect of a service offence, anything that under section 376(1) and (2) of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (which relates to summary hearings and the Summary Appeal Court) is to be treated as a conviction for the purposes of that Act, and in the case of any other service disciplinary proceedings, a finding of guilt in those proceedings;
“consent order”, in relation to an application for an order, means an order in the terms applied for to which the respondent agrees;
“the court” means the High Court or the family court;
“prescribed” means prescribed by rules of court.
“order for financial relief” has the meaning given by section 12(4) above;
Where parties to a marriage have been divorced in an overseas country, then, subject to subsection (3A) below, if the jurisdiction requirements and the conditions set out in subsections (2) and (3) below respectively are satisfied, the court may entertain an application by one of the parties for an order for financial provision.
The jurisdictional requirements mentioned in subsection (1) above are that—
the applicant was domiciled or habitually resident in Scotland on the date when the application was made; and
the other party to the marriage—
was domiciled or habitually resident in Scotland on the date when the application was made; or
was domiciled or habitually resident in Scotland when the parties last lived together as husband and wife; or
on the date when the application was made, was an owner or tenant of, or had a beneficial interest in, property in Scotland which had at some time been a matrimonial home of the parties; and
where the court is the sheriff court, either—
one of the parties was, on the date when the application was made, habitually resident in the sheriffdom; or
paragraph (b)(iii) above is satisfied in respect of property wholly or partially within the sheriffdom.
The conditions mentioned in subsection (1) above are that—
the divorce falls to be recognised in Scotland;
the other party to the marriage initiated the proceedings for divorce;
the application was made within five years after the date when the divorce took effect;
a court in Scotland would have had jurisdiction to entertain an action for divorce between the parties if such an action had been brought in Scotland immediately before the foreign divorce took effect;
the marriage had a substantial connection with Scotland; and
both parties are living at the time of the application.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
satisfaction of the requirements of subsection (2) above shall not obviate the need to satisfy the requirements imposed by virtue of Part I of that Act; and
satisfaction of the requirements imposed by virtue of Part I of that Act shall obviate the need to satisfy the requirements of subsection (2) above ;
If an application or part of an application relates to a matter in relation to which Article 18 of the 2007 Hague Convention applies, the court may not entertain the application or that part of it except where permitted by Article 18.
“The 2007 Hague Convention” means the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance concluded on 23 November 2007 at The Hague.
Subject to subsections (2) to (5) below, Scots law shall apply, with any necessary modifications, in relation to an application under section 28 above as it would apply if the application were being made in an action for divorce in Scotland.
In disposing of an application entertained by it under the said section 28, the court shall exercise its powers so as to place the parties, in so far as it is reasonable and practicable to do so, in the financial position in which they would have been if the application had been disposed of, in an action for divorce in Scotland, on the date on which the foreign divorce took effect.
In determining what is reasonable and practicable for the purposes of subsection (2) above, the court shall have regard in particular to—
the parties’ resources, present and foreseeable at the date of disposal of the application;
any order made by a foreign court in or in connection with the divorce proceedings for the making of financial provision in whatever form, or the transfer of property, by one of the parties to the other; and
subsection (5) below.
Except where subsection (5) below applies, the court may make an order for an interim award of a periodical allowance where—
it appears from the applicant’s averments that in the disposal of the application an order for financial provision is likely to be made; and
the court considers that such an interim award is necessary to avoid hardship to the applicant.
Where but for section 28(2)(b)(iii) above the court would not have jurisdiction to entertain the application, the court may make an order— but shall not be entitled to make any other order for financial provision.
relating to the former matrimonial home or its furniture and plenishings; or
that the other party to the marriage shall pay to the applicant a capital sum not exceeding the value of that other party’s interest in the former matrimonial home and its furniture and plenishings,
In the foregoing provisions of this Part of this Act unless the context otherwise requires—
“specified evidence” means evidence specified, or of a description specified, in regulations made by the Lord Chancellor.
" matrimonial home " has the meaning assigned by the said section 22;
“matrimonial home” has the meaning assigned by the said section 22;
“family proceedings” means—
proceedings in the Family Division of the High Court which are business assigned, by or under section 61 of (and Schedule 1 to) the Senior Courts Act 1981, to that Division of the High Court and no other, and
proceedings in the civil division of the Court of Appeal arising out of proceedings within paragraph (a) or (b);
“order for financial provision” means any one or more of the orders specified in section 8(1) of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 (financial provision) or an order under section 13 of the Matrimonial Homes (Family Protection) (Scotland) Act 1981 (transfer of tenancy of matrimonial home);
“specified offence” means an offence which is specified, or of a description specified, in regulations made by the Lord Chancellor.
Any reference in the foregoing provisions of this Part of this Act to a party to a marriage shall include a reference to a party to a marriage which has been terminated.
This Part of this Act shall apply to an annulment, of whatever nature, of a purported marriage, as it applies to a divorce, and references to marriage and divorce shall be construed accordingly.
