1741Case C-161/26, Wimetz: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 3 March 2026 – OS, PR, EE, IR v Ministerraadcjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1742Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 3 mars 2026.#DJO LLC contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-702/25 P.cjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1743Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026.#XV v Volkswagen AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-526/25.cjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1744Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026.#XV v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Steyr.#Case C-526/25.cjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1745Case C-702/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 3 March 2026 Appeal brought on 3 November 2025 by DJO LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 3 September 2025 – T-1102/23, DJO v EUIPO (Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)cjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1746C-526/25, Volkswagen: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Steyr – Austria) – XV v Volkswagen AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1747Joined Cases C-508/25, C-629/25 and C-639/25, Volkswagen: Order of the President of the Court of 3 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Telfs, Landesgericht Leoben – Austria) – KA, A, G A v Volkswagen AG, V, V AGcjeu_case · March 2, 2026
1753Case C-160/26, Associação Ius Omnibus II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 2 March 2026 – Associação Ius Omnibus v Airbnb Ireland UCcjeu_case · March 1, 2026
1754Case C-149/26, Althea Italia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana (Italy) lodged on 2 March 2026 – Althea Italia SpA – acting in its own name and as agent for the ad hoc tendering consortium (R.T.I.) to be established with Studio Cartolano Srl, Methodos di UD and NG v Regione Siciliana – Assessorato Regionale dell’Economia and Otherscjeu_case · March 1, 2026
1755Case T-571/25: Order of the General Court of 2 March 2026 – Europastry v EUIPO – Rupp (ALMA DE CEREAL) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the opposition – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · March 1, 2026
1758Case T-150/26: Action brought on 27 February 2026 – Bank of Russia v Councilcjeu_case · February 26, 2026
1759Case T-149/26: Action brought on 27 February 2026 – Eurobat v Commissioncjeu_case · February 26, 2026
1760Case T-148/26: Action brought on 27 February 2026 – Rombat and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · February 26, 2026