18061Case C-105/22, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie (Taxation of exported second hand vehicles): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — P.M. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of goods — Tax provisions — Article 110 TFEU — Excise duty — Export of a vehicle registered in a Member State to a country of the European Economic Area (EEA) — Refusal to reimburse the excise duty paid in respect of that vehicle up to an amount proportionate to the duration of its use in the territory of the Member State of registration — Principle that excise duty is a single-stage tax and principle of proportionality)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18062Case C-97/22, DC (Withdrawal after performance of the contract): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen — Germany) — DC v HJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 14(4)(a)(i) and (5) — Right of withdrawal for off-premises contracts — Information requirements for the trader concerned — Failure of that trader to inform the consumer — Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal — Withdrawal after the performance of the contract — Consequences)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18063Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#IR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Social security – Joint rules on sickness insurance for officials – Article 72 of the Staff Regulations – Serious illness – Opinion of the Medical Officer – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-685/21.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18064Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#IR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Social security – Joint rules on sickness insurance for officials – Article 72 of the Staff Regulations – Serious illness – Opinion of the Medical Officer – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-685/21.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18065Case T-685/21: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — IR v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Joint rules on sickness insurance for officials — Article 72 of the Staff Regulations — Serious illness — Opinion of the Medical Officer — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18066Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 mai 2023.#Funke sp. z o.o. contre Landespolizeidirektion Wien.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Directive 2001/95/CE – Article 12 et annexe II – Normes et réglementations techniques – Système d’échange rapide d’informations de l’Union européenne (RAPEX) – Lignes directrices – Produits non alimentaires dangereux – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2019/417 – Règlement (CE) no 765/2008 – Articles 20 et 22 – Notifications à la Commission européenne – Décision administrative – Interdiction de la vente de certains articles pyrotechniques et obligation de retrait – Demande d’un distributeur des produits concernés de compléter les notifications – Autorité compétente pour statuer sur la demande – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Protection juridictionnelle effective.#Affaire C-626/21.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18067Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#Funke Sp. z o.o. v Landespolizeidirektion Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/95/EC – Article 12 and Annex II – Technical standards and regulations – European Union Rapid Information System (RAPEX) – Guidelines – Dangerous non-food products – Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/417 – Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 – Articles 20 and 22 – Notifications to the European Commission – Administrative decision – Prohibition on the sale of certain pyrotechnic articles and obligation to withdraw – Request from a distributor of the products concerned that the notification be supplemented – Authority competent to give a decision on the request – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-626/21.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18068Case C-626/21, Funke: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Funke Sp. z o.o. v Landespolizeidirektion Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2001/95/EC — Article 12 and Annex II — Technical standards and regulations — European Union Rapid Information System (RAPEX) — Guidelines — Dangerous non-food products — Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/417 — Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 — Articles 20 and 22 — Notifications to the European Commission — Administrative decision — Prohibition on the sale of certain pyrotechnic articles and obligation to withdraw — Request from a distributor of the products concerned that the notification be supplemented — Authority competent to give a decision on the request — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18069Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main Holding GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – No standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-322/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18070Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main Holding GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – No standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-322/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18071Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#enercity AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Lack of locus standi – Lack of active participation – Inadmissibility.#Case T-321/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18072Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#enercity AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Lack of locus standi – Lack of active participation – Inadmissibility.#Case T-321/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18073Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Mainova AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – No standing to bring proceedings – No active participation – Admissibility.#Case T-320/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18074Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#Mainova AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – No standing to bring proceedings – No active participation – Admissibility.#Case T-320/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18075Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of a ‘single concentration’ – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to be heard – Definition of the market – Period of analysis – Analysis of market power – Decisive influence – Manifest errors of assessment – Duty of diligence.#Case T-319/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18076Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of a ‘single concentration’ – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to be heard – Definition of the market – Period of analysis – Analysis of market power – Decisive influence – Manifest errors of assessment – Duty of diligence.#Case T-319/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18077Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Lack of standing – Lack of active participation – Inadmissibility.#Case T-318/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18078Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Lack of standing – Lack of active participation – Inadmissibility.#Case T-318/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18079Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Definition of ‘single concentration’ – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to be heard – Definition of the market – Analysis period – Analysis of market power – Decisive influence – Manifest errors of assessment – Duty of diligence.#Case T-317/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023
18080Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 May 2023.#EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – German electricity market – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Definition of ‘single concentration’ – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to be heard – Definition of the market – Analysis period – Analysis of market power – Decisive influence – Manifest errors of assessment – Duty of diligence.#Case T-317/20.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2023