Section 31(4) of the Maintenance Orders (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1972 (recovery of maintenance in Scotland from former spouse on order made in convention country) shall have effect with the following amendments.
In paragraph (i), for the words “granted in a convention country” there shall be substituted the words “obtained in a country or territory outside the United Kingdom”.
For paragraph (ii) there shall be substituted the following paragraphs—.
In this Part of this Act— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Lord Chancellor may by order designate any county court as a divorce county court and any court so designated shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any matrimonial cause, except that it shall have jurisdiction to try such a cause only if it is also designated in the order as a court of trial. In this Part of this Act " divorce county court" means a county court so designated.
The jurisdiction conferred by this section on a divorce county court shall be exercisable throughout England and Wales, but rules of court may provide for a matrimonial cause pending in one such court to be heard and determined in another or partly in that and partly in another.
Every matrimonial cause shall be commenced in a divorce county court and shall be heard and determined in that or another such court unless or except to the extent it is transferred to the High Court under section 39 below or section 41 of the County Courts Act 1984 (transfer to High Court by order of High Court).
The Lord Chancellor may by order designate a divorce county court as a court for the exercise of jurisdiction in matrimonial matters arising under Part III of this Act.
The power to make an order under subsection (1) or (4) above shall be exercisable by statutory instrument.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subject to subsections (2) and (3) below, a divorce county court shall have the following jurisdiction, namely—
jurisdiction to exercise any power exercisable under Part II or Part III of the 1973 Act in connection with any petition, decree or order pending in or made by such a court and to exercise any power under section 27 or 35 of that Act;
if designated by an order under section 33(4) above, jurisdiction to exercise any power under Part III of this Act.
Any proceedings for the exercise of a power which a divorce county court has jurisdiction to exercise by virtue of subsection (1)(a) or (b) above shall be commenced in such divorce county court as may be prescribed by rules of court.
A divorce county court shall not by virtue of subsection (1)(a) above have jurisdiction to exercise any power under section 32, 33, 36 or 38 of the 1973 Act; but nothing in this section shall prejudice the exercise by a county court of any jurisdiction conferred on county courts by any of those sections.
Nothing in this section shall affect the jurisdiction of a magistrates' court under section 35 of the 1973 Act.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The President of the Family Division may, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, give directions with respect to the distribution and transfer between the High Court and the family court of family business and family proceedings.
At any stage in any family proceedings in the High Court the High Court may, if the proceedings are transferable under this section, either of its own motion or on the application of any party to the proceedings, order the transfer of the whole or any part of the proceedings to the family court.
The following family proceedings are transferable to the family court under this section, namely—
all family proceedings commenced in the High Court which are within the jurisdiction of the family court;
wardship proceedings, except applications for an order that a minor be made, or cease to be, a ward of court or any other proceedings which relate to the exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court with respect to minors; and
all family proceedings transferred ... to the High Court under section 39 below or section 41 of the County Courts Act 1984 (transfer to High Court by order of High Court); and
all matrimonial causes and matters transferred from the family court or a county court otherwise than as mentioned in paragraph (c) above.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The transfer shall not affect any right of appeal from the order directing the transfer, or the right to enforce in the High Court any judgment signed, or order made, in that Court before the transfer.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Where proceedings are transferred to the family court under this section, the family court—
if it has no jurisdiction apart from this paragraph, shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine those proceedings;
shall have jurisdiction to award any relief which could have been awarded by the High Court.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At any stage in any family proceedings in the family court, the family court may, if the proceedings are transferable under this section, either of its own motion or on the application of any party to the proceedings, order the transfer of the whole or any part of the proceedings to the High Court.
The following family proceedings are transferable to the High Court under this section, namely—
all family proceedings commenced in the family court which are within the jurisdiction of the High Court, and
all family proceedings transferred from the High Court under section 38 above.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subject to subsection (2) below, the power to make rules of court for the purposes of family proceedings in the High Court or county courts shall be exercisable by the Lord Chancellor together with any four or more of the following persons, namely—
the President of the Family Division,
one puisne judge attached to that Division,
one registrar of the principal registry of that Division,
two Circuit Judges,
one registrar appointed under the County Courts Act 1984,
two practising barristers, and
two practising solicitors, of whom one shall be a member of the Council of the Law Society and the other a member of the Law Society and also of a local law society.
Subsection (1) above is without prejudice to the powers of the following authorities to make rules in respect of the matters referred to below and rules in respect of those matters shall continue to be made by those authorities and shall not be made by the authority constituted by subsection (1) above. The rules and rule-making authorities are—
adoption rules made by the Lord Chancellor under section 9(3) of the Adoption Act 1958, section 12(1) of the Adoption Act 1968 or section 66(1) of the Adoption Act 1976;
probate rules made by the President of the Family Division with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor under section 127 of the Supreme Court Act 1981.
The persons to act in pursuance of subsection (1) above with the Lord Chancellor, other than the President of the Family Division, shall be appointed by the Lord Chancellor for such time as he may think fit.
