Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
19688

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 – Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Interdependence between factors.#Case T-141/22.

cjeu_case ·
19689

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#Sport1 GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 – Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Interdependence between factors.#Case T-141/22.

cjeu_case ·
19692

Case T-141/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — Sport1 v EUIPO — SFR (SFR SPORT1) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SFR SPORT 1 — Earlier national and international figurative marks sport1 — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Interdependence between factors)

cjeu_case ·
19694

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
19695

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 February 2023.#UniSkin ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild – Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-787/21.

cjeu_case ·
19698

Case T-787/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
19700

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 February 2023.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Regulatory act – Individual concern – Substantial effect on competitive position – Direct concern – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Selective nature – Advantage – Private operator test.#Case T-522/20.

cjeu_case ·