Rules made under this section may, in relation to county court rules, do anything which, as special rules, they are authorised by section 84 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 to do in relation to Supreme Court Rules and may—
modify or exclude the application of any provision of the County Courts Act 1984 ; and
provide for the enforcement in the High Court of orders made in a divorce county court.
Rules of court under this section shall be made by statutory instrument subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament; and the Statutory Instruments Act 1946 shall apply to a statutory instrument containing such rules as if the rules had been made by a Minister of the Crown.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sections 33 to 35 above shall not prevent the commencement of any proceedings in the principal registry except where rules of court under section 34(2) above otherwise provide; and the following provisions of this section shall have effect for the purposes of enabling proceedings to be dealt with in that registry as in a divorce county court.
The jurisdiction in matrimonial causes or matters conferred by sections 33, 34 and 35 above on divorce county courts shall be exercised in the principal registry— and rules of court may make provision for treating, for any purposes specified in the rules, matrimonial causes and matters pending in the registry with respect to which that jurisdiction is exercisable as pending in a divorce county court and for the application of section 74(3) of the Solicitors Act 1974 (costs) with respect to proceedings so treated.
so far as it is exercisable by judges of such courts, at such sittings and in such places as the Lord Chancellor may direct; and
so far as it is exercisable by registrars of such courts, by such registrars or by registrars and other officers of the principal registry according as rules of court may provide;
Where, by virtue of rules under subsection (2) above, a matrimonial cause is pending in the registry as in a divorce county court, any ancillary or related proceedings which could be taken in a divorce county court and which are not of a description excluded by the rules from the operation of this subsection may be taken and dealt with in the registry as in a divorce county court.
The principal registry shall be treated as a divorce county court—
for the purposes of any provision to be made by rules of court under section 33(2) above ;
for the purpose of any provision to be made under section 34(2) above prescribing the county court in which any proceedings are to be commenced ; and
for the purpose of any transfer of family proceedings under section 38 or 39 above between the High Court and a divorce county court.
Rules of court shall make provision for securing, with respect to family proceedings dealt with under this section, that, as nearly as may be, the same consequences shall follow—
as regards service of process, as if proceedings commenced in the principal registry had been commenced in a divorce county court; and
as regards enforcement of orders, as if orders made in that registry in the exercise of the family jurisdiction conferred by sections 33, 34 and 35 above on divorce county courts were orders made by such a court.
In this section " the principal registry " means the principal registry of the Family Division of the High Court and, for the purposes of subsection (3) above, proceedings are " ancillary " to a matrimonial cause if they are connected with the cause and are " related " to a matrimonial cause if they are for protecting or otherwise relate to any rights, or the exercise of any rights, of the parties to the marriage as husband and wife or any children of the family.
to the High Court or such county court as may be prescribed and the court may, on such an application (which may be heard in private), make such order with respect to the property as it thinks fit. In this section “prescribed” means prescribed by rules of court and rules made for the purposes of this section may confer jurisdiction on county courts whatever the situation or value of the property in dispute.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
There is to be a court in England and Wales, called the family court, for the purpose of exercising the jurisdiction and powers conferred on it—
by or under this or any other Act, or
by or under any Act, or Measure, of the National Assembly for Wales.
The family court is to be a court of record and have a seal.
Sittings of the family court may be held, and any other business of the family court may be conducted, at any place in England and Wales.
Sittings of the family court at any place may be continuous or intermittent or occasional.
Sittings of the family court may be held simultaneously to take any number of different cases in the same place or different places, and the court may adjourn cases from place to place at any time.
The places at which the family court sits, and the days and times at which it sits in any place, are to be determined in accordance with directions given by the Lord Chancellor after consulting the Lord Chief Justice.
The Lord Chief Justice may nominate a judicial office holder (as defined in section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise functions of the Lord Chief Justice under this section.
A person is a judge of the family court if the person— ...
is the Lord Chief Justice,
is the Master of the Rolls,
is the President of the Queen's Bench Division,
is the President of the Family Division,
is the Chancellor of the High Court,
is an ordinary judge of the Court of Appeal (including the vice-president, if any, of either division of that court),
is the Senior President of Tribunals,
is a puisne judge of the High Court,
is a deputy judge of the High Court,
is a Circuit judge,
is the Judge Advocate General,
is a Recorder,
holds an office listed—
in the first column of the table in section 89(3C) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (senior High Court Masters etc), or
in column 1 of Part 2 of Schedule 2 to that Act (High Court Masters etc),
is a district judge (which, by virtue of section 8(1C) of the County Courts Act 1984, here includes a deputy district judge appointed under section 8 of that Act),
is a deputy district judge appointed under section 102 of the Senior Courts Act 1981,
is a Chamber President, or a Deputy Chamber President, of a chamber of the Upper Tribunal or of a chamber of the First-tier Tribunal,
is a judge of the Upper Tribunal by virtue of appointment under paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 3 to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007,
is a transferred-in judge of the Upper Tribunal (see section 31(2) of that Act),
is a deputy judge of the Upper Tribunal (whether under paragraph 7 of Schedule 3 to, or section 31(2) of, that Act),
is a judge of the First-tier Tribunal by virtue of appointment under paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 2 to that Act,
is a transferred-in judge of the First-tier Tribunal (see section 31(2) of that Act),
is a member of a panel of Employment Judges established for England and Wales or for Scotland,
is a person appointed under section 30(1)(a) or (b) of the Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1951 (assistants to the Judge Advocate General),
is a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts), or
is a justice of the peace who is not a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts),
A decision of the family court, if made by or by persons who include— is (so far as relevant) to be followed by a judge within subsection (1)(j) to (y), and by a person authorised under section 67B(2) of the Courts Act 2003, when carrying out functions of the family court unless doing so with a person within paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection.
a judge within subsection (1)(a) to (i),
a person who has been a judge of the Court of Appeal, or
a person who has been a puisne judge of the High Court,
A fee-paid, or unsalaried, part-time judge of the family court may not act as a judge of the court in relation to any proceedings in the court in which the judge, or a partner or employer of the judge, or a body of which the judge is a member or officer, or a body of whose governing body the judge is a member, is directly or indirectly engaged as legal representative or agent for any party.
In this section “legal representative” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience or the conduct of litigation (within the meaning of that Act).
Rules may be made in accordance with Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (process for making designated rules) about—
the composition of the family court, and
the distribution of business of the family court among judges of the court.
Rules about the composition of the family court may in particular—
provide for the court to be constituted differently for the purpose of deciding different matters;
make provision about who is to preside where the court is composed of more than one judge.
Rules about the distribution of business of the family court may in particular—
prohibit specified judges from conducting specified business;
prohibit judges from conducting specified business unless authorised to do so by a specified judicial office holder;
prohibit specified judges from conducting business, or specified business, unless authorised to do so by a specified judicial office holder;
prohibit specified judges from exercising specified powers of the court.
In subsection (3)—
a finding in any criminal proceedings (including a finding linked with a finding of insanity) that the person concerned has committed an offence or done the act or made the omission charged;
“specified” means specified in, or of a description specified in, rules under this section.
Rules under this section—
may confer powers on the Lord Chief Justice or on a judicial office holder;
may be made only after consultation with the Family Procedure Rule Committee.
Family Procedure Rules are subject to rules under this section.
The Lord Chief Justice's power under paragraph 2(2)(b) of Schedule 1 to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to nominate a judicial office holder to make rules under this section includes power to nominate different judicial office holders to make rules under this section for different purposes.
Paragraph 5 of that Schedule (duty to make rules to achieve purpose specified by Lord Chancellor) does not apply in relation to rules under this section.
In this section “judicial office holder” has the meaning given by section 109(4) of that Act.
No proceedings in the family court are to be with a jury.
In any proceedings in the family court, the court may make any order—
which could be made by the High Court if the proceedings were in the High Court, or
which could be made by the county court if the proceedings were in the county court.
In its application to a power of the High Court to issue a writ directed to an enforcement officer, subsection (1)(a) gives the family court power to issue a warrant, directed to an officer of the family court, containing provision corresponding to any that might be contained in the writ.
Subsection (1) is subject to section 38(3) of the County Courts Act 1984.
Subsection (1) is without prejudice to, and not limited by, any other powers of the family court.
The Lord Chancellor may by regulations make provision, about or in connection with the effect or execution of warrants issued by the family court for enforcing any order or judgment enforceable by the court, that corresponds to any provision applying in relation to the effect or execution of writs issued by the High Court, or warrants issued by the county court, for the purpose of enforcing any order or judgment enforceable by that court.
The family court may adjourn a hearing, and may do so at any time including a time before the hearing has begun.
Any order made by the family court—
may be absolute or conditional;
may be final or interim;
may, subject to rules of court, be made without taking evidence.
Every judgment and order of the family court is, except as provided by this or any other Act or by rules of court, final and conclusive between the parties.
Where the family court has power to require the doing of anything other than the payment of money, or to prohibit the doing of anything, an order of the court made in exercising the power may contain provision—
as to the manner in which anything is to be done,
as to the time within which anything is to be done,
as to the time during which anything is not to be done, and
generally for giving effect to the order.
Where the family court has power to require the payment of money, an order of the court made in exercising the power may allow time for payment or order payment by instalments; and where the court has ordered payment by instalments and default is made in the payment of any one instalment, proceedings may be taken as if the default had been made in the payment of all the instalments then unpaid.
The family court has power to vary, suspend, rescind or revive any order made by it, including—
power to rescind an order and re-list the application on which it was made,
power to replace an order which for any reason appears to be invalid by another which the court has power to make, and
power to vary an order with effect from when it was originally made.
Subject to rules of court, the family court may proceed in the absence of one, some or all of the parties.
The family court has the same power to enforce an undertaking given by a solicitor in relation to any proceedings in that court as the High Court has to enforce an undertaking given by a solicitor in relation to any proceedings in the High Court.
In any case not expressly provided for by or in pursuance of this or any other Act, the general principles of practice in the High Court may be adopted and applied to proceedings in the family court.
Subsection (2) applies where the family court is satisfied that a person in England and Wales is likely to be able to give material evidence, or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence, in proceedings in the court.
The court may, if it is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to do so, issue a summons—
requiring the person to attend before the court, at the time and place specified in the summons, to give evidence,
requiring the person to attend before the court, at the time and place specified in the summons, to produce the document or thing, or
requiring the person to produce the document or thing to the court.
Subsection (4) applies where without just excuse—
a person fails to attend before the court in answer to a summons under subsection (2)(a) or (b),
a person fails to produce a document or thing in answer to a summons under subsection (2)(b) or (c), or
a person attending before the court, whether or not in answer to a summons under subsection (2), refuses to be sworn or give evidence.
The court may—
commit the person to custody until the expiry of a period not exceeding one month specified by the court or until the person sooner gives evidence or produces the document or thing, or
impose on the person a fine not exceeding £2,500, or
both.
A fine imposed under subsection (4) is deemed, for the purposes of any enactment, to be a sum adjudged to be paid by a conviction of a magistrates' court.
Where in any proceedings in the family court it appears to the court that any party to the proceedings who is not legally represented is unable to examine or cross-examine a witness effectively, the court is to—
ascertain from that party the matters about which the witness may be able to depose or on which the witness ought to be cross-examined, and
put, or cause to be put, to the witness such questions in the interests of that party as may appear to the court to be proper.
Subject to the provisions of any Act or instrument made under an Act or rule of law authorising the reception of unsworn evidence, evidence given before the family court is to be given on oath.
An affidavit to be used in the family court may be sworn before— as well as before a commissioner for oaths or any other person authorised to take affidavits under the Commissioners for Oaths Acts 1889 and 1891.
a judge of the court, or
an officer of the court appointed by a judge of the court for the purpose,
An affidavit sworn before any such judge or officer may be sworn without the payment of any fee.
The Lord Chancellor may by regulations made after consulting the Lord Chief Justice make provision limiting or removing, in circumstances specified in the regulations, any of the powers exercisable by the family court when dealing with a person for contempt of court.
The Lord Chief Justice may nominate a judicial office holder (as defined in section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise functions of the Lord Chief Justice under this section.
If the High Court, at any stage in proceedings in the family court, thinks it desirable that the proceedings, or any part of them, should be transferred to the High Court, it may order the transfer to the High Court of the proceedings or part.
The power given by subsection (1) is without prejudice to section 29 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, and is to be exercised—
in accordance with any directions given as to the distribution or transfer of proceedings, and
subject to any provision made under section 1 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 or made by or under any other enactment.
The powers of the family court include its powers under—
section 33 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (powers exercisable before commencement of action);
section 34 of that Act (power to order disclosure or inspection of documents or property of non-party);
section 37 of that Act (power to grant injunction or appoint receiver);
section 39 of that Act (power to order documents to be executed or indorsed by nominated person);
section 70(1) and (2) of that Act (assessors);
section 57 of the County Courts Act 1984 (evidence of prisoners);
section 71 of that Act (powers as to payment of costs).
Subject to any order made under section 56(1) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (power to provide for appeals to be made instead to the High Court or county court, or to the family court itself), if any party to any proceedings in the family court is dissatisfied with the decision of the court, that party may appeal from it to the Court of Appeal in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be provided by Family Procedure Rules.
Subsection (1) does not— and has effect subject to any enactment other than this Part; and in this subsection “enactment” means an enactment whenever passed.
confer any right of appeal from any decision where a right of appeal is conferred by some other enactment, or
take away any right of appeal from any decision where a right of appeal is so conferred,
The Lord Chancellor may, after consulting the Lord Chief Justice, by order make provision as to the circumstances in which appeals may be made against decisions taken by courts or judges on questions arising in connection with the transfer, or proposed transfer, of proceedings from or to the family court.
Except to the extent provided for in any order made under subsection (3), no appeal may be made against any decision of a kind mentioned in that subsection.
At the hearing of any proceedings in the family court in which there is a right of appeal or from which an appeal may be brought with permission, the judge, if requested to do so by any party, is to make a note—
of any question of law raised at the hearing,
of the facts in evidence in relation to any such question, and
of the court's decision on any such question and of the court's determination of the proceedings.
Where such a note is made, and whether or not an appeal has been made, the court— is to provide that party with a copy of the note signed by the judge, and the copy so signed is to be used at the hearing of any appeal.
on the application of any party to the proceedings, and
on payment of the fee (if any) prescribed under section 92 of the Courts Act 2003,
Section 81 of the County Courts Act 1984 (powers of Court of Appeal on appeal from county court) applies to appeals from the family court to the Court of Appeal as it applies to appeals from the county court to the Court of Appeal.
The Lord Chief Justice may nominate a judicial office holder (as defined in section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise functions of the Lord Chief Justice under subsection (3).
Payment of a fine or penalty imposed by the family court may be enforced upon the order of the court in like manner as a judgment of the court for the payment of money.
Rules of court may, in relation to cases where under two or more orders made by or registered in the family court the same person is required to make periodical payments to the same recipient, make provision—
for recovery of payments under more than one of the orders to be dealt with in the same proceedings;
for apportioning, between some or all of the orders, payments made by the person required to make payments under the orders.
Subsection (4) applies where—
periodical payments are required to be made, or a lump sum is required to be paid, to a child under an order made by the family court, or
periodical payments are required to be made to a child under an order registered in the family court.
Any sum required under the order to be paid to the child may be paid to the person who looks after the child, and that person may proceed in that person's own name for—
the variation, revival or revocation of the order, or
the recovery of any sum required to be paid under the order.
Where a child has a right under any Act or instrument made under an Act to apply for the revival of an order made by the family court which provided for the making of periodical payments to or for the benefit of the child, the person who looks after the child may proceed in the person's own name for the revival of the order.
Where any person by whom periodical payments are required to be paid to a child under an order made by or registered in the family court applies for the variation or revocation of the order, the person who looks after the child may answer the application in the person's own name.
Nothing in subsections (4) and (5) affects any right of a child to proceed in the child's own name for the variation, revival or revocation of an order or for the recovery of a sum payable under an order.
In this section—
a reference to the person who looks after a child is—
in the case of a child who is being looked after by a local authority (within the meaning of section 22 of the Children Act 1989 or section 74 of the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014), a reference to that local authority, and
in any other case, a reference to the person who, disregarding any absence of the child at a hospital or boarding school and any other temporary absence, has care of the child;
“child” means a person under the age of 18;
a reference to an order registered in the family court is a reference to an order registered in the court under the Maintenance Orders (Facilities for Enforcement) Act 1920, Part 2 of the Maintenance Orders Act 1950, Part 1 of the Maintenance Orders Act 1958 or the Maintenance Orders (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1972 ....
The Lord Chancellor may by regulations provide for the keeping of records of and in relation to proceedings of the family court.
Any entry in a book or other document required to be kept by regulations under subsection (1), or a copy of any such entry or document purporting to be signed and certified as a true copy by a judge of the family court, is at all times without further proof to be admitted in any court or place as evidence of the entry and of the proceeding referred to by it and of the regularity of that proceeding.
The Lord Chancellor must consult the Lord Chief Justice before making regulations under this section.
The Lord Chief Justice may nominate a judicial office holder (as defined in section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005) to exercise functions of the Lord Chief Justice under this section.
Where any summons or other process issued from the family court is served by an officer of the court, the service may be proved by a certificate in a prescribed form showing the fact and mode of the service.
Section 133(2) of the County Courts Act 1984 (offence and punishment) applies in relation to any officer of the family court wilfully and corruptly giving a false certificate under subsection (1) as it applies in relation to any officer of the county court wilfully and corruptly giving a false certificate under section 133(1) of that Act.
Sections 135 and 136 of that Act (offences of pretending to have court's authority etc) apply in relation to the family court as they apply in relation to the county court.
The Lord Chief Justice may authorise a person—
to give advice to judges of the family court about matters of law (including procedure and practice) on questions arising in connection with the discharge by them of functions conferred on them or the court, including questions arising when the person is not personally attending on them, and
to bring to the attention of judges of the family court, at any time when the person thinks appropriate, any point of law (including procedure and practice) that is or may be involved in any question so arising.
The Lord Chief Justice may authorise a person under subsection (1) only if the person—
is appointed under section 2(1) of the Courts Act 2003 or section 40(1) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, and
has such qualifications as may be prescribed by regulations made by the Lord Chancellor with the agreement of the Lord Chief Justice.
An authorisation under subsection (1)—
may be subject to conditions, and
may be varied or revoked by the Lord Chief Justice at any time.
The Lord Chief Justice may give directions to a person authorised to exercise functions under subsection (1).
Apart from such directions, a person authorised to exercise functions under subsection (1) is not subject to the direction of the Lord Chancellor or any other person when exercising the functions.
The Lord Chief Justice may nominate one or more of the following to exercise the Lord Chief Justice's functions under the preceding provisions of this section—
a judicial office holder;
a person appointed under section 2(1) of the Courts Act 2003 or section 40(1) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
A person nominated under subsection (6)(b) to exercise functions of the Lord Chief Justice is not subject to the direction of any person other than— when exercising the functions.
the Lord Chief Justice, or
a judicial office holder nominated by the Lord Chief Justice,
In this section “judicial office holder” has the meaning given by section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.
Any power of the Lord Chancellor to make an order, regulations or rules under this Part—
is exercisable by statutory instrument,
includes power to make different provision for different purposes, and
includes power to make supplementary, incidental, consequential, transitional, transitory or saving provision.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A statutory instrument that— is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
contains an order, regulations or rules made under this Part by the Lord Chancellor other than regulations under section 31M, and
is not subject to any requirement that a draft of the instrument be laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament,
Section 29A of the Maintenance Orders (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1972 (complaint by former spouse in convention country for recovery in Northern Ireland of maintenance from other spouse) shall have effect with the following amendments.
For subsection (1) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
For subsection (4) there shall be substituted the following subsection—
Subsection (5) shall be omitted.
The enactments specified in Schedule 1 to this Act shall have effect subject to the amendments specified in that Schedule, being amendments consequential on the provisions of this Act or minor amendments relating to the enforcement of maintenance orders, the area of jurisdiction of magistrates’ courts for purposes of altering maintenance agreements and the variation by magistrates’ courts of certain existing maintenance, affiliation and other orders.
The transitional provisions contained in Schedule 2 to this Act shall have effect.
The enactments specified in Schedule 3 to this Act (which include some which are spent) are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Schedule.
The provisions of this Act other than this section and section 48 below shall come into force as follows—
with the exception of section 10, Parts I and II and paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 2 shall come into force at the expiry of the period of three months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed and that section shall come into force on such day as the Lord Chancellor appoints;
Part III shall come into force on such day as the Lord Chancellor appoints;
Schedule 1, except paragraphs 1(b), 6, 7 and 28 shall come into force on such day or days as the Lord Chancellor appoints;
Part IV and paragraphs 1(b), 6, 7 and 28 of Schedule 1 shall come into force on such day as the Lord Advocate appoints; and
Part V, section 45 above and paragraph 3 of Schedule 2 and the repeals specified in Schedule 3 shall come into force on such day or days as the Lord Chancellor appoints.
The power to appoint days for the coming into force of provisions of this Act shall be exercised by order made by statutory instrument.
This Act may be cited as the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.
Parts I to III and V and Schedules 2 and 3 extend to England and Wales only, Part IV extends to Scotland only . . .
Where any enactment amended by Schedule 1 extends to any part of the United Kingdom, the amendment extends to that part.
In this Part—
In family proceedings, no party to the proceedings who has been convicted of or given a caution for, or is charged with, a specified offence may cross-examine in person a witness who is the victim, or alleged victim, of that offence.
In family proceedings, no party to the proceedings who is the victim, or alleged victim, of a specified offence may cross-examine in person a witness who has been convicted of or given a caution for, or is charged with, that offence.
Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to a conviction or caution that is spent for the purposes of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, unless evidence in relation to the conviction or caution is admissible in, or may be required in, the proceedings by virtue of section 7(2), (3) or (4) of that Act.
Cross-examination in breach of subsection (1) or (2) does not affect the validity of a decision of the court in the proceedings if the court was not aware of the conviction, caution or charge when the cross-examination took place.
In this section—
The following provisions (which deem a conviction of a person discharged not to be a conviction) do not apply for the purposes of this section to a conviction of a person for an offence in respect of which an order has been made discharging the person absolutely or conditionally—
section 14 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000;
section 82 of the Sentencing Code;
section 187 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 or any corresponding earlier enactment.
For the purposes of this section “offence” includes an offence under a law that is no longer in force.
In family proceedings, no party to the proceedings against whom an on-notice protective injunction is in force may cross-examine in person a witness who is protected by the injunction.
In family proceedings, no party to the proceedings who is protected by an on-notice protective injunction may cross-examine in person a witness against whom the injunction is in force.
Cross-examination in breach of subsection (1) or (2) does not affect the validity of a decision of the court in the proceedings if the court was not aware of the protective injunction when the cross-examination took place.
In this section “protective injunction” means an order, injunction or interdict specified, or of a description specified, in regulations made by the Lord Chancellor.
For the purposes of this section, a protective injunction is an “on-notice” protective injunction if—
the court is satisfied that there has been a hearing at which the person against whom the protective injunction is in force asked, or could have asked, for the injunction to be set aside or varied, or
the protective injunction was made at a hearing of which the court is satisfied that both the person who applied for it and the person against whom it is in force had notice.
In family proceedings, where specified evidence is adduced that a person who is a witness has been the victim of domestic abuse carried out by a party to the proceedings, that party to the proceedings may not cross-examine the witness in person.
In family proceedings, where specified evidence is adduced that a person who is a party to the proceedings has been the victim of domestic abuse carried out by a witness, that party may not cross-examine the witness in person.
In this section—
“domestic abuse” has the meaning given by section 1 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021;
Regulations under subsection (3) may provide that any evidence which satisfies the court that domestic abuse, or domestic abuse of a specified description, has occurred is specified evidence for the purposes of this section.
In family proceedings, the court may give a direction prohibiting a party to the proceedings from cross-examining (or continuing to cross-examine) a witness in person if—
none of sections 31R to 31T operates to prevent the party from cross-examining the witness, and
it appears to the court that—
the quality condition or the significant distress condition is met, and
it would not be contrary to the interests of justice to give the direction.
The “quality condition” is met if the quality of evidence given by the witness on cross-examination—
is likely to be diminished if the cross-examination (or continued cross-examination) is conducted by the party in person, and
would be likely to be improved if a direction were given under this section.
The “significant distress condition” is met if—
the cross-examination (or continued cross-examination) of the witness by the party in person would be likely to cause significant distress to the witness or the party, and
that distress is likely to be more significant than would be the case if the witness were cross-examined other than by the party in person.
A direction under this section may be made by the court—
on an application made by a party to the proceedings, or
of its own motion.
In determining whether the quality condition or the significant distress condition is met in the case of a witness or party, the court must have regard to, among other things—
any views expressed by the witness as to whether or not the witness is content to be cross-examined by the party in person;
any views expressed by the party as to whether or not the party is content to cross-examine the witness in person;
the nature of the questions likely to be asked, having regard to the issues in the proceedings;
any behaviour by the party in relation to the witness in respect of which the court is aware that a finding of fact has been made in the proceedings or in any other proceedings;
any behaviour by the witness in relation to the party in respect of which the court is aware that a finding of fact has been made in the proceedings or in any other proceedings;
any behaviour by the party at any stage of the proceedings, both generally and in relation to the witness;
any behaviour by the witness at any stage of the proceedings, both generally and in relation to the party;
any relationship (of whatever nature) between the witness and the party.
Any reference in this section to the quality of a witness's evidence is to its quality in terms of completeness, coherence and accuracy.
For this purpose “coherence” refers to a witness's ability in giving evidence to give answers which—
address the questions put to the witness, and
can be understood, both individually and collectively.
A direction under section 31U has binding effect from the time it is made until the witness in relation to whom it applies is discharged.
But the court may revoke a direction under section 31U before the witness is discharged, if it appears to the court to be in the interests of justice to do so, either—
on an application made by a party to the proceedings, or
of its own motion.
The court may revoke a direction under section 31U on an application made by a party to the proceedings only if there has been a material change of circumstances since—
the direction was given, or
if a previous application has been made by a party to the proceedings, the application (or the last application) was determined.
The court must state its reasons for—
giving a direction under section 31U;
refusing an application for a direction under section 31U;
revoking a direction under section 31U;
refusing an application for the revocation of a direction under section 31U.
This section applies where a party to family proceedings is prevented from cross-examining a witness in person by virtue of any of sections 31R to 31U.
The court must consider whether (ignoring this section) there is a satisfactory alternative means—
for the witness to be cross-examined in the proceedings, or
of obtaining evidence that the witness might have given under cross-examination in the proceedings.
If the court decides that there is not, the court must—
invite the party to the proceedings to arrange for a qualified legal representative to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness, and
require the party to the proceedings to notify the court, by the end of a period specified by the court, of whether a qualified legal representative is to act for the party for that purpose.
Subsection (5) applies if, by the end of the period specified under subsection (3)(b), either—
the party has notified the court that no qualified legal representative is to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness, or
no notification has been received by the court and it appears to the court that no qualified legal representative is to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness.
The court must consider whether it is necessary in the interests of justice for the witness to be cross-examined by a qualified legal representative appointed by the court to represent the interests of the party.
If the court decides that it is, the court must appoint a qualified legal representative (chosen by the court) to cross-examine the witness in the interests of the party.
A qualified legal representative appointed by the court under subsection (6) is not responsible to the party.
For the purposes of this section—
a reference to cross-examination includes a reference to continuing to conduct cross-examination;
“qualified legal representative” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience (within the meaning of that Act) in family proceedings.
The Lord Chancellor may by regulations make provision for the payment out of central funds of sums in respect of—
fees or costs properly incurred by a qualified legal representative appointed under section 31W(6), and
expenses properly incurred in providing such a person with evidence or other material in connection with the appointment.
The regulations may provide for sums payable under subsection (1) to be determined by the Lord Chancellor or such other person as the regulations may specify.
The regulations may provide for sums payable under subsection (1)—
to be such amounts as are specified in the regulations;
to be calculated in accordance with—
a rate or scale specified in the regulations, or
other provision made by or under the regulations.
The Lord Chancellor may issue guidance in connection with the role which a qualified legal representative appointed under section 31W(6) in connection with any family proceedings is to play in the proceedings, including (among other things) guidance about the effect of section 31W(7).
A qualified legal representative appointed under section 31W(6) must have regard to any guidance issued under this section.
The Lord Chancellor may from time to time revise any guidance issued under this section.
The Lord Chancellor must publish—
any guidance issued under this section, and
any revisions of that guidance.
Any power of the Lord Chancellor to make regulations under this Part—
is exercisable by statutory instrument,
includes power to make different provision for different purposes, and
includes power to make supplementary, incidental, consequential, transitional, transitory or saving provision.
A statutory instrument containing regulations under this Part is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.